Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Procedural Lapses and Delay in Trial Lead to Release of Accused Carrying 12 kg Ganja Each: High Court of Delhi Grants Bail in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to Vishwajeet Singh and Dev Kumar @ Golu, accused of carrying 12 kg of Ganja each, under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla, who observed key procedural lapses in the handling of the seized narcotics and emphasized the right to a speedy trial.

The court delved into the legal intricacies involving Sections 20/61/85 of the NDPS Act, particularly focusing on procedural requirements under Section 42 (search and seizure), Section 52A (disposal of seized narcotics), and the principle of clubbing the quantity of contraband in NDPS cases.

The accused were apprehended on December 2, 2020, with 12 kg of Ganja each. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy, clubbing the recovered quantities to classify as commercial quantity. The defense challenged the admissibility of Call Detail Records (CDRs), the validity of the search and seizure, and compliance with NDPS Act procedures.

Procedural Irregularities: The court noted procedural lapses in the search and seizure process and the handling of the seized narcotics, especially concerning compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act regarding the disposal of seized narcotics.

Principle of Clubbing Quantity: The court discussed the applicability of Section 29 (conspiracy) and Section 37 (commercial quantity) of the NDPS Act, referencing several precedents. It was observed that the invocation of Section 29 cannot be faulted at this stage.

Right to Speedy Trial: Emphasizing Article 21 of the Constitution, the court noted the prolonged incarceration of over three years and the lack of conclusive evidence against the accused at this stage as grounds for granting bail.

The court granted bail to Vishwajeet Singh and Dev Kumar @ Golu, directing them to furnish a personal bond and comply with specific conditions, including not leaving the country without permission and not indulging in any criminal activity.

Date of Decision : February 28, 2024.

Vishwajeet Singh vs. State (NCT of Delhi )

Latest Legal News