Accused Loses Right To Default Bail By Acquiescence If Extension Orders Are Challenged Only After Chargesheet Filing: Supreme Court AP High Court Orders Release Of Vehicle Seized For Mineral Transport Violations Upon Payment Of Penalty, Says Rules Don't Mandate Indefinite Detention Short Time Gap Between 'Last Seen' And Death Clinches Murder Conviction Against Fired Driver: Allahabad High Court Court Must Restore Possession To Dispossessed Party If Ex-Parte Decree Is Set Aside Even If Property Descriptions Differ: Andhra Pradesh High Court Management Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointment Citing Delay If It Failed To Maintain Service Records: Calcutta High Court Long Possession Alone Does Not Establish Tenancy; Burden Of Proof Lies On Person Claiming Status Of Tenant: Bombay High Court Consent Of Minor Immaterial: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction But Acquits Man Of Kidnapping Charges Notional Income Of Minor In Motor Accident Claims Must Be Based On Minimum Wages Of Skilled Workmen: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹56.8 Lakhs Revenue Records Serve Only Fiscal Purpose, Cannot Be Treated As Proof Of Title To Property: Supreme Court Executing Court Cannot Grant 'Deemed Extension' Of Time For Deposit In Specific Performance Decree: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable If Balance Sale Consideration Not Deposited Within Stipulated Time: Supreme Court Supreme Court Protects MSMEs From Closure Over Missing Environmental Clearance If Pollution Boards Were Unaware Of Requirement Industrial Units Operating With Valid PCB Consents Can't Be Closed Merely For Technical Want Of Prior Environmental Clearance: Supreme Court Punishment On Charge Not Framed In Show Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Supreme Court Reduces Doctor's Penalty To Censure Plea Of Acquiescence Cannot Defeat Lawful Title Claim When Encroachment Is Established: Madras High Court Board Of Revenue Can't Quash Unchallenged Orders While Exercising Revisional Jurisdiction: Orissa High Court Penetration To Any Extent Sufficient For Offence Under POCSO Act; Intact Hymen No Bar For Conviction: Meghalaya High Court Expeditious Conclusion Of Summary Force Court Trial Not Arbitrary If Procedure Followed; ITBPF Act Self-Contained: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Doesn't Bar Appeal Filed Prior To Withdrawal Of Earlier Defective Appeal Against Same Order: Madhya Pradesh High Court Appointment Of Receiver Is An 'Extreme Remedy', Cannot Be Ordered Lightly Especially After Decades Of Inaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Priority of Registered Sale Deed over Unregistered Agreement in Property Dispute – Rejects Review Petition on Grounds of Limitation and Merit: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court dismissed a review petition filed by appellant Imran Jamali, in the case titled Imran Jamali vs. Insha Khanam (Review Pet. 328/2023, CM APPLs. 60749/2023 & 60750/2023 in RFA 163/2022), on grounds of both limitation and merit. The Court emphasized the primacy of a registered sale deed over an unregistered agreement to sell in property transactions.

Justice V. Kameswar Rao, presiding over the matter, observed that the appellant’s contention regarding the discretionary nature of Order XII Rule 6 CPC and the need for clear and complete admission for judgment under it, was not tenable in the present case. The Court notably stated, “No interest has been passed in favour of the appellant / defendant with regard to the suit property,” underscoring the legal superiority of a registered sale deed over an unregistered agreement.

The review petition challenged the Court’s earlier order dated April 22, 2022, which had dismissed the appellant’s first appeal. The appellant sought to review this decision, arguing that the Court had not considered relevant Supreme Court judgments while making its decision. However, the Court found these submissions unconvincing.

Additionally, the Court noted the substantial delay of 441 days in filing the review petition. The appellant had attributed this delay to the filing of an application under Order XXI Rule 29 of the CPC in the execution proceedings. However, Justice Rao clarified that such proceedings could not justify the delay in challenging the primary order of April 22, 2022.

Date of Decision: November 29, 2023

IMRAN JAMALI VS INSHA KHANAM

Latest Legal News