Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Permits Student to Continue Course Despite Non-Payment of Fees: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment concerning educational law and the rights of students, the Delhi High Court, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice C. Hari Shankar, has emphasized the importance of equitable considerations in educational matters. The Court has allowed a student of Delhi University, who missed her first semester examination due to non-payment of fees, to continue her B.A. (Hons.) course and appear for the third semester examination.

The judgment addresses the intersection of academic eligibility, entitlement to appear in examinations, and the applicability of university regulations. The Court differentiates between a student’s eligibility based on academic qualifications and entitlement based on administrative formalities, such as fee payment.

Vanshika, the petitioner, enrolled in the B.A. (Hons.) course at Kalindi College, Delhi University but failed to attempt her first semester examination due to a failed fee transaction. Despite this, she was assured by the authorities that she could take her first semester exams with her third semester. She attended her second and third semester classes but faced issues with the university not releasing her second semester results and not permitting her to fill the examination form for the third semester.

The Court scrutinized the applicability of NEP-UGCF 2022 Guidelines and other university notifications and found them inapplicable or unworkable in the petitioner’s context. The Court underscored the importance of equitable considerations, holding that the petitioner’s academic progress should not be hampered due to administrative lapses. It was observed that non-payment of fees affected the petitioner’s entitlement but not her eligibility to continue the course.

The Court allowed the writ petition, directing Delhi University to declare the petitioner’s second semester results and permit her to continue with her B.A. (Hons.) course. The petitioner was allowed to appear for her third semester examination, along with the first semester examination, upon fulfilling necessary formalities, including fee payment.

Date of Decision: 19 February 2024

Vanshika vs University of Delhi & Anr,

 

Latest Legal News