Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

No One Can Be Denied Already Granted Benefit Without Due Process: High Court Demands Fair Play in Promotions

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the principles of justice and fair administrative practice in government promotions, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, led by Hon'ble Justice Jagmohan Bansal, issued a landmark judgment yesterday. The court emphasized the critical need for due process in administrative actions, particularly in matters of promotions and seniority.

The case, involving a group of petitioners from the Punjab Home Guards and Civil Defense department, revolved around a contentious seniority list that seemingly disadvantaged the petitioners despite their earlier promotions. Justice Bansal, in his ruling, asserted, “No one can be denied already granted benefit without issuing show cause notice followed by opportunity of hearing.” This statement has resonated across administrative and legal circles, highlighting the court's commitment to ensuring that due procedures are followed in governmental decisions.

The petitioners, initially promoted to Havildar Instructors and then to Platoon Commanders, found themselves in a predicament when their retrospective promotions were not acknowledged in the department's seniority list. They approached the High Court seeking redressal and the setting aside of the contested seniority list.

Delving into the intricacies of the case, Justice Bansal pointed out the flaws in the administrative process. He noted that the respondent's actions amounted to recalling previous promotion orders without proper notice and hearing, which is contrary to the principles of natural justice and administrative fairness.

The court directed the State to issue show cause notices and provide a hearing opportunity to the petitioners before finalizing the seniority list. This decision is expected to have far-reaching implications, especially in reinforcing the rule of law and procedural fairness in governmental actions.

Date of Decision: 12.01.2024

MOHANDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS  VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS         

 

Latest Legal News