No Arbitration Agreement, No Arbitrator: Supreme Court Voids Award Made Without Municipal Council's Consent, Calls Entire Proceedings "Coram Non Judice" Post-Disposal Miscellaneous Applications Maintainable Only In Rare Situations; Court Becomes Functus Officio After SLP Dismissal: Supreme Court Vague & Omnibus Allegations Against Relatives In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Nipped In The Bud; 7-Year Delay In FIR Fatal: Supreme Court State Can Withdraw Electricity Duty Exemption For Captive Power Plants In Public Interest But Must Give One-Year Notice Period: Supreme Court DSC Personnel Entitled To Second Pension; Shortfall In Service Up To 12 Months Can Be Condoned: Supreme Court Person Professing Christianity Cannot Claim Scheduled Caste Status To Invoke SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Except Matters One May, But Exclude Justice One Cannot: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Holds State Cannot Be Judge In Its Own Cause On Disputed Breach When State Requisitions Your Vehicle For Elections And It Kills Someone, The State Pays — Not Your Insurer: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Financial Burden Cannot Defeat Constitutional Right to Just Compensation: Supreme Court Unsigned Charge Is A Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial Unless 'Failure Of Justice' Is Shown: Supreme Court Tenant Files Fresh Petition Before Rent Authority After Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Review And Misc Application — Court Calls It "Gross Abuse of Process", Voids Restoration Order Taxation Law | Exemption For Naphtha Depends On 'Intended Use' At Procurement, Not Actual Exclusive Use: Supreme Court Army's Own Grading System Worked Against Women Officers For Years — Supreme Court Grants Permanent Commission, Pension To Short Service Women Officers

Police Must Intimate to Bar Council or Nearest Bar Association on Arrest of Advocate – Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Karnataka, led by Chief Justice Prasanna B. Varale and Justice Krishna S. Dixit, issued a significant directive that the arrest and detention of lawyers must be immediately intimated to the Karnataka State Bar Council and the nearest Bar Association. This ruling came in response to a suo moto case concerning the alleged assault on Advocate Preetham N.T. by Chikkamagaluru Police.

The Court emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in the arrest of legal practitioners, stating, “Any authority, be it Police or other on effecting the arrest & detention of lawyers, should inform the same to the Karnataka State Bar Council and also to the nearest Bar Association, preferably to which he belongs.”

This decision was part of the judgment in WRIT PETITION NO. 26762 OF 2023 (GM-RES), initiated following a representation by the Advocates’ Association, Bengaluru. The FIR for this case includes charges under various sections of the IPC, including 506, 341, 307, 324, 326, and 504 read with 149.

In an important observation, the Court underscored the principle of judicial non-interference in police investigations. “We are not in agreement with [the request for immediate arrest and time-bound disciplinary action against accused police officers]. It hardly needs to be stated that the investigation belongs to the domain of Police,” the judgment read. This statement reaffirms the Court’s commitment to maintaining the separation of powers and ensuring due process in legal proceedings.

The judgment also led to the formation of a High-Level Committee to enhance relations between the Bar, Police, and District Administration. This committee, comprising various legal and police representatives, has been tasked with suggesting measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Date of Decision: 13th December 2023

High Court of Karnataka  VS State of Karnataka

Latest Legal News