Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction When Death Is Caused by an Unforeseeable Forest Fire, Criminal Prosecution Cannot Be Sustained Without Proof of Rashness, Negligence, or Knowledge: Supreme Court Proof of Accident Alone is Not Enough – Claimants Must Prove Involvement of Offending Vehicle Under Section 166 MV Act: Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Compensation in Fatal Road Accident Case Income Tax | Search Means Search, Not ‘Other Person’: Section 153C Collapses When the Assessee Himself Is Searched: Karnataka High Court Draws a Clear Red Line License Fee on Hoardings is Regulatory, Not Tax; GST Does Not Bar Municipal Levy: Bombay High Court Filing Forged Bank Statement to Mislead Court in Maintenance Case Is Prima Facie Offence Under Section 466 IPC: Allahabad High Court Upholds Summoning Continued Cruelty and Concealment of Infertility Justify Divorce: Chhattisgarh High Court Upholds Divorce Disguising Punishment as Simplicity Is Abuse of Power: Delhi High Court Quashes Dismissals of Civil Defence Volunteers for Being Stigmatic, Not Simpliciter Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD"

Bar Council of India Mandates Criminal Background Checks, Biometric Attendance, and Strict Employment Declarations for Law Students

25 September 2024 1:08 PM

By: sayum


Failure to Disclose Criminal Background or Employment Will Lead to Withholding of Degrees” – Bar Council of India Issues New Guidelines for Law Students. Bar Council of India (BCI) issued a significant notification aimed at enhancing transparency, accountability, and ethical standards in legal education across the country. The notification mandates law students to submit declarations regarding their criminal background, employment status, and academic compliance. It further introduces biometric attendance systems and the installation of CCTV cameras in all law schools and Centers of Legal Education (CLEs). This directive follows judicial observations on the need for greater scrutiny of law students' backgrounds and behavior, ensuring that only those with clean records and ethical standing are allowed to enter the legal profession.

The legal profession demands the highest standards of integrity and ethics, and the BCI has been entrusted with regulating this through the Advocates Act, 1961. This latest move by the BCI comes in response to growing concerns about law students potentially entering the profession with undisclosed criminal backgrounds or engaging in simultaneous degree programs and employment that could compromise their legal education. The notification applies to all law students pursuing an LL.B. degree in India and places the onus on CLEs to ensure compliance.

Criminal Background Check: Law students must now declare any pending or past criminal cases before receiving their final marksheet and degree. If any student has been involved in a criminal case, whether convicted or acquitted, they must report it to their CLE, which in turn must notify the BCI. The BCI will decide on a case-by-case basis whether the student is fit to receive their law degree. Non-disclosure will result in disciplinary actions, including withholding of degrees.

"All such cases must be reported to the BCI, and institutions must await the BCI's decision before issuing the final marksheet and degree."

Simultaneous Degrees and Regular Academic Programs: In accordance with Chapter II, Rule 6 of the Rules of Legal Education (2008), law students are barred from pursuing any other simultaneous degree or regular academic program during their LL.B. studies, except for short-term or part-time certificate courses in areas like language or computer applications. CLEs are instructed not to issue final marksheets or degrees to any student found violating this rule.

Employment Status and Attendance Compliance: The notification reiterates the rule that law students must not be engaged in any employment during the course of their studies unless they have obtained a valid No Objection Certificate (NOC) from their employer. Law students must also prove their compliance with attendance norms as per Rule 12 of the BCI Rules of Legal Education. Institutions failing to enforce this will be subject to disciplinary action by the BCI.

"It is made clear that no one will be allowed to be enrolled in any State Bar Council if they fail to inform the BCI and obtain an NOC from their employer."

Biometric Attendance and CCTV Surveillance: CLEs are required to install biometric attendance systems to ensure accurate tracking of student attendance. In addition, CCTV cameras must be installed in classrooms and key areas within the institution. The recordings must be preserved for one year for potential use in investigations related to attendance or student conduct.

 

The BCI has made it clear that both students and CLEs will face strict penalties for non-compliance. Students who fail to disclose criminal backgrounds, employment status, or simultaneous academic pursuits will not receive their final marksheets or degrees. Similarly, institutions that fail to implement the BCI's directives could face de-recognition or disaffiliation.

This move by the BCI places significant responsibility on CLEs to monitor and report on the status of their students. It reflects the BCI's broader efforts to ensure that only qualified, ethical individuals enter the legal profession. The criminal background check system, in particular, addresses a growing concern about the character and suitability of individuals who will ultimately practice law in the country.

Moreover, the biometric attendance and CCTV surveillance requirements are aimed at increasing transparency within law schools, ensuring that students meet attendance norms and conduct themselves appropriately during their education.

The Bar Council of India's new directives are set to bring sweeping changes to how law students are monitored and assessed during their education. With stricter measures on criminal background checks, employment declarations, and attendance monitoring, the BCI aims to ensure that the future legal professionals of India meet the highest standards of ethics, accountability, and integrity. Both law students and educational institutions must now adapt to these changes to maintain compliance and uphold the reputation of the legal profession in India.

 

 

Latest Legal News