Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Police Must Intimate to Bar Council or Nearest Bar Association on Arrest of Advocate – Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Karnataka, led by Chief Justice Prasanna B. Varale and Justice Krishna S. Dixit, issued a significant directive that the arrest and detention of lawyers must be immediately intimated to the Karnataka State Bar Council and the nearest Bar Association. This ruling came in response to a suo moto case concerning the alleged assault on Advocate Preetham N.T. by Chikkamagaluru Police.

The Court emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in the arrest of legal practitioners, stating, “Any authority, be it Police or other on effecting the arrest & detention of lawyers, should inform the same to the Karnataka State Bar Council and also to the nearest Bar Association, preferably to which he belongs.”

This decision was part of the judgment in WRIT PETITION NO. 26762 OF 2023 (GM-RES), initiated following a representation by the Advocates’ Association, Bengaluru. The FIR for this case includes charges under various sections of the IPC, including 506, 341, 307, 324, 326, and 504 read with 149.

In an important observation, the Court underscored the principle of judicial non-interference in police investigations. “We are not in agreement with [the request for immediate arrest and time-bound disciplinary action against accused police officers]. It hardly needs to be stated that the investigation belongs to the domain of Police,” the judgment read. This statement reaffirms the Court’s commitment to maintaining the separation of powers and ensuring due process in legal proceedings.

The judgment also led to the formation of a High-Level Committee to enhance relations between the Bar, Police, and District Administration. This committee, comprising various legal and police representatives, has been tasked with suggesting measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Date of Decision: 13th December 2023

High Court of Karnataka  VS State of Karnataka

Latest Legal News