Desertion and irretrievable breakdown of marriage, sustained for over two decades, constitute mental cruelty: Allahabad High Court Dissolves 34-Year-Old Marriage Acquittal in Criminal Case Must Prompt Review of Dismissal: Telangana High Court There Must Be an Intention to Provoke or Drive the Victim to Commit Suicide: High Court Discharges Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Plaintiffs' Claim of Private Ownership Over Public Road Fails: Balance of Convenience Favors Defendants, Rules Bombay High Court Suspicious Circumstances Invalidated Unregistered Will in Partition Dispute: Supreme Court Suspicious Circumstances Must Be Resolved Even After Valid Execution of Will: Supreme Court Procedural Rules Cannot Obstruct Access to Justice: Litigants Should Not Suffer for Counsel's Negligence: Supreme Court Restores Suit Dismissed Ex-Parte Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence or Reverse Well-Founded Factual Findings: Supreme Court IBC | Corporate Guarantee Under Hypothecation Deeds Qualifies as Financial Debt: Supreme Court Beneficial Legislation Must Be Interpreted Purposively to Protect the Rights of Senior Citizens: Supreme Court Quashes Gift Deed Executed by Senior Citizen Attempt Must Go Beyond Preparation: Rajasthan High Court Alters Conviction in 33-Year-Old Case Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs Aided Institution to Pay Leave Encashment to Retired Employees Kerala High Court Allows Review Petitions in Custody Dispute, Recalls Earlier Judgment Granting Interim Custody to Father Copyright in Sound Recordings Must Be Protected: Delhi High Court in Interim Injunction Grounds of Arrest Must Be Served in Writing, But Remand Report Can Satisfy Constitutional Mandate: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Prolonged Detention Without Trial Violates Liberty: Supreme Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case

11 October 2024 3:31 PM

By: sayum


Supreme Court of India granted bail to Izaz Ahamad in a case involving the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. The court considered the prolonged detention of the appellant, who had been in custody since April 2023, and the delayed commencement of the trial as key factors in allowing bail.

Izaz Ahamad had been arrested on April 25, 2023, under Sections 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act, following the recovery of a significant quantity of Codeine Phosphate syrup. The chargesheet and a supplementary chargesheet were filed, but the trial was scheduled to begin only in January 2025. Ahamad's bail application was initially rejected by the Calcutta High Court on April 30, 2024, prompting him to appeal to the Supreme Court.

The appellant argued that his continued incarceration for over a year without the trial commencing was a violation of his liberty, as guaranteed under the Constitution. His counsel submitted that the long delay in the trial, coupled with the uncertainty regarding the number of witnesses to be examined, would result in further postponement of justice.

The key issue before the Supreme Court was whether continued pre-trial detention, without the prospect of the trial commencing soon, justified granting bail under the NDPS Act, where stringent conditions typically apply to bail applications.

The State opposed the bail, citing the severity of the offence and the rampant misuse of Codeine Phosphate syrup in West Bengal. The State further argued that Ahamad’s release could lead to the continuation of illegal activities.

The Supreme Court, after considering the arguments, acknowledged the long duration of Ahamad's pre-trial detention. The court noted that while the charges against the appellant were serious, the delay in trial was equally concerning. The bench observed:

"Considering the facts on record, in our view, the case for bail is made out."

The court directed the trial court to release Ahamad on bail, subject to conditions ensuring his presence during the trial. It also emphasized that any violation of the bail conditions would lead to the cancellation of bail.

The Supreme Court granted bail to Izaz Ahamad after nearly 17 months of detention, citing the delay in the trial as a key reason. The court's decision underscores the importance of balancing the rights of the accused with the need for timely prosecution in criminal cases.

Date of Decision: October 4, 2024

Izaz Ahamad @ Ahmed vs. The State of West Bengal​.

 

Similar News