MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

OCI cardholders are only eligible for NRI seats, not for State Quota or reserved categories meant for Indian citizens: Punjab & Haryana High Court

30 September 2024 8:49 PM

By: sayum


Punjab and Haryana High Court, in Aranav Bhargav v. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, dismissed a writ petition filed by an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholder seeking admission to MBBS under the State Quota. The petitioner, Aranav Bhargav, challenged the prospectus clause limiting OCI admissions to the NRI category, seeking admission under the sub-category for wards of gallantry award recipients. The Court upheld the clause, emphasizing that OCI cardholders cannot claim parity with Indian citizens for State Quota seats.

The petitioner, an OCI cardholder born in the USA, applied for MBBS admission under the NRI category but sought to be considered under the State Quota as a ward of a gallantry award recipient. The petitioner argued that the clause restricting OCI cardholders to the NRI category was discriminatory. However, the University and the State maintained that OCI candidates are eligible only for NRI seats as per the guidelines.

The key issue was whether OCI cardholders are entitled to be considered for State Quota seats, specifically under reserved categories meant for Indian citizens, despite the clear provisions of the prospectus limiting them to NRI seats.

Justice Kshetarpal ruled that the petitioner’s request lacked merit, as OCI cardholders are not entitled to claim rights reserved for Indian citizens under State Quota admissions. The Court referred to the legal distinction between OCI cardholders and Indian citizens, as outlined in the Citizenship Act, 1955, and various notifications from the Government of India.

"OCI cardholders, while entitled to various rights, cannot claim the same privileges as Indian citizens, particularly in matters of State Quota admissions."

Conclusion

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition, reaffirming that OCI cardholders are only eligible for admission under the NRI category and cannot claim State Quota seats reserved for Indian citizens, including reserved sub-categories such as gallantry award recipients.

Date of Decision: September 25, 2024

Aranav Bhargav v. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences​.

Latest Legal News