Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization

P&H High Court Grants Interim Protection from Arrest to Congress Leader Partap Singh Bajwa in ‘50 Bombs’ Remark Case

16 April 2025 6:27 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


In a politically significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted interim relief to Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in the Punjab Assembly, Partap Singh Bajwa, in connection with an FIR registered over his controversial public statement claiming that “50 bombs have reached Punjab” — of which 18 had already exploded and 32 were yet to go off.

The FIR was lodged at the Cyber Crime Police Station, Mohali, invoking non-bailable offences under Sections 197(1)(d) and 353(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), citing charges of spreading false information likely to disturb public order and obstructing public servants in discharge of their duties.

Bajwa moved the High Court seeking quashing of the FIR, asserting that his statement was meant to highlight rising concerns over law and order in Punjab and was neither provocative nor intended to incite unrest. He alleged that the case was politically motivated and aimed at stifling his criticism of the state administration.

After hearing arguments, the High Court directed the State of Punjab not to take coercive action against Bajwa till the next date of hearing, which is scheduled for April 22, 2025. The Court issued notice to the state government and sought its reply on the plea for quashing the FIR.

While granting the interim protection, the Court also directed Bajwa to cooperate with the ongoing investigation. The matter continues to attract significant political and legal attention, given Bajwa’s stature and the sensitivity of his remarks amid heightened public security concerns.

Latest Legal News