District Judiciary Retirement Age | Supreme Court Directs Enhancement To 62 Years To Arrest Attrition Of Judicial Talent Slogans Inciting Armed Rebellion Or Challenging Sovereignty Cannot Be Equated With Religious Expressions: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail Revisional Authority Under AP ROR Act Has Jurisdiction To Direct Inquiry Into Illegal Transfers Of Assigned Land: Andhra Pradesh High Court Indian Law Does Not Recognise 'Joint Parenting' As A Statutory Concept; Child Welfare Remains Paramount: Bombay High Court Order 26 Rule 9 CPC | Court Must Appoint Survey-Knowing Commissioner In Suits Alleging Physical Encroachment And Boundary Disputes: Calcutta High Court Section 33-C(2) ID Act | Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Recover Consequential Benefits Arising From CAT Orders: Delhi High Court Order VIII Rule 1-A(3) CPC | Procedural Law Is Meant For Advancement Of Justice; Technicalities Should Not Scuttle Opportunity To Lead Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court High Court Can Condition Condonation Of Delay In Land Acquisition Appeals Upon Waiver Of Interest For Delayed Period: Bombay High Court Employees Compensation Act | Insurance Company Not Liable To Indemnify Penalty Imposed On Employer Under Section 4-A(3)(b): Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees’ Compensation Act | Failure To Frame Issue On Employer-Employee Relationship Vitiates Commissioner’s Award: Kerala High Court Default Bail Under Section 187 BNSS | Period Of Investigation Depends On Substance Of Allegations In FIR, Not Merely Mentioned Sections: Madhya Pradesh High Court SARFAESI Act | Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Must Be Challenged Under Section 17 Before DRT, Not Via Writ Petition: Kerala High Court

No Vested Right for Foreign National Quota in Current Academic Year: Delhi HC Dismisses Appeal for Admission in Integrated Law Program

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal by a foreign national student seeking admission in the integrated five-year law program at the University of Delhi. The Court held that no vested right had accrued in favor of the appellant for admission under the foreign national quota for the academic year 2023-2024.

Legal Point of the Judgement: The core legal issue revolved around the claim of a foreign student to a supernumerary quota in the newly introduced integrated law programs at the University of Delhi. The appellant argued that based on the University's policy, there should have been a 10% quota for foreign nationals, which was not provided in this case.

Facts and Issues: The appellant registered for admission in 2023 but found no option for foreign nationals to apply for the new five-year integrated law programs. A writ petition was filed seeking mandamus against the University for not providing the said quota. The single judge dismissed this petition, leading to the present appeal.

Court's Assessment: The High Court carefully analyzed the submissions and the relevant documents, including the Bulletin of Information (BOI) and the Academic Council's resolutions. It was observed that while there were provisions for certain quotas, such as the 'UoD Ward Quota' and 'Orphans Quota', there was no specific quota for foreign nationals for the academic year 2023-2024. The Court noted that the BOI applicable at the time of the launch of the program did not include these programs, and thus, the appellant's reliance on these documents was misplaced.

Decision: The Court concluded that there was no provision for a foreign national quota in the integrated law programs for the academic year 2023-2024 and dismissed the appeal. It was also observed that the University had decided to introduce such a quota from the next academic year, 2024-2025. The appellant was advised that they could apply for the upcoming academic year under the foreign national quota.

Date of Decision: February 13, 2024.

Maahi Neil Jaipal vs. University of Delhi & Ors.

Latest Legal News