Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Payment Must Be Made in Foreign Currency (USD) : Currency Conversion Terms: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India settled a long-standing dispute over the date for converting an awarded sum from US Dollars to Indian Rupees in a contract dated June 29, 1982. The judgment, delivered on October 10, 2023, clarified that the payment must be made in foreign currency (USD), with parties having the flexibility to agree on the rate of conversion.

The dispute between the National Projects Construction Corporation Limited (NPCCL) and Royal Construction Company Private Ltd. (RCCPL) centered on the terms of the agreement, an award, and previous court decisions. The High Court referred the question to the Supreme Court, highlighting the importance of the issue.

The Supreme Court's judgment emphasized the absence of any provision for payment in Indian Rupees in the agreement. The award specifically directed payment in Iraqi Dinars to be convertible into US Dollars as per the original agreement. This ruling means there is no requirement to determine a specific date for conversion into Indian Rupees.

In a statement, the Supreme Court stated, "Perusal of the material does not permit payment of the awarded amount in Indian currency except the amount of Rs. 20 lakhs with admissible interest against the encashment of a bank guarantee. As a necessary corollary, there would be no question of the amount awarded in Iraqi Dinars to be converted into Indian currency. The only conversion permissible was in US Dollars."

This landmark judgment provides clarity on currency conversion terms in contracts, ensuring adherence to the original agreement's specifications. It underscores the significance of clear and precise language in contracts to avoid disputes in commercial transactions.

The Supreme Court's decision allows the parties involved to proceed with execution proceedings while maintaining the integrity of the original agreement.

Date of Decision: October 10, 2023

NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED vs ROYAL CONSTRUCTION  COMPANY PRIVATE LTD.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/10-Oct-2023-NPCCL-Vs-Royal-Constr-Co.pdf"]

Latest Legal News