High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

No Willful Disobedience of the Order — Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition on Compassionate Appointment Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Punjab and Haryana delivered a verdict on September 11, dismissing a contempt petition filed by Sarabjit Kaur, the widow of the original writ petitioner Amandeep Singh. The Court observed that there was “no willful disobedience of the order dated 14.08.2019” and granted the petitioner liberty to avail alternative remedies under the law.

Amandeep Singh initially filed the writ petition seeking compassionate benefits following the death of his father, Bhupinder Singh, a government servant. The Court had earlier set aside an order that denied him these benefits, directing the respondents to “reconsider the application of the petitioner in accordance with prevalent applicable Policy.”

After Amandeep Singh’s passing, his widow, Sarabjit Kaur, took up the case. An application for clarification on the original order was also disposed of, indicating that the case should be considered “as per the policy, prevalent as on the date of death of the father of the petitioner.”

The main point of contention was whether Sarabjit Kaur, being the daughter-in-law of the deceased government servant, is eligible for the compassionate benefits under the existing policy. While counsel for the respondent argued that she was not a dependent person under the policy, the petitioner’s counsel referred to a new State Government scheme that could potentially include her.

 In its final observation, the Court stated, “It is a disputed fact whether the petitioner, being the daughter-in-law of the deceased employee, is covered in the policy or not, which cannot be decided in the present contempt petition.” Therefore, the contempt petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner the liberty to explore alternative legal remedies.

The judgement underlines the complexities involved in compassionate appointments and leaves room for future legal deliberations on the subject.

Date of decision: 11.09.2023

Sarbjeet Kaur  vs Baldev Singh Saran and Others       

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Sarbjeet_Kaur_vs_Baldev_Singh_Saran_And_Others_on_11_September_2023_PH.pdf"]

Latest Legal News