Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

Procedural Lapses and Delay in Trial Lead to Release of Accused Carrying 12 kg Ganja Each: High Court of Delhi Grants Bail in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to Vishwajeet Singh and Dev Kumar @ Golu, accused of carrying 12 kg of Ganja each, under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla, who observed key procedural lapses in the handling of the seized narcotics and emphasized the right to a speedy trial.

The court delved into the legal intricacies involving Sections 20/61/85 of the NDPS Act, particularly focusing on procedural requirements under Section 42 (search and seizure), Section 52A (disposal of seized narcotics), and the principle of clubbing the quantity of contraband in NDPS cases.

The accused were apprehended on December 2, 2020, with 12 kg of Ganja each. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy, clubbing the recovered quantities to classify as commercial quantity. The defense challenged the admissibility of Call Detail Records (CDRs), the validity of the search and seizure, and compliance with NDPS Act procedures.

Procedural Irregularities: The court noted procedural lapses in the search and seizure process and the handling of the seized narcotics, especially concerning compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act regarding the disposal of seized narcotics.

Principle of Clubbing Quantity: The court discussed the applicability of Section 29 (conspiracy) and Section 37 (commercial quantity) of the NDPS Act, referencing several precedents. It was observed that the invocation of Section 29 cannot be faulted at this stage.

Right to Speedy Trial: Emphasizing Article 21 of the Constitution, the court noted the prolonged incarceration of over three years and the lack of conclusive evidence against the accused at this stage as grounds for granting bail.

The court granted bail to Vishwajeet Singh and Dev Kumar @ Golu, directing them to furnish a personal bond and comply with specific conditions, including not leaving the country without permission and not indulging in any criminal activity.

Date of Decision : February 28, 2024.

Vishwajeet Singh vs. State (NCT of Delhi )

Latest Legal News