MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Participation in Selection Process Precludes Challenge – Orissa High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions on Assistant Professor Appointments

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment today, the Orissa High Court, led by Justice Sashikanta Mishra, dismissed two writ petitions challenging the eligibility criteria for the post of Assistant Professor in Dentistry. The court underscored a vital principle, stating, “Having participated in the selection process, the candidates cannot question the procedure adopted therein.”

The petitions, filed by Dr. Tribikram Debata and Dr. Nimai Charan Mishra, contested the requirement of three years’ Senior Resident experience under the Odisha Medical Education Service Rules, 2013, for eligibility for the said post. The petitioners argued that this criterion was contrary to the Dental Council of India regulations and sought relief from the court.

However, the court observed, “The petitioners having not challenged the selection process at the relevant time but willfully participated therein, are estopped from challenging the same.” This observation effectively barred the petitioners from re-litigating the issue they had acquiesced to by participating in the selection process.

In its analysis, the court noted that the Odisha Medical Education Service (Method of Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2021, which do not require three years of Senior Resident experience, could not be retroactively applied to the selection process initiated under the 2013 Rules. As the petitioners did not meet the necessary experience criteria on the cut-off date as per the 2013 Rules, their candidature was deemed ineligible.

The court’s decision to dismiss the writ petitions echoes its commitment to uphold the principles of administrative law and judicial fairness. Advocates representing various parties, including Ms. Pami Rath, Mr. Saswat Das, and Mr. P.K. Mohanty, presented their arguments, but the court found no grounds to interfere with the OPSC’s decision. This ruling sets a precedent for future cases where the eligibility and selection process criteria are contested after participation.                                              

 D.D -10-Nov-2023

Dr. Tribikram Debata VS State of Odisha and others

Latest Legal News