Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Permits Student to Continue Course Despite Non-Payment of Fees: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment concerning educational law and the rights of students, the Delhi High Court, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice C. Hari Shankar, has emphasized the importance of equitable considerations in educational matters. The Court has allowed a student of Delhi University, who missed her first semester examination due to non-payment of fees, to continue her B.A. (Hons.) course and appear for the third semester examination.

The judgment addresses the intersection of academic eligibility, entitlement to appear in examinations, and the applicability of university regulations. The Court differentiates between a student’s eligibility based on academic qualifications and entitlement based on administrative formalities, such as fee payment.

Vanshika, the petitioner, enrolled in the B.A. (Hons.) course at Kalindi College, Delhi University but failed to attempt her first semester examination due to a failed fee transaction. Despite this, she was assured by the authorities that she could take her first semester exams with her third semester. She attended her second and third semester classes but faced issues with the university not releasing her second semester results and not permitting her to fill the examination form for the third semester.

The Court scrutinized the applicability of NEP-UGCF 2022 Guidelines and other university notifications and found them inapplicable or unworkable in the petitioner’s context. The Court underscored the importance of equitable considerations, holding that the petitioner’s academic progress should not be hampered due to administrative lapses. It was observed that non-payment of fees affected the petitioner’s entitlement but not her eligibility to continue the course.

The Court allowed the writ petition, directing Delhi University to declare the petitioner’s second semester results and permit her to continue with her B.A. (Hons.) course. The petitioner was allowed to appear for her third semester examination, along with the first semester examination, upon fulfilling necessary formalities, including fee payment.

Date of Decision: 19 February 2024

Vanshika vs University of Delhi & Anr,

 

Latest Legal News