No Work No Pay: Delhi High Court Denies Back Wages To Reinstated Army Officer State Cannot Use 'Delay & Laches' To Evade Compensation For Land Taken Without Authority Of Law: Calcutta High Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Jail Appeal Solely On 3157-Day Delay; Orders Release Of Life Convict After 22 Years In Jail 138 NI Act | Failure To Produce Income Tax Returns Not Fatal To Cheque Bounce Case If Debt Is Established: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Public Records Not In Party's 'Power Or Possession' Until Actually Obtained; Leave Not Required For Rebuttal Documents: AP High Court For Conviction Under Section 34 IPC, Prosecution Must Establish Prior Meeting Of Minds & Pre-Arranged Plan: Allahabad High Court Merciless Beating With Blunt Side Of Deadly Weapons To Spread Terror Constitutes Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court CIT Can’t Invoke Revisionary Jurisdiction Merely Because AO’s Enquiry Was ‘Inadequate’ If View Is Plausible: Bombay High Court Mere Presence At Crime Scene Without Proof Of Prior Concert Insufficient To Invoke Section 34 IPC For Murder: Supreme Court Courts Cannot Be Used As Tools For Coercion: Bombay HC Dismisses Application To Implead Developer Without Contractual Nexus, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost Specific Performance Cannot Be Granted For Contingent Contracts Dependent On Third-Party Conveyance: Madras High Court Unlawful Subletting Is A ‘Continuing Wrong’, Fresh Limitation Period Runs As Long As Breach Continues: Bombay High Court Courts Must Specify Payment Timeline In Specific Performance Decrees; Order XX Rule 12A CPC Is Mandatory: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Does Not Automatically Rescind Due To Delay; Courts Can Extend Time For Deposit: Supreme Court Madras High Court Quashes Forgery Case Against Mahindra World City After Victims Accept Alternate Land In Settlement Motor Accident Claims: 13-Day FIR Delay Not Fatal; 80% Physical Disability Can Be Treated As 100% Functional Disability: Punjab & Haryana HC Murderer Cannot Inherit Property From Victim Through Wills; Section 25 Hindu Succession Act Bar Applies To Testamentary Succession: Supreme Court Courts Must Pierce Veil Of Clever Drafting To Reject Suits Barred By Benami Law; 2016 Amendments Are Retrospective: Supreme Court Indian Railways Is A Consumer, Not A Deemed Distribution Licensee; Must Pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge For Open Access: Supreme Court Technical Rules Of Evidence Act Do Not Apply To Departmental Enquiries: Supreme Court Public Employment Cannot Be Converted Into An Instrument Of Fraud; Police Personnel Using Dual Identity Strikes At Root Of Service: Supreme Court

Not a Fit Case to Grant Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court in High-Profile Abduction and Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling today, the Kerala High Court, presided over by Justice Mohammed Nias C.P., denied anticipatory bail to Abdul Razaq @ Arikady Razaq in connection with two serious crimes involving allegations of abduction, assault, and murder. The court, in its rigorous assessment of the case, stated, “I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail,” emphasizing the gravity of the offenses and the need for an unimpeded investigation.

The two cases, registered as Crime Nos. 490/2022 and 493/2022 at Manjeswar Police Station, Kasargod, involve severe allegations against the petitioner. In one instance, the charges include abduction and assault, leading to severe bodily harm, while the other involves the murder of a person named Aboobacker Siddique, as alleged in the F.I.R.

During the hearing, the defense argued a lack of direct evidence connecting Razaq to the crimes, asserting that mere mention of his presence was insufficient for a connection to the alleged offenses. However, the prosecution presented a compelling case, highlighting the petitioner’s alleged role in planning and executing these heinous acts. The PostMortem Report of the deceased victim, revealing traumatic brain injury and internal bleeding due to multiple blunt injuries, bolstered the prosecution’s stance.

Justice Nias, in his ruling, underscored the serious nature of the allegations and the petitioner’s key role, stating, “Considering the key role played by the petitioner in a grave crime, I am of the view that the petitioner is not entitled to get anticipatory bail as it might adversely affect a proper investigation.” The judgment reflects the court’s commitment to ensuring that the investigation into these grave allegations is conducted thoroughly and without interference.

Date of Decision: 12th December 2023

ABDUL RAZAQ @ ARIKADY RAZAQ VS STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News