Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Police Must Intimate to Bar Council or Nearest Bar Association on Arrest of Advocate – Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Karnataka, led by Chief Justice Prasanna B. Varale and Justice Krishna S. Dixit, issued a significant directive that the arrest and detention of lawyers must be immediately intimated to the Karnataka State Bar Council and the nearest Bar Association. This ruling came in response to a suo moto case concerning the alleged assault on Advocate Preetham N.T. by Chikkamagaluru Police.

The Court emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in the arrest of legal practitioners, stating, “Any authority, be it Police or other on effecting the arrest & detention of lawyers, should inform the same to the Karnataka State Bar Council and also to the nearest Bar Association, preferably to which he belongs.”

This decision was part of the judgment in WRIT PETITION NO. 26762 OF 2023 (GM-RES), initiated following a representation by the Advocates’ Association, Bengaluru. The FIR for this case includes charges under various sections of the IPC, including 506, 341, 307, 324, 326, and 504 read with 149.

In an important observation, the Court underscored the principle of judicial non-interference in police investigations. “We are not in agreement with [the request for immediate arrest and time-bound disciplinary action against accused police officers]. It hardly needs to be stated that the investigation belongs to the domain of Police,” the judgment read. This statement reaffirms the Court’s commitment to maintaining the separation of powers and ensuring due process in legal proceedings.

The judgment also led to the formation of a High-Level Committee to enhance relations between the Bar, Police, and District Administration. This committee, comprising various legal and police representatives, has been tasked with suggesting measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Date of Decision: 13th December 2023

High Court of Karnataka  VS State of Karnataka

Latest Legal News