Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

No Vested Right for Foreign National Quota in Current Academic Year: Delhi HC Dismisses Appeal for Admission in Integrated Law Program

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal by a foreign national student seeking admission in the integrated five-year law program at the University of Delhi. The Court held that no vested right had accrued in favor of the appellant for admission under the foreign national quota for the academic year 2023-2024.

Legal Point of the Judgement: The core legal issue revolved around the claim of a foreign student to a supernumerary quota in the newly introduced integrated law programs at the University of Delhi. The appellant argued that based on the University's policy, there should have been a 10% quota for foreign nationals, which was not provided in this case.

Facts and Issues: The appellant registered for admission in 2023 but found no option for foreign nationals to apply for the new five-year integrated law programs. A writ petition was filed seeking mandamus against the University for not providing the said quota. The single judge dismissed this petition, leading to the present appeal.

Court's Assessment: The High Court carefully analyzed the submissions and the relevant documents, including the Bulletin of Information (BOI) and the Academic Council's resolutions. It was observed that while there were provisions for certain quotas, such as the 'UoD Ward Quota' and 'Orphans Quota', there was no specific quota for foreign nationals for the academic year 2023-2024. The Court noted that the BOI applicable at the time of the launch of the program did not include these programs, and thus, the appellant's reliance on these documents was misplaced.

Decision: The Court concluded that there was no provision for a foreign national quota in the integrated law programs for the academic year 2023-2024 and dismissed the appeal. It was also observed that the University had decided to introduce such a quota from the next academic year, 2024-2025. The appellant was advised that they could apply for the upcoming academic year under the foreign national quota.

Date of Decision: February 13, 2024.

Maahi Neil Jaipal vs. University of Delhi & Ors.

Latest Legal News