Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Patna High Court Acquits Appellants In Attempted Murder Case Presence Of Any Of The Prosecution Witnesses Doubtful.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


PATNA, August 17, 2023 – In a significant verdict, the High Court of Judicature at Patna acquitted two appellants who were convicted in a case of attempted murder. The judgment, delivered by Honourable Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey, highlighted the lack of reliable and convincing evidence presented by the prosecution.

The case (Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.34 of 2023) arose from an incident that occurred in Piri Bazar, Lakhisarai in 2015. The appellants, Rakesh Kumar and Fantush Mandal, were convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 307 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The trial court had sentenced them to ten years of rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs. 10,000 each.

Justice Alok Kumar Pandey, in his judgment, meticulously examined the evidence presented before the court and observed, “The evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses is full of infirmities and contradictions.” The court noted that the informant, who put the initial version of the prosecution story in motion, claimed to be an eyewitness but was not present at the scene of the alleged crime. Moreover, the victim, who could have been a key witness, was not produced in court for examination.

The judgment further highlighted that the prosecution's witnesses, despite claiming to be eyewitnesses, had inconsistent accounts regarding the place of occurrence, the manner of occurrence, and the boundary of the crime scene. The court noted, “The presence of any of the prosecution witnesses at the place of occurrence is very much doubtful.”

Justice Pandey emphasized the importance of reliable and trustworthy evidence in criminal cases. Quoting a previous judgment, he noted, “Normally, an injured witness would enjoy greater credibility because he is the sufferer himself and thus, there will be no occasion for such a person to state an incorrect version of the occurrence.”

Ultimately, the court held that the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the acquittal of the appellants. The judgment serves as a reminder of the high standard of evidence required in criminal cases, especially in cases involving serious charges like attempted murder.

The decision of the High Court to acquit the appellants highlights the significance of presenting robust and consistent evidence in order to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision:  17-08-2023

RAKESH KUMAR @ CHANDAN MANDAL vs The State of Bihar Bihar

Latest Legal News