Section 84 BNSS | Mechanical Declaration as ‘Proclaimed Person’ Without Due Procedure Illegal: Punjab & Haryana High Court Bail is the Exception, Not the Rule in NDPS Cases Involving Commercial Quantity: Himachal Pradesh High Court Denies Bail in ₹5 Crore Drug Racket Adopted Son Is Class I Heir—Collateral Relatives Cannot Challenge Will in Probate Court: Madras High Court Assignment of Leasehold Rights is Transfer of Immovable Property, Not Supply of Services: Bombay High Court Quashes GST Show Cause Notice Against Aerocom Irretrievable Breakdown Is Cruelty in Itself When the Marriage Has Become a Legal Fiction: Calcutta High Court Grants Divorce Sexual Intercourse by Deceitful Means Attracts Prima Facie Offence Under Section 69 BNS: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Criminal Proceedings in False Promise of Marriage Case Scheduled Areas Are Constitutionally Protected, Not Constitutionally Frozen: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Municipal Inclusion of Tribal Territories Death of Innocents Due to Spurious Liquor Is a Serious Blow to Society—Bail Cannot Be Granted Merely Because Viscera Reports Are Inconclusive: Orissa High Court When the Sole Eyewitness Is Dead, Confession Alone Can’t Convict: Madras High Court Acquits Chain Snatching Accused Office of Advocate in Residential Building Not a Commercial Use: MP High Court Absence of Judicial Satisfaction Renders Declaration Under Section 82 CrPC Illegal: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PO Order No Entitlement to Interest Beyond 1.5% Without Agreed Terms: MP High Court Dismisses Creditors' Appeals Against Official Liquidator's Adjudication Supervisory Jurisdiction Is Not Appellate Review : Kerala High Court Refuses to Interfere with Pension Reduction Ordered Without Regular Disciplinary Enquiry Revenue Authorities Cannot Alter Mutation of Acquired Land Based on ‘Recalled’ Judicial Orders: Karnataka High Court Section 45 Cannot Justify Indefinite Detention - Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Defeats Article 21: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 223 BNSS | No Cognizance Without Complainant's Oath: Gauhati High Court 304A IPC | No Presumption of Rash Driving Merely Because of Accident: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Child Death Case Auction Purchaser Has No Absolute Right: Calcutta High Court Upholds Borrower's Right of Redemption Under SARFAESI Act 15 Days’ Notice Under TP Act Is Sufficient To Terminate Monthly Tenancy After Lease Expiry: Bombay High Court Indefinite Blacklisting Without Authority or Hearing is Civil Death in Disguise: Allahabad High Court Environmental Tribunal Cannot Be A Toothless Watchdog… It Must Act Without Waiting For The Metaphorical Godot: Andhra Pradesh High Court FIR Lodged After Marital Breakdown Based on “Emotional Outburst”, Not Rape: Himachal Pradesh High Court Quashes Case Post-Divorce SARFAESI | Deposit Before Bank Can’t Be Treated as Statutory Pre-Deposit Before DRAT: Kerala High Court Truth Cannot Be Gagged by Injunction: Madras High Court Refuses Celebrity Chef’s Plea to Restrain Allegedly Defamatory Social Media Posts on Intimate Relationship Probate Not Mandatory for Will Executed in Keonjhar – Civil Court Can Decide Title Based on Unprobated Will: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Daughter’s Suit Against Valid Gift to Nephew

No Need to Hand Over Original Records When Copies of Approved FMB Are Available: Kerala High Court Upholds Resurvey Validity in Land Encroachment Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court today dismissed a writ petition that contested the legality of a resurvey conducted by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) regarding a land encroachment dispute. The Court upheld the resurvey’s validity, clarifying that copies of the original Field Measurement Book (FMB) were sufficient for the purpose, negating the need for original acquisition records.

The contention centered around the petitioner, Krishnan N.T., who alleged that the NHAI and associated respondents encroached beyond the designated boundaries set during the 1987 land acquisition for highway expansion. Conversely, the respondents maintained that the petitioner had removed original survey stones, thus encroaching on the highway land himself.

The core issue addressed the correctness of land boundaries post the 1987 acquisition and the legality of the resurvey operations conducted subsequently. The petitioner argued that the resurvey was flawed as it allegedly proceeded without the original records.

Land Ownership and Encroachment: The Court confirmed that the resurvey operations authenticated the original boundaries, asserting that “the availability of copies of approved FMB suffices, eliminating the need for original records” for resurvey purposes.

Validity of Resurvey Procedures: Justice Viju Abraham emphasized that “the resurvey was conducted in accordance with proper administrative procedures, utilizing available records and adhering to court directions.”

Judicial Review and Administrative Action: It was underscored that the administrative actions were compliant with prior judicial directives, leading to the rejection of the petitioner’s claims due to the absence of conclusive evidence of an improper resurvey.

Decision: The High Court dismissed the writ petition, confirming the validity of the resurvey conducted by the respondents. The petitioner was granted one month to appeal the decision while maintaining an interim order.

Date of Decision: April 19, 2024

Krishnan N.T. vs. The District Collector, Kozhikode & Others

Latest Legal News