MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Permanent Disability is Such That it Has Shut All Doors on Almost All Her Future Career Opportunities and Prospects: Delhi High Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Amputee

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd, affirming and enhancing the compensation awarded to Ms. Seema, who suffered severe injuries resulting in the amputation of her right arm and an 85% permanent disability after a motor vehicle accident.

The core legal issue involved the adequacy of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) for Ms. Seema’s profound losses and the subsequent life adjustments required by her disability. The appellant challenged the quantum of compensation, especially regarding future earnings and the costs of a prosthetic limb.

The incident occurred on August 26, 2016, when a bus insured by the appellant company collided with the motorcycle Ms. Seema was riding on. At the time of the accident, Ms. Seema was a 22-year-old student at Delhi University. The MACT had initially awarded a compensation amount considering her medical expenses, the severe impact on her lifestyle, and potential future earnings.

Driver’s Negligence: The court noted that there was no contention against the tribunal’s finding on the bus driver’s negligence, which was the accident’s primary cause.

Prosthetic Limb Costs: The High Court found no merit in the appellant’s argument that the tribunal had erroneously awarded an arbitrary amount for the prosthetic limb. The award was substantiated by expert testimony and aligned with Supreme Court precedents, ensuring Ms. Seema could afford quality prosthetics throughout her life.

Future Earnings: Emphasizing the profound impact of the disability on Ms. Seema, who is right-handed, the court noted her significantly diminished capacity to perform various personal and professional tasks. The tribunal’s application of a 40% enhancement on the minimum wages for future earnings loss was upheld.

Enhancements for Non-economic Damages: The High Court increased amounts for mental anguish and potential difficulties in marital prospects due to societal perceptions and physical challenges post-disability.

Decision: The appeal was dismissed, with the total compensation enhanced to Rs. 67,65,238. The court mandated the prompt deposit of the revised compensation amount, with penalties specified for non-compliance, emphasizing timely relief for Ms. Seema.

 Date of Decision: April 23, 2024.

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Ms. Seema & Ors.

Latest Legal News