Contradictions In Eyewitness Accounts And Suppression Of Crucial Evidence Weaken The Prosecution's Case: Telangana High Court High Court of Sikkim Sets Aside Trial Court’s Decision on Maintainability of Suit: Preliminary Issues Must Be Purely of Law Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Procedure, Says High Court Writ Petitions Against Civil Court Orders Must Be Under Article 227: Patna High Court Reiterates Jurisdictional Boundaries Kerala High Court Upholds Eviction, Rejects Sub-Tenant's Kudikidappu Claim Contractual Employment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization: Jharkhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act for Past Domestic Violence: Bombay High Court Tenants Cannot Prescribe How Landlords Utilize Their Property: Delhi High Court Validates Eviction Labour Commissioner to Decide Petitioner’s Date of Birth Claim within Three Months, Ensuring Proper Verification and Consideration of Evidence: Uttarakhand High Court Concealment of Health Condition and False Allegations Amount to Cruelty: Gujarat High Court Upholds Divorce Decree Judicial Proceedings Cannot Be Instituted After Four Years: MP High Court in Quashing FIR Against Retired Engineer Orissa High Court Invalidates Lecturer Recruitment Advertisements for Non-Compliance with UGC Standards Public Interest Jurisdiction Not a Substitute for Private Litigation: Karnataka High Court Declines PIL Cognizance under Section 188 IPC is illegal without a public servant’s complaint:Kerala High Court Juvenile Justice Act Prevails Over Recruitment Rules: Madras High Court Rules Juvenile Records Cannot Bar Employment in Police Services" Calcutta High Court Quashes MR Distributorship Selection Due to Irregularities in Godown Compliance and Selection Process Once the driver has established the validity of his license, the insurer cannot escape liability without conclusive proof to the contrary: J&K HC Belated Claims Cannot Be Entertained: Kerala High Court Overturns CAT Decision on Date of Birth Correction DNA Tests Cannot Supersede Established Legal Presumptions: Himachal Pradesh HC Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides VAT Act: Secured Creditor's Charge Has Priority Over State's Tax Dues: Gujrat High Court High Court of Delhi Clarifies Jurisdiction in Commercial Dispute: 'Procedural Efficiency Must Be Upheld Power Under Section 319 CrPC Cannot Be Exercised Without Prima Facie Case Beyond Contradictions: Supreme Court Motive Alone Insufficient for Conviction Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Supreme Court Ensures Equal Financial Benefits for All High Court Judges: Discrimination Based on Recruitment Source Struck Down Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Four Accused: Cites Contradictory Dying Declarations and Lack of Independent Evidence in Murder Case Evidence Corroborates Violent Robbery and Recovery of Stolen Articles: Calcutta High Court Upholds Conviction in Burrabazar Dacoity Case Failure to Implead Contesting Candidates is Fatal; Fundamental Defect Cannot Be Cured: Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Magistrate Not Functus Officio Post-Final Order in Maintenance Cases: Allahabad High Court Substantial Questions of Law a Must in Second Appeals, Reiterates Andhra Pradesh High Court Inconsistencies and Procedural Lapses: Allahabad High Court Acquits Four in Neeta Singh Murder Case

Promotion to Higher Posts Subject to Recruitment Rules and Medical Fitness, Dismisses Plea for Notional Promotion: High Court of Delhi

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling concerning service law and promotion eligibility, the Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking retrospective promotion in the Border Security Force (BSF). The court emphasized that “administrative procedures, including the framing of recruitment rules and assessing fitness, must be adhered to in service promotions.”

Legal Point of Judgment: The crux of the judgment revolved around the petitioner’s plea for promotion to the rank of Inspector General, Chief Law Officer in BSF. The Court focused on whether the principles of promotion eligibility, legitimate expectation, and the impact of delayed framing of recruitment rules could entitle the petitioner to notional promotion and consequential benefits.

Facts and Issues: The petitioner, who joined BSF in 1984, challenged the rejection of his request for promotion, citing medical fitness standards and the unavailability of recruitment rules as reasons. Despite an unfortunate accident leading to amputation, the petitioner rose through ranks, ultimately aiming for the post of CLO/IG, upgraded in 2013.

Promotion Eligibility: The court observed that eligibility is governed by recruitment rules and medical fitness standards. Any promotion must align with these pre-requisites.

Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation: The court noted that this doctrine does not automatically confer promotion, especially without a consistent past practice or specific assurance from the authorities.

Delayed Recruitment Rules: Highlighting administrative laxity, the court nonetheless ruled that such delay does not justify retrospective promotion, particularly when the petitioner retired before the rules were framed.

Comparative Seniority and Litigation: The inter-se seniority dispute and pending litigation further complicated the petitioner’s claim for promotion.

Decision: The petition was dismissed, with the Court holding that the petitioner’s claim for the year 2013-2014 lacked merit due to non-fulfillment of eligibility criteria and procedural requirements.

Date of Decision: March 20, 2024

K J S Bains vs. Union of India And Ors.

Similar News