High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

Patna High Court Upholds Conviction in Heinous Sexual Assault Case: Victim's Testimony Deemed Trustworthy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the bench comprising Justices Alok Kumar Pandey and Ashutosh Kumar upheld the conviction of the accused in a distressing case of sexual assault. The judgment, delivered on 11 September 2023, reaffirms the importance of the victim's testimony and underscores the need to treat it as trustworthy and reliable.

The case revolved around the accused's conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), along with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The accused had appealed against the verdict of the trial court.

In its detailed judgment, the court meticulously evaluated the evidence presented during the trial. The victim, the key witness in the case, had given a thorough and consistent account of the harrowing incident. The court observed that her testimony, akin to that of an injured witness, had remained steadfast under cross-examination.

The judgment highlighted that delay in lodging the First Information Report (FIR) should not be considered fatal when a reasonable explanation is provided. The court cited previous rulings to emphasize that in cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony should be treated on par with that of an injured witness.

Medical evidence played a crucial role in corroborating the victim's claims. Radiological findings confirmed that the victim was below 18 years of age, which made the provisions of the POCSO Act applicable to the case. The court found no grounds to question the trial court's findings and dismissed the appeal, affirming the conviction.

High court reiterated the responsibility of the judiciary to deal with cases of sexual assault with utmost sensitivity. It underscored that rape is not merely a physical assault but a crime that can cause profound psychological and physical harm to the victim. The court also cautioned against the possibility of false implications in such cases, highlighting the need for a balanced approach.

Date of Decision: 11 September 2023

Amar Gosai vs The State of Bihar                        

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Amar_Gosai_vs_The_State_Of_Bihar_on_11_September_2023_PatnaHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News