Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Patna High Court Upholds Conviction in Heinous Sexual Assault Case: Victim's Testimony Deemed Trustworthy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the bench comprising Justices Alok Kumar Pandey and Ashutosh Kumar upheld the conviction of the accused in a distressing case of sexual assault. The judgment, delivered on 11 September 2023, reaffirms the importance of the victim's testimony and underscores the need to treat it as trustworthy and reliable.

The case revolved around the accused's conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), along with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The accused had appealed against the verdict of the trial court.

In its detailed judgment, the court meticulously evaluated the evidence presented during the trial. The victim, the key witness in the case, had given a thorough and consistent account of the harrowing incident. The court observed that her testimony, akin to that of an injured witness, had remained steadfast under cross-examination.

The judgment highlighted that delay in lodging the First Information Report (FIR) should not be considered fatal when a reasonable explanation is provided. The court cited previous rulings to emphasize that in cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony should be treated on par with that of an injured witness.

Medical evidence played a crucial role in corroborating the victim's claims. Radiological findings confirmed that the victim was below 18 years of age, which made the provisions of the POCSO Act applicable to the case. The court found no grounds to question the trial court's findings and dismissed the appeal, affirming the conviction.

High court reiterated the responsibility of the judiciary to deal with cases of sexual assault with utmost sensitivity. It underscored that rape is not merely a physical assault but a crime that can cause profound psychological and physical harm to the victim. The court also cautioned against the possibility of false implications in such cases, highlighting the need for a balanced approach.

Date of Decision: 11 September 2023

Amar Gosai vs The State of Bihar                        

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Amar_Gosai_vs_The_State_Of_Bihar_on_11_September_2023_PatnaHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News