MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

No More Monday Check-Ins: Supreme Court Lifts Weekly Reporting Requirement for Journalist Siddique Kappan in Hathras Case

04 November 2024 4:39 PM

By: sayum


On November 4, 2024, the Supreme Court modified a key bail condition imposed on Kerala journalist Siddique Kappan, who had been connected to the alleged Hathras conspiracy case. A bench comprising Justices P.S. Narasimha and Sandeep Mehta allowed Kappan’s application, relieving him of the requirement to report to a police station in Uttar Pradesh every Monday.

"Order dated 9th September 2022 is modified and it shall not be necessary for the petitioner to report to the local police station. The other prayers made in the present application can be independently agitated," recorded the Supreme Court in its ruling.

Kappan, who had been incarcerated for nearly two years before being granted bail in September 2022, faced stringent conditions as part of his release. These included mandatory weekly check-ins at a local police station every Monday for the first six weeks, after which he was permitted to return to Kerala but required to continue the practice there. Other conditions mandated Kappan to surrender his passport and restricted him from leaving Delhi without the trial court's permission.

Kappan was initially detained by Uttar Pradesh police in October 2020 while en route to report on the Hathras rape-murder case. Arrested under the apprehension of a breach of peace, he was later charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Authorities accused him and his co-passengers of intending to incite communal unrest and disrupt social order following the incident.

The Supreme Court's decision to modify the bail conditions marks a significant shift in Kappan’s case, easing the stringent requirements imposed during his release.

Siddique Kappan v. State of Uttar Pradesh

 

 

Latest Legal News