Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

P&H HC Quashes FIR and Proceedings Against TV Serial "Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush" for Alleged Portrayal of Bhagwan Valmiki

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has quashed the FIR and all consequent proceedings against the television serial "Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush" in relation to the alleged portrayal of Bhagwan Valmiki. The court rendered its decision on July 5, 2023, providing relief to the petitioners who sought to challenge the FIR registered against them.

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the case, stated in the judgment, "The impugned orders suspending the exhibition of the TV serial 'Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush' have no basis and are hereby quashed." The court took into account the previous order issued on October 17, 2019, which had formed a committee to address the grievances and suggest corrective measures for the TV serial.

The committee, comprising representatives of the Valmiki Samaj and other stakeholders, had recommended certain steps to be taken by the producers of the TV serial. The petitioners, in compliance with the committee's recommendations, had implemented corrective measures for the previous episodes and provided an undertaking to adhere to the guidelines for future telecasts.

The court highlighted the resolution reached between the stakeholders, stating that the undertaking provided by the petitioners had been accepted by the committee. The complainant, respondent No. 2, also expressed no objection to quashing the FIR, further strengthening the court's decision.

This judgment brings a conclusion to the legal battle surrounding the television serial and provides clarity on the portrayal of Bhagwan Valmiki. It underscores the importance of considering stakeholder dialogue and adherence to guidelines to address any concerns raised by communities.

The quashing of the FIR and proceedings marks a significant relief for the petitioners and serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in ensuring a fair and balanced interpretation of laws. The judgment sets a precedent for future cases involving similar controversies, emphasizing the need for open communication and respectful representation in the media.

Date of Decision: July 05, 2023

Rahul Kumar Tewary and others  vs State of Punjab and another

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/RahulKumar-Vs-State-05-July-2023-PH-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News