IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court Limitation | Litigants Cannot Entirely Blame Advocates for Procedural Delays: Supreme Court Family's Criminal Past Cannot Dictate Passport Eligibility: Madhya Pradesh High Court Double Presumption of Innocence Bolsters Acquittal When Evidence Falls Short: Calcutta High Court Upholds Essential Commodities Act TIP Not Mandatory if Witness Testimony  Credible - Recovery of Weapon Not Essential for Conviction Under Section 397 IPC: Delhi High Court University’s Failure to Amend Statutes for EWS Reservation Renders Advertisement Unsustainable: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Quashes EWS Reservation in University Recruitment Process

OCI cardholders are only eligible for NRI seats, not for State Quota or reserved categories meant for Indian citizens: Punjab & Haryana High Court

30 September 2024 8:49 PM

By: sayum


Punjab and Haryana High Court, in Aranav Bhargav v. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, dismissed a writ petition filed by an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholder seeking admission to MBBS under the State Quota. The petitioner, Aranav Bhargav, challenged the prospectus clause limiting OCI admissions to the NRI category, seeking admission under the sub-category for wards of gallantry award recipients. The Court upheld the clause, emphasizing that OCI cardholders cannot claim parity with Indian citizens for State Quota seats.

The petitioner, an OCI cardholder born in the USA, applied for MBBS admission under the NRI category but sought to be considered under the State Quota as a ward of a gallantry award recipient. The petitioner argued that the clause restricting OCI cardholders to the NRI category was discriminatory. However, the University and the State maintained that OCI candidates are eligible only for NRI seats as per the guidelines.

The key issue was whether OCI cardholders are entitled to be considered for State Quota seats, specifically under reserved categories meant for Indian citizens, despite the clear provisions of the prospectus limiting them to NRI seats.

Justice Kshetarpal ruled that the petitioner’s request lacked merit, as OCI cardholders are not entitled to claim rights reserved for Indian citizens under State Quota admissions. The Court referred to the legal distinction between OCI cardholders and Indian citizens, as outlined in the Citizenship Act, 1955, and various notifications from the Government of India.

"OCI cardholders, while entitled to various rights, cannot claim the same privileges as Indian citizens, particularly in matters of State Quota admissions."

Conclusion

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition, reaffirming that OCI cardholders are only eligible for admission under the NRI category and cannot claim State Quota seats reserved for Indian citizens, including reserved sub-categories such as gallantry award recipients.

Date of Decision: September 25, 2024

Aranav Bhargav v. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences​.

Similar News