Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Police Must Intimate to Bar Council or Nearest Bar Association on Arrest of Advocate – Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Karnataka, led by Chief Justice Prasanna B. Varale and Justice Krishna S. Dixit, issued a significant directive that the arrest and detention of lawyers must be immediately intimated to the Karnataka State Bar Council and the nearest Bar Association. This ruling came in response to a suo moto case concerning the alleged assault on Advocate Preetham N.T. by Chikkamagaluru Police.

The Court emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in the arrest of legal practitioners, stating, “Any authority, be it Police or other on effecting the arrest & detention of lawyers, should inform the same to the Karnataka State Bar Council and also to the nearest Bar Association, preferably to which he belongs.”

This decision was part of the judgment in WRIT PETITION NO. 26762 OF 2023 (GM-RES), initiated following a representation by the Advocates’ Association, Bengaluru. The FIR for this case includes charges under various sections of the IPC, including 506, 341, 307, 324, 326, and 504 read with 149.

In an important observation, the Court underscored the principle of judicial non-interference in police investigations. “We are not in agreement with [the request for immediate arrest and time-bound disciplinary action against accused police officers]. It hardly needs to be stated that the investigation belongs to the domain of Police,” the judgment read. This statement reaffirms the Court’s commitment to maintaining the separation of powers and ensuring due process in legal proceedings.

The judgment also led to the formation of a High-Level Committee to enhance relations between the Bar, Police, and District Administration. This committee, comprising various legal and police representatives, has been tasked with suggesting measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Date of Decision: 13th December 2023

High Court of Karnataka  VS State of Karnataka

Latest Legal News