Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

Procedural Lapses and Delay in Trial Lead to Release of Accused Carrying 12 kg Ganja Each: High Court of Delhi Grants Bail in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to Vishwajeet Singh and Dev Kumar @ Golu, accused of carrying 12 kg of Ganja each, under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla, who observed key procedural lapses in the handling of the seized narcotics and emphasized the right to a speedy trial.

The court delved into the legal intricacies involving Sections 20/61/85 of the NDPS Act, particularly focusing on procedural requirements under Section 42 (search and seizure), Section 52A (disposal of seized narcotics), and the principle of clubbing the quantity of contraband in NDPS cases.

The accused were apprehended on December 2, 2020, with 12 kg of Ganja each. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy, clubbing the recovered quantities to classify as commercial quantity. The defense challenged the admissibility of Call Detail Records (CDRs), the validity of the search and seizure, and compliance with NDPS Act procedures.

Procedural Irregularities: The court noted procedural lapses in the search and seizure process and the handling of the seized narcotics, especially concerning compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act regarding the disposal of seized narcotics.

Principle of Clubbing Quantity: The court discussed the applicability of Section 29 (conspiracy) and Section 37 (commercial quantity) of the NDPS Act, referencing several precedents. It was observed that the invocation of Section 29 cannot be faulted at this stage.

Right to Speedy Trial: Emphasizing Article 21 of the Constitution, the court noted the prolonged incarceration of over three years and the lack of conclusive evidence against the accused at this stage as grounds for granting bail.

The court granted bail to Vishwajeet Singh and Dev Kumar @ Golu, directing them to furnish a personal bond and comply with specific conditions, including not leaving the country without permission and not indulging in any criminal activity.

Date of Decision : February 28, 2024.

Vishwajeet Singh vs. State (NCT of Delhi )

Latest Legal News