Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

OCI Card Holders Eligible for PG Medical Seat Admission,” Says Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the eligibility of Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card holders for admission to Post Graduate (PG) medical seats. The bench comprising of Justice A. Verma and Justice S. Kapoor delivered the verdict on 15th July 2023, addressing the rights of OCI card holders in seeking medical education opportunities.

The judgment revolves around a writ petition filed by a candidate who challenged the change of her status from an OCI candidate to an Indian national for PG medical seat admission. The petitioner sought relief under Article 32 of the Constitution, highlighting the critical issue of eligibility based on OCI status.

The Ministry of Home Affairs’ notification dated 04.03.2021, which withdrew certain privileges and eligibility criteria for OCI card holders, came under scrutiny. The Court observed, “The notification had a retroactive impact, altering the rights of OCI card holders in a manner that affected their eligibility for examinations like NEET.”

Citing the Court’s findings in the Anushka Rengunthwar case, the judgment emphasized the interpretation of the notification’s retroactive application. The Court ruled on the applicability of the notification to OCI card holders born before its issuance date, ensuring clarity on the matter.

The petitioner’s eligibility was examined based on her OCI status, and the Court directed that her eligibility be reconsidered for the remaining counseling rounds for PG medical seats. The directive emphasized the inclusion of OCI card holders who were issued cards before the notification’s implementation.

“The judgment reflects the Court’s commitment to ensuring equal opportunities for OCI card holders pursuing medical education in India,” remarked the bench. The ruling underscores the importance of fair and non-discriminatory treatment for OCI card holders, ensuring that their eligibility is considered on par with Indian nationals.

This landmark decision big relief for OCI card holders aspiring to pursue medical education in India, offering a renewed hope for equal educational opportunities.

D.D-01.09.2023.

PALLAVI vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.  

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/01-Sep-2023_Malikarjun_Vs_Vipin.pdf"]

Latest Legal News