MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Patna High Court Upholds Conviction in Heinous Sexual Assault Case: Victim's Testimony Deemed Trustworthy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the bench comprising Justices Alok Kumar Pandey and Ashutosh Kumar upheld the conviction of the accused in a distressing case of sexual assault. The judgment, delivered on 11 September 2023, reaffirms the importance of the victim's testimony and underscores the need to treat it as trustworthy and reliable.

The case revolved around the accused's conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), along with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The accused had appealed against the verdict of the trial court.

In its detailed judgment, the court meticulously evaluated the evidence presented during the trial. The victim, the key witness in the case, had given a thorough and consistent account of the harrowing incident. The court observed that her testimony, akin to that of an injured witness, had remained steadfast under cross-examination.

The judgment highlighted that delay in lodging the First Information Report (FIR) should not be considered fatal when a reasonable explanation is provided. The court cited previous rulings to emphasize that in cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony should be treated on par with that of an injured witness.

Medical evidence played a crucial role in corroborating the victim's claims. Radiological findings confirmed that the victim was below 18 years of age, which made the provisions of the POCSO Act applicable to the case. The court found no grounds to question the trial court's findings and dismissed the appeal, affirming the conviction.

High court reiterated the responsibility of the judiciary to deal with cases of sexual assault with utmost sensitivity. It underscored that rape is not merely a physical assault but a crime that can cause profound psychological and physical harm to the victim. The court also cautioned against the possibility of false implications in such cases, highlighting the need for a balanced approach.

Date of Decision: 11 September 2023

Amar Gosai vs The State of Bihar                        

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Amar_Gosai_vs_The_State_Of_Bihar_on_11_September_2023_PatnaHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News