TRAI Issuing Directions To Enforce Regulations Is Not 'Adjudication' Of Dispute, Does Not Usurp TDSAT's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Candidate Can Challenge Selection Process After Participating If Arbitrariness Is Writ Large Or Rules Changed Mid-Way: Supreme Court Selection Committee Cannot Superimpose Additional Cut-Off Marks Not Prescribed In Rules: Supreme Court Litigants Must Ordinarily Approach High Court First For Quashing FIRs, Article 32 Is For Exceptional Circumstances: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Club Multiple FIRs In Cyber Fraud Case, Says Similar Modus Operandi Does Not Constitute 'Same Transaction' Layman Borrowers Not Liable For Forgery If Even Bank's Legal Experts Failed To Detect Fabrication In Title Deeds: Allahabad High Court Kerala High Court Orders Travancore Devaswom Board To Digitise Sabarimala Asset Inventory, Says Current Records Resemble 'Betel Shop' Ledger Second Husband In Void Marriage Cannot Be Prosecuted For Dowry Death Under Section 80 BNS: Allahabad High Court Cohabitation Of Barely 3 Months Insufficient To Trigger Presumption Of Live-In Relationship For Maintenance: Bombay High Court SC/ST Act Case Filed By Suspended Head Constable To 'Wreck Vengeance' Against Investigating Officers Quashed: Andhra Pradesh High Court Non-Compliance With Order For Production Of Documents Under O.11 R.14 CPC Cannot Warrant Striking Off Defence: Calcutta High Court Omission To Put Dying Declaration To Accused Under Section 313 CrPC Makes It Inadmissible, But Doesn't Demolish Entire Prosecution Case: Delhi High Court Victim's Appeal Against Magistrate's Acquittal Order Lies Before Sessions Court Under Section 413 BNSS: Gujarat High Court 'Fraud And Justice Cannot Dwell Together': Karnataka High Court Quashes 30-Year-Old Land Acquisition After Records Of Compensation Go Missing Electricity Authorities Cannot Determine Civil Liability For Energy Theft Under Section 135; Only Special Court Empowered: Madhya Pradesh High Court State Cannot Exploit Employees By Keeping Them On Part-Time Basis For Decades To Deny Old Pension Scheme: Punjab & Haryana HC

Parole is a Wing of Reformative Process: Delhi High Court Grants Parole to Bangladeshi Life Convict After 17 Years

18 November 2024 2:20 PM

By: sayum


The Delhi High Court has granted parole to Jahangir @ Ekka @ Ibrahim, a Bangladeshi national serving life imprisonment, highlighting the significance of reformation and maintaining familial relations. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma emphasized the objectives of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, in facilitating a convict’s reintegration into society.

Jahangir, currently confined in Tihar Central Jail, was convicted under Sections 302/34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act in FIR No. 254/2003 and under Sections 395/397 IPC in FIR No. 41/2011. His appeals against these convictions were dismissed in 2009 and 2014, respectively. Having served over 17 years in prison, Jahangir sought parole to reconnect with his family and address personal matters.

The court underscored the reformative intent behind parole, stating, “Parole and Furlough to inmates are progressive measures of correctional services. The release of prisoner on parole not only saves him from the evils of incarceration but also enables him to maintain social relations with his family and community.”

Jahangir’s satisfactory conduct during his imprisonment was pivotal in the court’s decision. The court noted, “During the entire period of more than 17 years and 06 months of actual custody, the conduct of the petitioner has remained satisfactory in the jail.” The petitioner had worked as a langar sahayak and had not committed any prison offenses during his incarceration.

The court acknowledged the verification of the petitioner’s sister’s residence in Delhi. Jahangir’s commitment to reside with his sister during the parole period was confirmed by the police’s verification of her identity and address.

Justice Sharma emphasized the balance between state security and the convict’s rights. “This Court has to balance the rights of the State as well as the rights of a convict, especially in cases where the period of incarceration exceeds 17 years,” she stated. The court referred to the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, which advocate for parole to help inmates maintain self-confidence, develop a sense of hope, and stay connected with societal developments.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma remarked, “The release of prisoner on parole motivates him to maintain good conduct and remain disciplined in the prison.”

The Delhi High Court’s decision to grant parole to Jahangir underscores the judiciary’s commitment to the reformation and rehabilitation of convicts. This judgment reaffirms the principles enshrined in the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, aiming to facilitate the reintegration of prisoners into society by allowing them to maintain familial and social ties. Jahangir’s case highlights the court’s balanced approach in considering both the rights of the state and the individual, setting a precedent for future parole petitions.

Date of Decision: July 26, 2024

Latest Legal News