Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance POCSO Presumption Is Not a Dead Letter, But ‘Sterling Witness’ Test Still Governs Conviction: Bombay High Court High Courts Cannot Routinely Entertain Contempt Petitions Beyond One Year: Madras High Court Declines Contempt Plea Filed After Four Years Courts Cannot Reject Suit by Weighing Evidence at Threshold: Delhi High Court Restores Discrimination Suit by Indian Staff Against Italian Embassy Improvised Testimonies and Dubious Recovery Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Sale with Repurchase Condition is Not a Mortgage: Bombay High Court Reverses Redemption Decree After 27-Year Delay Second Transfer Application on Same Grounds is Not Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Legal Position under Section 24 CPC Custodial Interrogation Is Not Punitive — Arrest Cannot Be Used as a Tool to Humiliate in Corporate Offence Allegations: Delhi High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail Partnership Act | Eviction Suit by Unregistered Firm Maintainable if Based on Statutory Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Reasonable Grounds Under Section 37 of NDPS Act Cannot Be Equated with Proof; They Must Reflect More Than Suspicion, But Less Than Conviction: J&K HC Apprehension to Life Is a Just Ground for Transfer When Roots Lie in History of Ideological Violence: Bombay High Court Transfers Defamation Suits Against Hamid Dabholkar, Nikhil Wagle From Goa to Maharashtra

Neglect to Maintain Justifies Separate Residence - High Court Upholds Maintenance Award in Domestic Violence Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, presided over by Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu, affirmed the maintenance order passed by the Family Court in Anantapur, in a case involving allegations of dowry harassment and domestic violence. The court's decision came in the wake of Criminal Revision Cases No. 1477 of 2015 and 1562 of 2015, concerning a marital dispute between D. Babu and Smt. S. Noorjahan Begum.

Legal Point of the Judgment: The crux of the judgment lay in addressing the adequacy and legality of maintenance awarded under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, considering the financial capabilities of the parties and the welfare of the minor child involved.

Facts and Issues: The case revolved around the marriage of D. Babu and Smt. S. Noorjahan Begum, marred by allegations of dowry harassment, domestic violence, and financial neglect. The wife and son, being unable to maintain themselves, filed for maintenance, which was initially granted by the Family Court. D. Babu contested the order, seeking its dismissal, while Smt. Begum sought an enhancement of the maintenance amount.

Evidence and Burden of Proof: The court meticulously examined various evidences, including salary certificates, property documents, and oral testimonies. The evidence underscored the respondent's financial status and the petitioners' claims of domestic abuse and neglect.

Maintenance Assessment: Justice Babu noted, "The learned Judge, Family Court, duly considered the income of the respondent to a tune of around Rs.25,000/- and awarded monthly maintenance of Rs.5,000/- each to the petitioners."

Subsequent Developments: Addressing the respondent's dismissal from service, the court observed that it does not retrospectively affect the maintenance order, as the dismissal occurred after the Family Court's decision.

Decision: The High Court dismissed both revision petitions, upholding the Family Court's maintenance order. Justice Babu concluded, "Considering the income of the respondent and the needs of the petitioners, the maintenance awarded is just and reasonable. There are no substantial grounds to enhance or set aside the said order."

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Babu vs. Smt. S. Noorjahan Begum & Others

 

Latest Legal News