Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Patna High Court Acquits Appellants In Attempted Murder Case Presence Of Any Of The Prosecution Witnesses Doubtful.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


PATNA, August 17, 2023 – In a significant verdict, the High Court of Judicature at Patna acquitted two appellants who were convicted in a case of attempted murder. The judgment, delivered by Honourable Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey, highlighted the lack of reliable and convincing evidence presented by the prosecution.

The case (Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.34 of 2023) arose from an incident that occurred in Piri Bazar, Lakhisarai in 2015. The appellants, Rakesh Kumar and Fantush Mandal, were convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 307 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The trial court had sentenced them to ten years of rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs. 10,000 each.

Justice Alok Kumar Pandey, in his judgment, meticulously examined the evidence presented before the court and observed, “The evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses is full of infirmities and contradictions.” The court noted that the informant, who put the initial version of the prosecution story in motion, claimed to be an eyewitness but was not present at the scene of the alleged crime. Moreover, the victim, who could have been a key witness, was not produced in court for examination.

The judgment further highlighted that the prosecution's witnesses, despite claiming to be eyewitnesses, had inconsistent accounts regarding the place of occurrence, the manner of occurrence, and the boundary of the crime scene. The court noted, “The presence of any of the prosecution witnesses at the place of occurrence is very much doubtful.”

Justice Pandey emphasized the importance of reliable and trustworthy evidence in criminal cases. Quoting a previous judgment, he noted, “Normally, an injured witness would enjoy greater credibility because he is the sufferer himself and thus, there will be no occasion for such a person to state an incorrect version of the occurrence.”

Ultimately, the court held that the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the acquittal of the appellants. The judgment serves as a reminder of the high standard of evidence required in criminal cases, especially in cases involving serious charges like attempted murder.

The decision of the High Court to acquit the appellants highlights the significance of presenting robust and consistent evidence in order to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision:  17-08-2023

RAKESH KUMAR @ CHANDAN MANDAL vs The State of Bihar Bihar

Latest Legal News