Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

OCI cardholders are only eligible for NRI seats, not for State Quota or reserved categories meant for Indian citizens: Punjab & Haryana High Court

30 September 2024 8:49 PM

By: sayum


Punjab and Haryana High Court, in Aranav Bhargav v. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, dismissed a writ petition filed by an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholder seeking admission to MBBS under the State Quota. The petitioner, Aranav Bhargav, challenged the prospectus clause limiting OCI admissions to the NRI category, seeking admission under the sub-category for wards of gallantry award recipients. The Court upheld the clause, emphasizing that OCI cardholders cannot claim parity with Indian citizens for State Quota seats.

The petitioner, an OCI cardholder born in the USA, applied for MBBS admission under the NRI category but sought to be considered under the State Quota as a ward of a gallantry award recipient. The petitioner argued that the clause restricting OCI cardholders to the NRI category was discriminatory. However, the University and the State maintained that OCI candidates are eligible only for NRI seats as per the guidelines.

The key issue was whether OCI cardholders are entitled to be considered for State Quota seats, specifically under reserved categories meant for Indian citizens, despite the clear provisions of the prospectus limiting them to NRI seats.

Justice Kshetarpal ruled that the petitioner’s request lacked merit, as OCI cardholders are not entitled to claim rights reserved for Indian citizens under State Quota admissions. The Court referred to the legal distinction between OCI cardholders and Indian citizens, as outlined in the Citizenship Act, 1955, and various notifications from the Government of India.

"OCI cardholders, while entitled to various rights, cannot claim the same privileges as Indian citizens, particularly in matters of State Quota admissions."

Conclusion

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition, reaffirming that OCI cardholders are only eligible for admission under the NRI category and cannot claim State Quota seats reserved for Indian citizens, including reserved sub-categories such as gallantry award recipients.

Date of Decision: September 25, 2024

Aranav Bhargav v. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences​.

Latest Legal News