Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Priority of Registered Sale Deed over Unregistered Agreement in Property Dispute – Rejects Review Petition on Grounds of Limitation and Merit: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court dismissed a review petition filed by appellant Imran Jamali, in the case titled Imran Jamali vs. Insha Khanam (Review Pet. 328/2023, CM APPLs. 60749/2023 & 60750/2023 in RFA 163/2022), on grounds of both limitation and merit. The Court emphasized the primacy of a registered sale deed over an unregistered agreement to sell in property transactions.

Justice V. Kameswar Rao, presiding over the matter, observed that the appellant’s contention regarding the discretionary nature of Order XII Rule 6 CPC and the need for clear and complete admission for judgment under it, was not tenable in the present case. The Court notably stated, “No interest has been passed in favour of the appellant / defendant with regard to the suit property,” underscoring the legal superiority of a registered sale deed over an unregistered agreement.

The review petition challenged the Court’s earlier order dated April 22, 2022, which had dismissed the appellant’s first appeal. The appellant sought to review this decision, arguing that the Court had not considered relevant Supreme Court judgments while making its decision. However, the Court found these submissions unconvincing.

Additionally, the Court noted the substantial delay of 441 days in filing the review petition. The appellant had attributed this delay to the filing of an application under Order XXI Rule 29 of the CPC in the execution proceedings. However, Justice Rao clarified that such proceedings could not justify the delay in challenging the primary order of April 22, 2022.

Date of Decision: November 29, 2023

IMRAN JAMALI VS INSHA KHANAM

Similar News