Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

No Seal of Court on Adulterous Conduct – High Court Dismisses Plea for Protection in Live-in Relationship

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari, dismissed a petition seeking protection for a couple in a live-in relationship. The court notably stated that it will not “obliquely obtain the seal of this Court on their conduct,” highlighting the legal complexities surrounding live-in relationships and adultery.

The petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, sought protection of life and liberty against threats from family members. The petitioners, Reena Devi and another, claimed they were living together since September 2023 and faced threats from the family of petitioner No.1. However, the court found the allegations to be unsubstantiated by convincing evidence.

Justice Tiwari critically observed that petitioner No.2, who is still legally married and in the midst of a divorce case, is living a “lustful and adulterous life” with petitioner No.1. This relationship potentially falls under the ambit of Sections 494/495 of the IPC, governing adultery.

The judgment emphasized the lack of convincing material supporting the petitioners’ allegations of threats. The court remarked, “Such bald and vague allegations cannot be readily and naively accepted,” indicating a stringent approach towards claims lacking substantial evidence.

The case underscores the legal scrutiny live-in relationships undergo, especially involving individuals still legally married. The court’s decision to dismiss the petition reflects its stance on not endorsing relationships that might contravene existing laws on adultery.

Mr. Virender Singh, advocate for the petitioners, represented their case but was unable to sway the court’s opinion, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

This judgment is expected to have significant implications for similar cases involving live-in relationships and the legal boundaries of personal liberty and societal norms.

Date of Decision:November 06, 2023

REENA DEVI AND ANR   VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS     

Latest Legal News