Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Permits Student to Continue Course Despite Non-Payment of Fees: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment concerning educational law and the rights of students, the Delhi High Court, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice C. Hari Shankar, has emphasized the importance of equitable considerations in educational matters. The Court has allowed a student of Delhi University, who missed her first semester examination due to non-payment of fees, to continue her B.A. (Hons.) course and appear for the third semester examination.

The judgment addresses the intersection of academic eligibility, entitlement to appear in examinations, and the applicability of university regulations. The Court differentiates between a student’s eligibility based on academic qualifications and entitlement based on administrative formalities, such as fee payment.

Vanshika, the petitioner, enrolled in the B.A. (Hons.) course at Kalindi College, Delhi University but failed to attempt her first semester examination due to a failed fee transaction. Despite this, she was assured by the authorities that she could take her first semester exams with her third semester. She attended her second and third semester classes but faced issues with the university not releasing her second semester results and not permitting her to fill the examination form for the third semester.

The Court scrutinized the applicability of NEP-UGCF 2022 Guidelines and other university notifications and found them inapplicable or unworkable in the petitioner’s context. The Court underscored the importance of equitable considerations, holding that the petitioner’s academic progress should not be hampered due to administrative lapses. It was observed that non-payment of fees affected the petitioner’s entitlement but not her eligibility to continue the course.

The Court allowed the writ petition, directing Delhi University to declare the petitioner’s second semester results and permit her to continue with her B.A. (Hons.) course. The petitioner was allowed to appear for her third semester examination, along with the first semester examination, upon fulfilling necessary formalities, including fee payment.

Date of Decision: 19 February 2024

Vanshika vs University of Delhi & Anr,

 

Latest Legal News