Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

OCI Card Holders Eligible for PG Medical Seat Admission,” Says Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the eligibility of Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card holders for admission to Post Graduate (PG) medical seats. The bench comprising of Justice A. Verma and Justice S. Kapoor delivered the verdict on 15th July 2023, addressing the rights of OCI card holders in seeking medical education opportunities.

The judgment revolves around a writ petition filed by a candidate who challenged the change of her status from an OCI candidate to an Indian national for PG medical seat admission. The petitioner sought relief under Article 32 of the Constitution, highlighting the critical issue of eligibility based on OCI status.

The Ministry of Home Affairs’ notification dated 04.03.2021, which withdrew certain privileges and eligibility criteria for OCI card holders, came under scrutiny. The Court observed, “The notification had a retroactive impact, altering the rights of OCI card holders in a manner that affected their eligibility for examinations like NEET.”

Citing the Court’s findings in the Anushka Rengunthwar case, the judgment emphasized the interpretation of the notification’s retroactive application. The Court ruled on the applicability of the notification to OCI card holders born before its issuance date, ensuring clarity on the matter.

The petitioner’s eligibility was examined based on her OCI status, and the Court directed that her eligibility be reconsidered for the remaining counseling rounds for PG medical seats. The directive emphasized the inclusion of OCI card holders who were issued cards before the notification’s implementation.

“The judgment reflects the Court’s commitment to ensuring equal opportunities for OCI card holders pursuing medical education in India,” remarked the bench. The ruling underscores the importance of fair and non-discriminatory treatment for OCI card holders, ensuring that their eligibility is considered on par with Indian nationals.

This landmark decision big relief for OCI card holders aspiring to pursue medical education in India, offering a renewed hope for equal educational opportunities.

D.D-01.09.2023.

PALLAVI vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.  

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/01-Sep-2023_Malikarjun_Vs_Vipin.pdf"]

Latest Legal News