After Admitting Lease, Defendant Cannot Turn Around and Call It Forged—Contradictory Stand at Advanced Trial Stage Impermissible: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Amendment Plea Dismissed Employee Has No Right to Leave Encashment Under Statutory Rules: Punjab and Haryana High Court Section 13 of Gambling Act Is Cognizable — Magistrate Can Take Cognizance on Police Report: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Surveyor’s Report Not Sacrosanct, Arbitral Tribunal Has Jurisdiction to Apply Mind Independently: Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer’s Challenge to Award in Fire Damage Dispute Anti-Suit Injunction in Matrimonial Dispute Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Stall UK Divorce Proceedings Filed by Wife Res Ipsa Loquitur Not a Substitute for Proof of Negligence: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Fatal Road Accident Case NSA Detention Doesn’t Bar Framing of Charges If Prima Facie Evidence Exists: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Charges in Ajnala Police Station Violence Case Continued Contractual Service Despite Sanctioned Posts Is Unfair Labour Practice: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of ECG Technicians After 15 Years Will Duly Proved Even If Witnesses Forget Details After Eight Years: Madras High Court Validates Bequest, Sets Aside Partition Decree Writ Petition Not Maintainable Where Commercial Appeal Remedy Exists: Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition, Permits Conversion Under Commercial Courts Act Circumstantial Evidence Must Be Cogent, But Caste-Based Offences Demand Specific Intent: Supreme Court Draws Line Between Heinous Crimes and Caste Atrocities Court Must Step into Testator’s Shoes, Not Substitute His Intent: Supreme Court Upholds Will Excluding One Daughter Production of Arbitration Clause is Enough - Not Conduct Mini-Trials on Capacity or Consortium Structure: Supreme Court Title to Property Must Be Proven by Evidence, Not Just Claimed by Deed: Supreme Court Strikes Down Injunction Order Rejecting Police Investigation Is Not Interlocutory Where It Affects Complainant’s Right to Fair Probe in Murder Case: Madhya Pradesh High Court Restores Revision in 156(3) Application Rejection Conviction Cannot Rest On Contradictions, Hostility And Conjecture: Supreme Court Acquits Seven Accused In 2010 Village Murder Power to Lower NEET Percentile Lies Only With Centre - States Can’t Dilute NEET by Administrative Letters: Supreme Court Imposed 10 Crore Cost On Private Dental College Identification Without TIP, Electronic Records Without 65B Certificate – Conviction Set Aside: Patna High Court Nothing Inflicts A Deeper Wound On Our Constitutional Culture Than A State Official Running Berserk Regardless Of Human Rights: Jharkhand High Court Orders ₹1.5 Lakh Interim Compensation Identification Vitiated, Diamonds Not Produced, Last Seen Theory Unreliable: Bombay High Court Acquits Two in 2011 Diamond Courier Murder Dishonour Due to ‘Account Blocked’ Not Attributable to Drawer—No Offence Under Section 138 NI Act: Delhi High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Cannot Be Rebutted By Mere Assertions: Delhi High Court Affirms Conviction In 32-Year-Old Cheque Bounce Case Accused Cannot Demand Documents During Investigation Merely to Assist in Answering Queries: Delhi High Court Upholds Dismissal of S.91 CrPC Plea in Bank Fraud Probe Once a Person is a Major, They Are Free to Choose Their Partner – Absence of Marriage No Ground To Deny Protection: Allahabad High Court Connivance Can’t Be Washed Away by Exoneration: P&H High Court Upholds Penalty on Forest Guard Despite Enquiry Clean Chit Disciplinary Authority Cannot Override Enquiry Officer’s Clean Chit Without Hearing the Employee: Madhya Pradesh High Court Remands Termination for Procedural Lapse Appointment Secured by Misstating Marks Is Void Ab Initio; Human Error No Excuse Where Advantage Gained: Allahabad High Court Appeal Maintainable Despite Modified MACT Award — Kerala High Court Clarifies Scope of Appellate Review in Motor Accident Claims Signature Alone Doesn’t Prove Debt: Kerala High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case, Rejects Blanket Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act

Bombay HC Grants Bail to Drunk Driving Accused; Orders Public Awareness Campaign as a Condition

27 January 2025 12:00 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Bombay High Court granted bail to Sabyasachi Devpriya Nishank, a 32-year-old professional, arrested for drunk driving, evading police barricades, and damaging public property. The Court imposed stringent and unconventional bail conditions, including performing community service by spreading awareness about the dangers of drunk driving. Justice Milind N. Jadhav remarked, “The applicant’s youth, professional background, and familial support mitigate the risk of absconding, but the offense committed reflects a serious lapse in judgment.”

"Don't Drink and Drive": Bombay HC Imposes Public Awareness as Bail Condition
On November 28, 2024, Nishank, an MBA graduate and Senior Vice President of a prominent NBFC, was arrested after driving under the influence of alcohol with 42.5% BAC, failing to stop at two police barricades in Mumbai, and damaging public barricades and vehicles. The police reported that Nishank “drove his vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and disobeyed lawful directions.”

Justice Milind N. Jadhav, while granting bail, underscored the significance of accountability and deterrence. He noted, “The applicant is an educated young professional with a promising career ahead, but the offense of driving under the influence of alcohol is not to be taken lightly. The balance of justice requires granting him bail while ensuring societal accountability.”

The Court imposed strict conditions for bail, including depositing ₹50,000 in the Police Welfare Fund to compensate for damages caused to public property. More notably, the Court directed Nishank to perform community service by holding an awareness banner at Worli Naka Traffic Signal every weekend for three months. The banner will read “Don’t Drink and Drive” in bold letters, with Justice Jadhav emphasizing, “This community service is a reminder to the applicant and society at large of the devastating consequences of drunk driving.”

Judicial Observations: Balancing Punishment with Rehabilitation
Justice Jadhav observed, “The applicant’s further incarceration is unwarranted, considering his educational background and the two months already spent in custody. However, driving under the influence is a grave offense, and public accountability through community service will ensure both deterrence and awareness.”

The Court clarified that Section 110 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, a non-bailable offense, was invoked correctly, and emphasized the need for compliance with lawful directives. Addressing the applicant’s plea of misuse of police powers, the Court remarked that the allegations were “prima facie supported by evidence,” but further incarceration was unnecessary in the absence of violent conduct.

The Bombay High Court’s decision reflects a progressive and balanced approach to justice by combining legal accountability with community rehabilitation. Justice Jadhav’s order to “perform community service as a reminder of the ills of drinking and driving” highlights a growing trend of restorative justice, where offenders are made to contribute positively to society while facing the consequences of their actions.

Date of Decision: January 23, 2025
 

Latest Legal News