At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

P&H HC Quashes FIR and Proceedings Against TV Serial "Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush" for Alleged Portrayal of Bhagwan Valmiki

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has quashed the FIR and all consequent proceedings against the television serial "Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush" in relation to the alleged portrayal of Bhagwan Valmiki. The court rendered its decision on July 5, 2023, providing relief to the petitioners who sought to challenge the FIR registered against them.

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, presiding over the case, stated in the judgment, "The impugned orders suspending the exhibition of the TV serial 'Ram Siya Ke Luv Kush' have no basis and are hereby quashed." The court took into account the previous order issued on October 17, 2019, which had formed a committee to address the grievances and suggest corrective measures for the TV serial.

The committee, comprising representatives of the Valmiki Samaj and other stakeholders, had recommended certain steps to be taken by the producers of the TV serial. The petitioners, in compliance with the committee's recommendations, had implemented corrective measures for the previous episodes and provided an undertaking to adhere to the guidelines for future telecasts.

The court highlighted the resolution reached between the stakeholders, stating that the undertaking provided by the petitioners had been accepted by the committee. The complainant, respondent No. 2, also expressed no objection to quashing the FIR, further strengthening the court's decision.

This judgment brings a conclusion to the legal battle surrounding the television serial and provides clarity on the portrayal of Bhagwan Valmiki. It underscores the importance of considering stakeholder dialogue and adherence to guidelines to address any concerns raised by communities.

The quashing of the FIR and proceedings marks a significant relief for the petitioners and serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in ensuring a fair and balanced interpretation of laws. The judgment sets a precedent for future cases involving similar controversies, emphasizing the need for open communication and respectful representation in the media.

Date of Decision: July 05, 2023

Rahul Kumar Tewary and others  vs State of Punjab and another

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/RahulKumar-Vs-State-05-July-2023-PH-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News