UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Permits Student to Continue Course Despite Non-Payment of Fees: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment concerning educational law and the rights of students, the Delhi High Court, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice C. Hari Shankar, has emphasized the importance of equitable considerations in educational matters. The Court has allowed a student of Delhi University, who missed her first semester examination due to non-payment of fees, to continue her B.A. (Hons.) course and appear for the third semester examination.

The judgment addresses the intersection of academic eligibility, entitlement to appear in examinations, and the applicability of university regulations. The Court differentiates between a student’s eligibility based on academic qualifications and entitlement based on administrative formalities, such as fee payment.

Vanshika, the petitioner, enrolled in the B.A. (Hons.) course at Kalindi College, Delhi University but failed to attempt her first semester examination due to a failed fee transaction. Despite this, she was assured by the authorities that she could take her first semester exams with her third semester. She attended her second and third semester classes but faced issues with the university not releasing her second semester results and not permitting her to fill the examination form for the third semester.

The Court scrutinized the applicability of NEP-UGCF 2022 Guidelines and other university notifications and found them inapplicable or unworkable in the petitioner’s context. The Court underscored the importance of equitable considerations, holding that the petitioner’s academic progress should not be hampered due to administrative lapses. It was observed that non-payment of fees affected the petitioner’s entitlement but not her eligibility to continue the course.

The Court allowed the writ petition, directing Delhi University to declare the petitioner’s second semester results and permit her to continue with her B.A. (Hons.) course. The petitioner was allowed to appear for her third semester examination, along with the first semester examination, upon fulfilling necessary formalities, including fee payment.

Date of Decision: 19 February 2024

Vanshika vs University of Delhi & Anr,

 

Latest Legal News