Contradictions In Eyewitness Accounts And Suppression Of Crucial Evidence Weaken The Prosecution's Case: Telangana High Court High Court of Sikkim Sets Aside Trial Court’s Decision on Maintainability of Suit: Preliminary Issues Must Be Purely of Law Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Procedure, Says High Court Writ Petitions Against Civil Court Orders Must Be Under Article 227: Patna High Court Reiterates Jurisdictional Boundaries Kerala High Court Upholds Eviction, Rejects Sub-Tenant's Kudikidappu Claim Contractual Employment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization: Jharkhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act for Past Domestic Violence: Bombay High Court Tenants Cannot Prescribe How Landlords Utilize Their Property: Delhi High Court Validates Eviction Labour Commissioner to Decide Petitioner’s Date of Birth Claim within Three Months, Ensuring Proper Verification and Consideration of Evidence: Uttarakhand High Court Concealment of Health Condition and False Allegations Amount to Cruelty: Gujarat High Court Upholds Divorce Decree Possession Implies Constructive Notice: Duty to Inquire Rests on Subsequent Purchasers: Supreme Court Clarifies Bona Fide Purchase Standards Judicial Proceedings Cannot Be Instituted After Four Years: MP High Court in Quashing FIR Against Retired Engineer Orissa High Court Invalidates Lecturer Recruitment Advertisements for Non-Compliance with UGC Standards Public Interest Jurisdiction Not a Substitute for Private Litigation: Karnataka High Court Declines PIL Cognizance under Section 188 IPC is illegal without a public servant’s complaint:Kerala High Court Juvenile Justice Act Prevails Over Recruitment Rules: Madras High Court Rules Juvenile Records Cannot Bar Employment in Police Services" Calcutta High Court Quashes MR Distributorship Selection Due to Irregularities in Godown Compliance and Selection Process Once the driver has established the validity of his license, the insurer cannot escape liability without conclusive proof to the contrary: J&K HC Belated Claims Cannot Be Entertained: Kerala High Court Overturns CAT Decision on Date of Birth Correction DNA Tests Cannot Supersede Established Legal Presumptions: Himachal Pradesh HC Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides VAT Act: Secured Creditor's Charge Has Priority Over State's Tax Dues: Gujrat High Court High Court of Delhi Clarifies Jurisdiction in Commercial Dispute: 'Procedural Efficiency Must Be Upheld Power Under Section 319 CrPC Cannot Be Exercised Without Prima Facie Case Beyond Contradictions: Supreme Court Motive Alone Insufficient for Conviction Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Supreme Court Ensures Equal Financial Benefits for All High Court Judges: Discrimination Based on Recruitment Source Struck Down Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Four Accused: Cites Contradictory Dying Declarations and Lack of Independent Evidence in Murder Case Evidence Corroborates Violent Robbery and Recovery of Stolen Articles: Calcutta High Court Upholds Conviction in Burrabazar Dacoity Case Failure to Implead Contesting Candidates is Fatal; Fundamental Defect Cannot Be Cured: Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Magistrate Not Functus Officio Post-Final Order in Maintenance Cases: Allahabad High Court Substantial Questions of Law a Must in Second Appeals, Reiterates Andhra Pradesh High Court Inconsistencies and Procedural Lapses: Allahabad High Court Acquits Four in Neeta Singh Murder Case

Neglect to Maintain Justifies Separate Residence - High Court Upholds Maintenance Award in Domestic Violence Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, presided over by Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu, affirmed the maintenance order passed by the Family Court in Anantapur, in a case involving allegations of dowry harassment and domestic violence. The court's decision came in the wake of Criminal Revision Cases No. 1477 of 2015 and 1562 of 2015, concerning a marital dispute between D. Babu and Smt. S. Noorjahan Begum.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The crux of the judgment lay in addressing the adequacy and legality of maintenance awarded under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, considering the financial capabilities of the parties and the welfare of the minor child involved.

Facts and Issues: The case revolved around the marriage of D. Babu and Smt. S. Noorjahan Begum, marred by allegations of dowry harassment, domestic violence, and financial neglect. The wife and son, being unable to maintain themselves, filed for maintenance, which was initially granted by the Family Court. D. Babu contested the order, seeking its dismissal, while Smt. Begum sought an enhancement of the maintenance amount.

Evidence and Burden of Proof: The court meticulously examined various evidences, including salary certificates, property documents, and oral testimonies. The evidence underscored the respondent's financial status and the petitioners' claims of domestic abuse and neglect.

Maintenance Assessment: Justice Babu noted, "The learned Judge, Family Court, duly considered the income of the respondent to a tune of around Rs.25,000/- and awarded monthly maintenance of Rs.5,000/- each to the petitioners."

Subsequent Developments: Addressing the respondent's dismissal from service, the court observed that it does not retrospectively affect the maintenance order, as the dismissal occurred after the Family Court's decision.

Decision: The High Court dismissed both revision petitions, upholding the Family Court's maintenance order. Justice Babu concluded, "Considering the income of the respondent and the needs of the petitioners, the maintenance awarded is just and reasonable. There are no substantial grounds to enhance or set aside the said order."

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Babu vs. Smt. S. Noorjahan Begum & Others

 

Similar News