Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Patna High Court Criticizes ‘Lack of Sensitivity and Scientific Rigor’ in Police Investigation of Kidnapping Case – Order Reinvestigation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a scathing judgement dated August 30, 2023, Justice Anil Kumar Sinha criticized the local police for their “lack of sensitivity and scientific rigor” in the investigation of a kidnapping case involving a minor. The case, Basantpur Police Station Case No. 194 of 2012, has been under scrutiny for years due to the police’s failure to recover the kidnapped child.

The petitioner had filed a writ application, expressing frustration over the police’s inaction despite multiple FIRs and representations to various authorities. The Court observed that the police had “not taken adequate steps for recovery”.

Justice Sinha pointed out the “lapses in oversight by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer and the Superintendent of Police,” which contributed to the investigation’s inadequacies. The Court also identified “multiple errors in the investigation,” including the incorrect retrieval of Call Detail Records (CDR) and inconsistent assignment of Investigating Officers.

Invoking Supreme Court guidelines, the Court mandated a re-investigation by the Crime Investigation Department of Bihar. “An officer of at least the rank of Superintendent of Police should lead the re-investigation,” the judgement stated .

The Court also ordered a stay on the proceedings in the District Court until the re-investigation is completed and the final report is submitted by the Crime Investigation Department.

The judgement cited the Supreme Court case of Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali Alias Deepak and Others, emphasizing the importance of “fair and proper investigation” in criminal jurisprudence.

Date of Decision: 30-08-2023

MANSUR ALAM vs THE STATE OF BIHAR

Latest Legal News