Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

P&H HC Quashes FIR and Proceedings Against TV Serial "Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush" for Alleged Portrayal of Bhagwan Valmiki

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has quashed the FIR and all consequent proceedings against the television serial "Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush" in relation to the alleged portrayal of Bhagwan Valmiki. The court rendered its decision on July 5, 2023, providing relief to the petitioners who sought to challenge the FIR registered against them.

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the case, stated in the judgment, "The impugned orders suspending the exhibition of the TV serial 'Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush' have no basis and are hereby quashed." The court took into account the previous order issued on October 17, 2019, which had formed a committee to address the grievances and suggest corrective measures for the TV serial.

The committee, comprising representatives of the Valmiki Samaj and other stakeholders, had recommended certain steps to be taken by the producers of the TV serial. The petitioners, in compliance with the committee's recommendations, had implemented corrective measures for the previous episodes and provided an undertaking to adhere to the guidelines for future telecasts.

The court highlighted the resolution reached between the stakeholders, stating that the undertaking provided by the petitioners had been accepted by the committee. The complainant, respondent No. 2, also expressed no objection to quashing the FIR, further strengthening the court's decision.

This judgment brings a conclusion to the legal battle surrounding the television serial and provides clarity on the portrayal of Bhagwan Valmiki. It underscores the importance of considering stakeholder dialogue and adherence to guidelines to address any concerns raised by communities.

The quashing of the FIR and proceedings marks a significant relief for the petitioners and serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in ensuring a fair and balanced interpretation of laws. The judgment sets a precedent for future cases involving similar controversies, emphasizing the need for open communication and respectful representation in the media.

Date of Decision: July 05, 2023

Rahul Kumar Tewary and others  vs State of Punjab and another

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/RahulKumar-Vs-State-05-July-2023-PH-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News