Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

No Notional Interest Adjustment for Debt-Free Companies: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court of Delhi, in a recent judgment, dismissed an appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-04, Delhi, against M/S Inductis India Pvt. Ltd. The bench, comprising Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Justice Girish Kathpalia, delivered the verdict on December 4, 2023, marking a conclusion to the case registered under ITA 175/2019.

The case focused on the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the determination of Arm’s Length Price in international transactions. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) had earlier made a decision regarding these matters, which was challenged by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax.

The High Court upheld the ITAT’s deletion of disallowance under Section 14A of the Act, noting that the respondent was a debt-free company and hence, did not utilize borrowed funds for investments in mutual funds.

The Court agreed with the ITAT’s assessment that no adjustment was required for notional interest on receivables from associated establishments, as the respondent company was debt-free.

The exclusion of Accentia Technologies Ltd. And TCS E-Serve Ltd. From the list of comparables for transfer pricing by the ITAT was upheld by the High Court.

The respondent, M/S Inductis India Pvt. Ltd., had filed its return of income in the year 2012, which was selected for scrutiny assessment, leading to the issuance of notices under various sections of the Income Tax Act. The subsequent assessment and orders by the ITAT led to the filing of this appeal by the Income Tax Department.

The High Court’s decision to dismiss the appeal indicates a validation of the ITAT’s earlier ruling. The judgment provides clarity on the application of Section 14A of the Income Tax Act in cases where the company is debt-free and on the assessment of international transactions under the Act.

Date of Decision: 04.12.2023

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME VS M/S INDUCTIS INDIA PVT. LTD.       

Latest Legal News