Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Participation in Selection Process Precludes Challenge – Orissa High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions on Assistant Professor Appointments

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment today, the Orissa High Court, led by Justice Sashikanta Mishra, dismissed two writ petitions challenging the eligibility criteria for the post of Assistant Professor in Dentistry. The court underscored a vital principle, stating, “Having participated in the selection process, the candidates cannot question the procedure adopted therein.”

The petitions, filed by Dr. Tribikram Debata and Dr. Nimai Charan Mishra, contested the requirement of three years’ Senior Resident experience under the Odisha Medical Education Service Rules, 2013, for eligibility for the said post. The petitioners argued that this criterion was contrary to the Dental Council of India regulations and sought relief from the court.

However, the court observed, “The petitioners having not challenged the selection process at the relevant time but willfully participated therein, are estopped from challenging the same.” This observation effectively barred the petitioners from re-litigating the issue they had acquiesced to by participating in the selection process.

In its analysis, the court noted that the Odisha Medical Education Service (Method of Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2021, which do not require three years of Senior Resident experience, could not be retroactively applied to the selection process initiated under the 2013 Rules. As the petitioners did not meet the necessary experience criteria on the cut-off date as per the 2013 Rules, their candidature was deemed ineligible.

The court’s decision to dismiss the writ petitions echoes its commitment to uphold the principles of administrative law and judicial fairness. Advocates representing various parties, including Ms. Pami Rath, Mr. Saswat Das, and Mr. P.K. Mohanty, presented their arguments, but the court found no grounds to interfere with the OPSC’s decision. This ruling sets a precedent for future cases where the eligibility and selection process criteria are contested after participation.                                              

 D.D -10-Nov-2023

Dr. Tribikram Debata VS State of Odisha and others

Latest Legal News