Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

No Maintenance for Wife Living Separately Without Reasonable Cause: Jharkhand HC Applies Section 125(4) CrPC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Jharkhand High Court has set aside the lower court’s order granting maintenance to a wife living separately from her husband without sufficient reason, underlining the provisions of Section 125(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

The Court focused on the eligibility for maintenance under Section 125(4) of the CrPC, which precludes a wife from receiving maintenance if she is living separately from her husband without sufficient reason.

The case involved a marital dispute between Amit Kumar Kachhap and Sangeeta Toppo, with allegations of dowry demands, cruelty, and adultery. Sangeeta Toppo accused Amit of cruelty and adultery, leading to her leaving the matrimonial home. Amit contended that Sangeeta left voluntarily and even remarried, disentitling her to maintenance.

The Court meticulously evaluated the testimonies and evidence presented. Sangeeta Toppo and her mother testified about the alleged cruelty and dowry demands, but contradictions arose regarding Sangeeta’s claims of pregnancy and abortion. Amit Kumar Kachhap and his witnesses challenged these claims, insisting on her voluntary abandonment and subsequent remarriage.

The Court noted, "In view of the overall evidence adduced, it is found that the respondent-applicant has been residing aloof from the husband without any reasonable cause.” The prescription from Dr. Indu Chouhan, which indicated Sangeeta’s pregnancy, was a critical piece of evidence that contradicted her claims.

Decision: The High Court ruled that Sangeeta Toppo was not entitled to maintenance, as she failed to establish a reasonable cause for living separately from her husband. The Court set aside the lower court’s order that had granted her a monthly maintenance of Rs. 15,000.

Date of Decision:  February 2, 2024

Amit Kumar Kachhap vs. Sangeeta Toppo,

Latest Legal News