Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

No Abduction in Mother's Act of Taking Her Children – Anticipatory Bail Granted: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, led by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, declared that a mother taking her children cannot be termed as abduction. The statement came during the pronouncement of anticipatory bail in favor of Preeti Bansal, who was embroiled in a complex custody battle involving allegations of child abduction and ransom demands.

The case, recorded under Neutral Citation No.2023:PHHC:141792, revolved around FIR No.64 dated 08.08.2023 under Section 384 IPC at the Police Station Punjab Agriculture University (PAU), District Ludhiana. The petitioner, Preeti Bansal, was accused of abducting her two children, Moulik and Khushi, from her ex-husband, Deepak Bansal, and his parents, and demanding a substantial amount of money for their return.

Justice Deepak Gupta, in his landmark judgment, observed, "Once it is so, the petitioner along with her husband became the lawful guardians of her children. Even if it be assumed that petitioner has taken away her children, it cannot be stated that she has abducted them." This observation formed the cornerstone of the court's decision to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The court delved into the intricate details of the petitioner’s marital history, the divorce proceedings, allegations of physical relations post-divorce, and the subsequent remarriage. The judgment highlighted that the allegations of demanding money in exchange for the children’s custody will be a matter of trial.

This ruling sets a precedent in cases involving complex family disputes, particularly emphasizing the rights and roles of parents in the guardianship of their children. The court's decision underscores the necessity of a nuanced approach in cases where familial relationships and custody issues intersect with legal proceedings.

The case saw Mr. Naveen Bawa advocating for the petitioner, while Mr. Randeep Singh Khaira, DAG, Punjab, and Mr. Vishal Aggarwal represented the respondent and the complainant, respectively.

The High Court's decision is seen as a pivotal moment in the legal landscape surrounding custody disputes, emphasizing the importance of context and the roles of parents in such sensitive matters.

Date of Decision: Pronounced on November 7, 2023

Preeti Bansal VS State of Punjab       

Latest Legal News