Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Participation in Selection Process Precludes Challenge – Orissa High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions on Assistant Professor Appointments

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment today, the Orissa High Court, led by Justice Sashikanta Mishra, dismissed two writ petitions challenging the eligibility criteria for the post of Assistant Professor in Dentistry. The court underscored a vital principle, stating, “Having participated in the selection process, the candidates cannot question the procedure adopted therein.”

The petitions, filed by Dr. Tribikram Debata and Dr. Nimai Charan Mishra, contested the requirement of three years’ Senior Resident experience under the Odisha Medical Education Service Rules, 2013, for eligibility for the said post. The petitioners argued that this criterion was contrary to the Dental Council of India regulations and sought relief from the court.

However, the court observed, “The petitioners having not challenged the selection process at the relevant time but willfully participated therein, are estopped from challenging the same.” This observation effectively barred the petitioners from re-litigating the issue they had acquiesced to by participating in the selection process.

In its analysis, the court noted that the Odisha Medical Education Service (Method of Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2021, which do not require three years of Senior Resident experience, could not be retroactively applied to the selection process initiated under the 2013 Rules. As the petitioners did not meet the necessary experience criteria on the cut-off date as per the 2013 Rules, their candidature was deemed ineligible.

The court’s decision to dismiss the writ petitions echoes its commitment to uphold the principles of administrative law and judicial fairness. Advocates representing various parties, including Ms. Pami Rath, Mr. Saswat Das, and Mr. P.K. Mohanty, presented their arguments, but the court found no grounds to interfere with the OPSC’s decision. This ruling sets a precedent for future cases where the eligibility and selection process criteria are contested after participation.                                              

 D.D -10-Nov-2023

Dr. Tribikram Debata VS State of Odisha and others

Latest Legal News