MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Bombay HC Grants Bail to Drunk Driving Accused; Orders Public Awareness Campaign as a Condition

27 January 2025 12:00 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Bombay High Court granted bail to Sabyasachi Devpriya Nishank, a 32-year-old professional, arrested for drunk driving, evading police barricades, and damaging public property. The Court imposed stringent and unconventional bail conditions, including performing community service by spreading awareness about the dangers of drunk driving. Justice Milind N. Jadhav remarked, “The applicant’s youth, professional background, and familial support mitigate the risk of absconding, but the offense committed reflects a serious lapse in judgment.”

"Don't Drink and Drive": Bombay HC Imposes Public Awareness as Bail Condition
On November 28, 2024, Nishank, an MBA graduate and Senior Vice President of a prominent NBFC, was arrested after driving under the influence of alcohol with 42.5% BAC, failing to stop at two police barricades in Mumbai, and damaging public barricades and vehicles. The police reported that Nishank “drove his vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and disobeyed lawful directions.”

Justice Milind N. Jadhav, while granting bail, underscored the significance of accountability and deterrence. He noted, “The applicant is an educated young professional with a promising career ahead, but the offense of driving under the influence of alcohol is not to be taken lightly. The balance of justice requires granting him bail while ensuring societal accountability.”

The Court imposed strict conditions for bail, including depositing ₹50,000 in the Police Welfare Fund to compensate for damages caused to public property. More notably, the Court directed Nishank to perform community service by holding an awareness banner at Worli Naka Traffic Signal every weekend for three months. The banner will read “Don’t Drink and Drive” in bold letters, with Justice Jadhav emphasizing, “This community service is a reminder to the applicant and society at large of the devastating consequences of drunk driving.”

Judicial Observations: Balancing Punishment with Rehabilitation
Justice Jadhav observed, “The applicant’s further incarceration is unwarranted, considering his educational background and the two months already spent in custody. However, driving under the influence is a grave offense, and public accountability through community service will ensure both deterrence and awareness.”

The Court clarified that Section 110 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, a non-bailable offense, was invoked correctly, and emphasized the need for compliance with lawful directives. Addressing the applicant’s plea of misuse of police powers, the Court remarked that the allegations were “prima facie supported by evidence,” but further incarceration was unnecessary in the absence of violent conduct.

The Bombay High Court’s decision reflects a progressive and balanced approach to justice by combining legal accountability with community rehabilitation. Justice Jadhav’s order to “perform community service as a reminder of the ills of drinking and driving” highlights a growing trend of restorative justice, where offenders are made to contribute positively to society while facing the consequences of their actions.

Date of Decision: January 23, 2025
 

Latest Legal News