Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

P&H High Court Holds Customs Authorities Cannot Initiate Proceedings Once Export Obligation Is Fulfilled and Bond Is Redeemed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has held that Customs Authorities cannot initiate proceedings against an assessee once the export obligation has been discharged and the bond has been redeemed. The judgment came in an appeal filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Ludhiana against M/s Jindal Drugs Ltd. The Court, comprising Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Manisha Batra, dismissed the appeal and set aside the impugned order passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.

The case involved the loss of imported goods, specifically 50 MT of Cocoa Paste, during transit from the port to the factory. The respondent, M/s Jindal Drugs Ltd., informed the department about the loss and replaced the lost quantity by purchasing Cocoa Paste from the local market to fulfill their export obligation. Notably, the respondent did not claim any rebate or duty drawback during the export.

The appellant, Commissioner of Customs, demanded duty on the imported goods, imposed penalties, and ordered redemption of fine. The impugned order confirmed the demand of duty and imposed a redemption fine, but the Tribunal allowed the respondent's appeal, setting aside the order.

The High Court, in its judgment, held that once the export obligation was discharged and the bond was redeemed, Customs Authorities were precluded from initiating proceedings against the respondent-assessee. The Court emphasized that there was no violation of the conditions of the relevant notification and found no illegality or perversity in the impugned order.

The Court further noted that the appellant's counsel failed to cite any judgments supporting their contention that Customs Authorities could initiate proceedings even after the fulfillment of export obligations and redemption of the bond. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

This judgment has significant implications for the customs-related cases in the region, providing clarity on the rights and obligations of importers/exporters once their export obligations are fulfilled. It underscores the importance of adhering to the conditions of relevant notifications and the role of Customs Authorities in administering customs laws effectively.

Date of decision: 24.05.2023

Commissioner of Customs, Ludhiana  vs M/s Jindal Drugs Ltd.

Latest Legal News