MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Procedural Lapses and Delay in Trial Lead to Release of Accused Carrying 12 kg Ganja Each: High Court of Delhi Grants Bail in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to Vishwajeet Singh and Dev Kumar @ Golu, accused of carrying 12 kg of Ganja each, under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla, who observed key procedural lapses in the handling of the seized narcotics and emphasized the right to a speedy trial.

The court delved into the legal intricacies involving Sections 20/61/85 of the NDPS Act, particularly focusing on procedural requirements under Section 42 (search and seizure), Section 52A (disposal of seized narcotics), and the principle of clubbing the quantity of contraband in NDPS cases.

The accused were apprehended on December 2, 2020, with 12 kg of Ganja each. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy, clubbing the recovered quantities to classify as commercial quantity. The defense challenged the admissibility of Call Detail Records (CDRs), the validity of the search and seizure, and compliance with NDPS Act procedures.

Procedural Irregularities: The court noted procedural lapses in the search and seizure process and the handling of the seized narcotics, especially concerning compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act regarding the disposal of seized narcotics.

Principle of Clubbing Quantity: The court discussed the applicability of Section 29 (conspiracy) and Section 37 (commercial quantity) of the NDPS Act, referencing several precedents. It was observed that the invocation of Section 29 cannot be faulted at this stage.

Right to Speedy Trial: Emphasizing Article 21 of the Constitution, the court noted the prolonged incarceration of over three years and the lack of conclusive evidence against the accused at this stage as grounds for granting bail.

The court granted bail to Vishwajeet Singh and Dev Kumar @ Golu, directing them to furnish a personal bond and comply with specific conditions, including not leaving the country without permission and not indulging in any criminal activity.

Date of Decision : February 28, 2024.

Vishwajeet Singh vs. State (NCT of Delhi )

Latest Legal News