SARFAESI Act | Sale Certificate Cannot Be Issued In Favour Of A Third-Party Nominee Who Was Not The Auction Bidder: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Auction Sale Conducted In Violation Of Mandatory Rules And Subsisting Restraint Order Is Vitiated In Law: Supreme Court Recovery Of Alleged Overpayment From A Separate, Unrelated Contract Without Notice Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Supreme Court IBC | Adjudicating Authority Has Power To Recall CIRP Admission Order If It Was Obtained Through Fraud Or Collusion: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Presumption Of Service Is Attracted Once Notice Is Dispatched To Correct Address Of Drawer: Supreme Court Operation Of Hookah Bars In Restaurants Constitutes Violation Of Rule 4(3) Of COTPA Rules: Allahabad High Court High Court Cannot Recall Order Passed On Merits Even If Passed Ex-Parte: Bombay High Court Administrative Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Having Civil Consequences Without Meaningful Consideration Of The Affected Employee’s Response: Allahabad High Court Discharge Application Cannot Be Converted Into A 'Mini-Trial' To Assess Evidentiary Sufficiency: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Allegations Are Falsified By Documents Annexed To Plaint Or Based On Non-Existent Law: Bombay High Court Police Cannot Interfere In Pending Civil Disputes Or Act As Arbitrators In Private Property Conflicts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Contract For Personal Services Between Doctor And Hospital Is Determinable And Not Specifically Enforceable: Calcutta High Court Allegations Of Sexual Offences Cannot Be Quashed Based On Contradictory Evidence Requiring Mini-Trial: Delhi High Court PMLA Adjudication | Failure To Expressly Discuss Every Submission In Written Synopsis Does Not Vitiate Order Under Principles Of Natural Justice: Karnataka High Court Prolonged Separation Of Sixteen Years Constitutes Cruelty Under Special Marriage Act: Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court

No Coercive Steps – PB&HR HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 On Wednesday, the Punjab & Haryana High Court ordered the Punjab Police not to take any coercive action against director Farah Khan, actress Raveena Tandon, writer Abbas Aziz Dala, comedian Bharti Singh, and Frames Production in relation to a FIR filed against them for allegedly offending religious sentiments in a web series titled Backbenchers distributed by Flipkart.

These directives were issued in response to a petition to quash a 295A IPC FIR.

According to the FIR, the accused offended the religious sensibilities of Christians by comparing the word Hallelujah to a vulgar word and by treating the word with contempt.

Advocate Abhinav Sood, representing the petitioners, argued that the FIR fails to identify the elements of the offence under section 295A of the Indian Penal Code.

Mr. Sood also asserted that the complainant's allegations are broad and ambiguous, and that there is an ulterior motive to impose criminal liability on the petitioners.

The attorney cited Bhagwati Charan Shukla vs. Provincial Government and Ramji Lal vs. the State of UP to argue that the FIR contains false information.

The Bench of Justice Karamjit Singh issued a notice of motion for December 5, 2022 and ordered that no coercive measures be taken against the accused until that date.

D.D:- 1 june, 2022

Raveena Tandon & Ors V/s. State of Punjab & Ors 

Latest Legal News