Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Patna High Court Criticizes ‘Lack of Sensitivity and Scientific Rigor’ in Police Investigation of Kidnapping Case – Order Reinvestigation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a scathing judgement dated August 30, 2023, Justice Anil Kumar Sinha criticized the local police for their “lack of sensitivity and scientific rigor” in the investigation of a kidnapping case involving a minor. The case, Basantpur Police Station Case No. 194 of 2012, has been under scrutiny for years due to the police’s failure to recover the kidnapped child.

The petitioner had filed a writ application, expressing frustration over the police’s inaction despite multiple FIRs and representations to various authorities. The Court observed that the police had “not taken adequate steps for recovery”.

Justice Sinha pointed out the “lapses in oversight by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer and the Superintendent of Police,” which contributed to the investigation’s inadequacies. The Court also identified “multiple errors in the investigation,” including the incorrect retrieval of Call Detail Records (CDR) and inconsistent assignment of Investigating Officers.

Invoking Supreme Court guidelines, the Court mandated a re-investigation by the Crime Investigation Department of Bihar. “An officer of at least the rank of Superintendent of Police should lead the re-investigation,” the judgement stated .

The Court also ordered a stay on the proceedings in the District Court until the re-investigation is completed and the final report is submitted by the Crime Investigation Department.

The judgement cited the Supreme Court case of Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali Alias Deepak and Others, emphasizing the importance of “fair and proper investigation” in criminal jurisprudence.

Date of Decision: 30-08-2023

MANSUR ALAM vs THE STATE OF BIHAR

Latest Legal News