Non-Disclosure Of Medical Deformity While Seeking Re-Appointment Amounts To Deliberate Suppression, Termination Restored: Supreme Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Suit Based On Unregistered Gift Deed Not Maintainable; Plaint Liable For Rejection: Andhra Pradesh High Court Accused Has No Blanket Immunity From Re-Arrest If Initial Arrest Was Declared Illegal Only On Technical Grounds: Punjab & Haryana High Court Father’s Obligation To Maintain Minor Child Under Section 125 CrPC Is Absolute Even If Mother Is Also Earning: Uttarakhand High Court Variation In Physical Signature No Ground To Reject Bid If Submitted Via Secure Digital Signature Certificate: Orissa High Court Management Cannot Re-Examine Selection After Candidate Alters Position By Leaving Previous Job: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Production Of E-Way Bills Not Proof Of Physical Movement Of Goods; GST Registration Can Be Cancelled For Fake ITC Claims: Madras High Court Employer Cannot Abuse Unequal Bargaining Power To Deny Back Wages For Period Of Eligibility: Supreme Court Restores Dues Of MSRTC Employee Entire Bank Account Of Educational Institution Cannot Be Frozen Merely Because It Received Fees From Accused Parent: Karnataka High Court CARA Must Facilitate Relocation Of Children Adopted Under HAMA; Cannot Abdicate Responsibility By Issuing Mere 'Support Letters': Delhi High Court Valid Caste Certificate Issued By Competent Authority Is Sine Qua Non To Establish Offence Under SC/ST Act: Chhattisgarh High Court Shifting Defense From 'No Transaction' To 'Transaction Not Proved' Prima Facie Shows Dishonest Intent Since Inception: Calcutta High Court Sugar Exports Under Specific Permission Cannot Be Treated As 'Restricted' To Deny RoDTEP Benefits: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Rejects Bail Of Man Who Killed Bystander While Aiming At Another; Invokes 'Doctrine Of Transfer Of Malice' SDO Cannot Reclassify Public Utility Land To Grant Private Leases; Such Pattas Are Void Ab Initio: Supreme Court DNA Test Report Prevails Over Presumption Of Legitimacy Under Section 112 Evidence Act If Report Is Undisputed: Supreme Court Foreign Summary Judgment Passed After Refusing Leave To Defend Is Not 'On Merits' Under Section 13 CPC: Supreme Court Constitutional Safeguards Don’t End At Prison Gates: Supreme Court Extends Mandatory Disability Rights Directions To All States & UTs Courts Not Bound By Low Govt Rates For Prosthetic Limbs; Claimants Entitled To Choose Private Centres For 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Reject Plaint Over Insufficient Court Fee Without Giving Mandatory Opportunity To Correct Valuation: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders Immediate Removal Of Illegal Encroachments On National Highways; Bans New Dhabas Within Right Of Way

Not a Fit Case to Grant Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court in High-Profile Abduction and Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling today, the Kerala High Court, presided over by Justice Mohammed Nias C.P., denied anticipatory bail to Abdul Razaq @ Arikady Razaq in connection with two serious crimes involving allegations of abduction, assault, and murder. The court, in its rigorous assessment of the case, stated, “I do not think that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail,” emphasizing the gravity of the offenses and the need for an unimpeded investigation.

The two cases, registered as Crime Nos. 490/2022 and 493/2022 at Manjeswar Police Station, Kasargod, involve severe allegations against the petitioner. In one instance, the charges include abduction and assault, leading to severe bodily harm, while the other involves the murder of a person named Aboobacker Siddique, as alleged in the F.I.R.

During the hearing, the defense argued a lack of direct evidence connecting Razaq to the crimes, asserting that mere mention of his presence was insufficient for a connection to the alleged offenses. However, the prosecution presented a compelling case, highlighting the petitioner’s alleged role in planning and executing these heinous acts. The PostMortem Report of the deceased victim, revealing traumatic brain injury and internal bleeding due to multiple blunt injuries, bolstered the prosecution’s stance.

Justice Nias, in his ruling, underscored the serious nature of the allegations and the petitioner’s key role, stating, “Considering the key role played by the petitioner in a grave crime, I am of the view that the petitioner is not entitled to get anticipatory bail as it might adversely affect a proper investigation.” The judgment reflects the court’s commitment to ensuring that the investigation into these grave allegations is conducted thoroughly and without interference.

Date of Decision: 12th December 2023

ABDUL RAZAQ @ ARIKADY RAZAQ VS STATE OF KERALA

 

Latest Legal News