Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

No Coercive Steps – PB&HR HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 On Wednesday, the Punjab & Haryana High Court ordered the Punjab Police not to take any coercive action against director Farah Khan, actress Raveena Tandon, writer Abbas Aziz Dala, comedian Bharti Singh, and Frames Production in relation to a FIR filed against them for allegedly offending religious sentiments in a web series titled Backbenchers distributed by Flipkart.

These directives were issued in response to a petition to quash a 295A IPC FIR.

According to the FIR, the accused offended the religious sensibilities of Christians by comparing the word Hallelujah to a vulgar word and by treating the word with contempt.

Advocate Abhinav Sood, representing the petitioners, argued that the FIR fails to identify the elements of the offence under section 295A of the Indian Penal Code.

Mr. Sood also asserted that the complainant's allegations are broad and ambiguous, and that there is an ulterior motive to impose criminal liability on the petitioners.

The attorney cited Bhagwati Charan Shukla vs. Provincial Government and Ramji Lal vs. the State of UP to argue that the FIR contains false information.

The Bench of Justice Karamjit Singh issued a notice of motion for December 5, 2022 and ordered that no coercive measures be taken against the accused until that date.

D.D:- 1 june, 2022

Raveena Tandon & Ors V/s. State of Punjab & Ors 

Latest Legal News