Without Partition By Metes And Bounds, Co-Sharer Cannot Seek Recovery Of Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of Order VII Rule 7 CPC Supreme Court Holds Plaintiff Entitled To Declaration Of Title Over Undivided Half Share Despite Claiming Entire Property Under Gift Deed Supreme Court Reaffirms Legality Of Remainder Of Natural Life Sentences Without Remission, Dismisses Batch Of Writ Petitions 'State Cannot Take Advantage Of Its Own Wrong': Supreme Court Holds Promotees Entitled To Count Ad Hoc Service For Seniority If Within Quota 'Elevators Are Common Carriers, Entail Heightened Duty of Care': Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Order Holding OTIS Principally Liable For Death Due To Malfunctioning Lift Supreme Court Dismisses Compensation Claim Under Motor Vehicles Act, Holds Reach Stacker Operating in Custom-Bonded ICD Area Is Not a "Motor Vehicle" Missing ACRs Due To Illegal Termination Cannot Block Higher Judicial Pay Scales: Supreme Court Grants Relief To Rajasthan Judicial Officer Subsequent Suit Generally Transferable To Court Where Earlier Suit On Same Subject Matter Is Pending: Allahabad High Court Successive Anticipatory Bail Maintainable Under BNSS If Fact Situation Changes Or Previous Findings Become Obsolete: Andhra Pradesh High Court Tenant's "Deemed Purchaser" Right Defeated By Retrospective Notification Under Section 88(1)(b) Of Tenancy Act: Bombay High Court Buyer Not Entitled To Refund Of Earnest Money Once Sale Deed Is Duly Executed Under The Agreement: Calcutta High Court Contradictory Pleas Vitiate Defence; Drawer Liable Even If Signed Blank Cheque Was Handed Over: Delhi High Court Working Mother's Relocation To Another City Not A Ground To Completely Deny Overnight Custody To Father: Karnataka High Court Civil Courts Barred From Granting Injunctions Against SARFAESI Actions Even If Partition Suit Is Maintainable: Kerala High Court S.147 NI Act Is A Special Law, Overrides S.320 CrPC; Offence Can Be Compounded At Any Stage Even After Dismissal Of Appeal: Madras High Court Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court

OCI cardholders are only eligible for NRI seats, not for State Quota or reserved categories meant for Indian citizens: Punjab & Haryana High Court

30 September 2024 8:49 PM

By: sayum


Punjab and Haryana High Court, in Aranav Bhargav v. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, dismissed a writ petition filed by an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholder seeking admission to MBBS under the State Quota. The petitioner, Aranav Bhargav, challenged the prospectus clause limiting OCI admissions to the NRI category, seeking admission under the sub-category for wards of gallantry award recipients. The Court upheld the clause, emphasizing that OCI cardholders cannot claim parity with Indian citizens for State Quota seats.

The petitioner, an OCI cardholder born in the USA, applied for MBBS admission under the NRI category but sought to be considered under the State Quota as a ward of a gallantry award recipient. The petitioner argued that the clause restricting OCI cardholders to the NRI category was discriminatory. However, the University and the State maintained that OCI candidates are eligible only for NRI seats as per the guidelines.

The key issue was whether OCI cardholders are entitled to be considered for State Quota seats, specifically under reserved categories meant for Indian citizens, despite the clear provisions of the prospectus limiting them to NRI seats.

Justice Kshetarpal ruled that the petitioner’s request lacked merit, as OCI cardholders are not entitled to claim rights reserved for Indian citizens under State Quota admissions. The Court referred to the legal distinction between OCI cardholders and Indian citizens, as outlined in the Citizenship Act, 1955, and various notifications from the Government of India.

"OCI cardholders, while entitled to various rights, cannot claim the same privileges as Indian citizens, particularly in matters of State Quota admissions."

Conclusion

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition, reaffirming that OCI cardholders are only eligible for admission under the NRI category and cannot claim State Quota seats reserved for Indian citizens, including reserved sub-categories such as gallantry award recipients.

Date of Decision: September 25, 2024

Aranav Bhargav v. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences​.

Latest Legal News