Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Parties to a Suit and Witnesses on Same Footing for Document Production in Cross-Examination: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India clarified a significant procedural aspect in civil litigation. The Court, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sanjay Karol, has pronounced that “for the purposes of evidence, parties to a suit and witnesses are on the same footing,” specifically in the context of producing documents during cross-examination. This ruling came as the apex court adjudicated on Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.14445 of 2021.

The appeal, filed by Mohammed Abdul Wahid against respondents Nilofer & Anr., challenged the Bombay High Court’s interpretation of certain provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC). The crux of the matter revolved around whether a differentiation exists between a party to a suit and a witness regarding the production of documents during cross-examination.

In their detailed judgment, the Supreme Court observed that this distinction, as interpreted previously, does not align with the procedural law’s intent. The Court stated, “This understanding negates the interpretation that a party and a witness are different in the context of producing documents during cross-examination.” This observation is pivotal, as it shapes the practice of civil suits, especially regarding the fairness of the trial process and the opportunity for parties to present all relevant evidence.

The ruling also underscores the Court’s approach to interpreting procedural laws, where practical implications for the fair conduct of trials are given prominence. The judgment elaborates on this, asserting that “the production of documents at the stage of cross-examination for both a party to the suit and a witness is permissible within law.” This principle, as laid down by the Supreme Court, aims to balance the need for a comprehensive presentation of evidence with the principles of a fair trial.

The implications of this judgment are far-reaching, influencing the conduct of civil litigation across the country. By clarifying the equal treatment of parties and witnesses in the context of document production during cross-examination, the Supreme Court has streamlined an important aspect of the civil procedural law.

Date of Decision: 14th December 2023

MOHAMMED ABDUL WAHID  VS NILOFER & ANR.

Latest Legal News