Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Procedural Lapses and Delay in Trial Lead to Release of Accused Carrying 12 kg Ganja Each: High Court of Delhi Grants Bail in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to Vishwajeet Singh and Dev Kumar @ Golu, accused of carrying 12 kg of Ganja each, under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla, who observed key procedural lapses in the handling of the seized narcotics and emphasized the right to a speedy trial.

The court delved into the legal intricacies involving Sections 20/61/85 of the NDPS Act, particularly focusing on procedural requirements under Section 42 (search and seizure), Section 52A (disposal of seized narcotics), and the principle of clubbing the quantity of contraband in NDPS cases.

The accused were apprehended on December 2, 2020, with 12 kg of Ganja each. The prosecution alleged a conspiracy, clubbing the recovered quantities to classify as commercial quantity. The defense challenged the admissibility of Call Detail Records (CDRs), the validity of the search and seizure, and compliance with NDPS Act procedures.

Procedural Irregularities: The court noted procedural lapses in the search and seizure process and the handling of the seized narcotics, especially concerning compliance with Section 52A of the NDPS Act regarding the disposal of seized narcotics.

Principle of Clubbing Quantity: The court discussed the applicability of Section 29 (conspiracy) and Section 37 (commercial quantity) of the NDPS Act, referencing several precedents. It was observed that the invocation of Section 29 cannot be faulted at this stage.

Right to Speedy Trial: Emphasizing Article 21 of the Constitution, the court noted the prolonged incarceration of over three years and the lack of conclusive evidence against the accused at this stage as grounds for granting bail.

The court granted bail to Vishwajeet Singh and Dev Kumar @ Golu, directing them to furnish a personal bond and comply with specific conditions, including not leaving the country without permission and not indulging in any criminal activity.

Date of Decision : February 28, 2024.

Vishwajeet Singh vs. State (NCT of Delhi )

Latest Legal News