Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Patna High Court Upholds Conviction in Heinous Sexual Assault Case: Victim's Testimony Deemed Trustworthy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the bench comprising Justices Alok Kumar Pandey and Ashutosh Kumar upheld the conviction of the accused in a distressing case of sexual assault. The judgment, delivered on 11 September 2023, reaffirms the importance of the victim's testimony and underscores the need to treat it as trustworthy and reliable.

The case revolved around the accused's conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), along with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The accused had appealed against the verdict of the trial court.

In its detailed judgment, the court meticulously evaluated the evidence presented during the trial. The victim, the key witness in the case, had given a thorough and consistent account of the harrowing incident. The court observed that her testimony, akin to that of an injured witness, had remained steadfast under cross-examination.

The judgment highlighted that delay in lodging the First Information Report (FIR) should not be considered fatal when a reasonable explanation is provided. The court cited previous rulings to emphasize that in cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony should be treated on par with that of an injured witness.

Medical evidence played a crucial role in corroborating the victim's claims. Radiological findings confirmed that the victim was below 18 years of age, which made the provisions of the POCSO Act applicable to the case. The court found no grounds to question the trial court's findings and dismissed the appeal, affirming the conviction.

High court reiterated the responsibility of the judiciary to deal with cases of sexual assault with utmost sensitivity. It underscored that rape is not merely a physical assault but a crime that can cause profound psychological and physical harm to the victim. The court also cautioned against the possibility of false implications in such cases, highlighting the need for a balanced approach.

Date of Decision: 11 September 2023

Amar Gosai vs The State of Bihar                        

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Amar_Gosai_vs_The_State_Of_Bihar_on_11_September_2023_PatnaHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News