Landowners Accepting Compensation For Partial Acquisition Cannot Later Seek Entire Property’s Acquisition Under Section 94 RFCTLARR Act: Patna High Court Retrospective Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Must Be Commensurate With Husband's Salary In Respective Years: Madhya Pradesh High Court Injunction Order Paying 'Lip-Service' To Cardinal Tests Without Addressing Allegations Of Fraud Is Unsustainable: Calcutta High Court Land Loser Appointments: Railways Not In Contempt For Requiring Physical Tests & Matriculation Qualifications, Rules Calcutta High Court Mere Presence Or Post-Incident Help Not Sufficient To Prove Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC: Allahabad High Court Election Petition Against Municipal President Maintainable Within 30 Days Of Election Meeting Despite Absence Of Gazette Notification: Madhya Pradesh High Court Husband Cannot Be Convicted For Wife’s Death Merely Because They Lived Under Same Roof Without Proof Of His Presence: Allahabad High Court Prosecution Case Demolished If Physical Layout In IO’s Sketch Map Contradicts Witness Testimony: Calcutta High Court Suppression Of Facts Not Fatal If Not Material To Merits; State Cannot Benefit From Its Own Failure To Implement Orders: Supreme Court Nature Of Property And Limitation In Partition Suits Are Mixed Questions Of Law & Fact, Cannot Be Decided Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Telangana High Court Landlord Residing In Same Building Entitled To Eviction For Nuisance By Tenant's Patrons; No Need To Examine Independent Witnesses: Bombay High Court "Shocking Administrative Apathy": Supreme Court Summons Rajasthan Top Brass Over Failure To Curb Illegal Sand Mining In Chambal Sanctuary CISF Personnel Making Unsubstantiated Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Colleagues Can Be Removed From Service: Delhi High Court Decree On Admission Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Can Be Based On Statements Made In Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Writ Petition Challenging Labour Tribunal Award Maintainable Even Against Privatized Air India: Delhi High Court Bar Council Of India Seeks Mamata Banerjee's Enrolment Details After Former WB CM Appears In Calcutta HC In Advocate's Robes

P&H High Court Grants Interim Protection from Arrest to Congress Leader Partap Singh Bajwa in ‘50 Bombs’ Remark Case

16 April 2025 6:27 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


In a politically significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted interim relief to Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in the Punjab Assembly, Partap Singh Bajwa, in connection with an FIR registered over his controversial public statement claiming that “50 bombs have reached Punjab” — of which 18 had already exploded and 32 were yet to go off.

The FIR was lodged at the Cyber Crime Police Station, Mohali, invoking non-bailable offences under Sections 197(1)(d) and 353(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), citing charges of spreading false information likely to disturb public order and obstructing public servants in discharge of their duties.

Bajwa moved the High Court seeking quashing of the FIR, asserting that his statement was meant to highlight rising concerns over law and order in Punjab and was neither provocative nor intended to incite unrest. He alleged that the case was politically motivated and aimed at stifling his criticism of the state administration.

After hearing arguments, the High Court directed the State of Punjab not to take coercive action against Bajwa till the next date of hearing, which is scheduled for April 22, 2025. The Court issued notice to the state government and sought its reply on the plea for quashing the FIR.

While granting the interim protection, the Court also directed Bajwa to cooperate with the ongoing investigation. The matter continues to attract significant political and legal attention, given Bajwa’s stature and the sensitivity of his remarks amid heightened public security concerns.

Latest Legal News