Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Collector’s Appointment of Ex-Serviceman as Lambardar: Preference for Service to the State Valid Tax to Be Computed at 100% Under DTVSV Act, Rejects Inclusion of Belated Grounds in Disputed Tax: Bombay High Court Petitioner’s Father Did Not Fall Within Definition of Enemy – Kerala High Court Quashes Land Classification Under Enemy Property Act Calcutta High Court Upholds Cancellation of LPG Distributor LOI for Violating Guidelines Recording 'Reasons to Believe' is a Mandatory Safeguard, Not a Mere Formality Under PMLA: P&H High Court Illegality Is Incurable, Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Regularized: Bombay High Court Kerala High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Order Granting Retrospective UGC Benefits to Librarians Without Required Qualifications Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | No Evidence Can Be Admitted Beyond Pleadings, And Additional Evidence Cannot Be Allowed Merely To Fill Lacunae: Jharkhand High Court Quashing | Mere Heated Exchanges Over Loan Repayment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Prisoner Transfers Must Prioritize Security and Prevent Gang Violence: Supreme Court Restores Intra-State Transfer Order Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC Is Conditional Upon Framing Substantial Questions of Law: Supreme Court Panchayat Election | Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Bar on Judicial Review During Election Process Encroachment Allegation Requires Concrete Evidence, Not Mere Surmises: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea for Disqualification of Sarpanch Order Denying Permission for Peaceful Protest Rally Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Prolonged Custody Alone Cannot Justify Bail In Cases Involving Heinous Crimes: Delhi High Court Body Shaming and Sexually Colored Remarks Are Unacceptable In A Civilized Society: Kerala High Court No Mandatory Injunction Where Failure to Prove Ownership and Possession: Punjab and Haryana High Court Supreme Court Dismisses Article 32 Petition Seeking Declaration of Bombay High Court Judgment as Illegal Specific Relief Act | Power to Extend Time Under Section 28 Is Discretionary and Must Be Exercised Prudently: Supreme Court

Need For Revisiting And Reevaluating The Sentencing Policy Under Section 304A Delhi High Court

05 September 2024 5:57 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment, the Delhi High Court has taken a significant step towards addressing the issue of road safety by advocating for stricter penalties in road accident cases. The court’s observation in the case of Mohd Nasim vs. The State has paved the way for reevaluating sentencing policies concerning accidents on Delhi’s busy roads.

The judgment, handed down by the Delhi High Court, underscored the inadequacy of existing legal provisions to address the gravity of road accidents. The case in question involved a fatal road accident from 2009, and the court’s stance has far-reaching implications for road safety in the capital city.

“The need for revisiting and reevaluating the sentencing policy under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) cannot be overstated,” emphasized the Delhi High Court in its ruling. The court expressed deep concern about the current state of road safety and stressed the importance of imposing stricter penalties to deter reckless driving.

The judgment highlighted the prevailing casual attitude among drivers, particularly those behind the wheel of commercial vehicles, which often leads to tragic accidents. The court’s observation resonated with the urgency of addressing road safety and promoting responsible driving.

“A professional driver must be constantly vigilant and aware that a single moment of inattention can have devastating consequences,” noted the court in its ruling.

While delivering the judgment, the Delhi High Court took into account the case of Mohd Nasim, who was convicted for causing death by rash and negligent driving. The court acknowledged the petitioner’s legal history and the severity of the incident but emphasized the need for stricter penalties to serve as a deterrent for future accidents.

This landmark decision by the Delhi High Court calls for a critical reexamination of the legal framework concerning road safety in Delhi and, by extension, across the country. It serves as a reminder of the pressing need to align penalties with the gravity of road accidents and ensure a safer environment for all road users in the national capital.

Date of Decision: 03 November 2023

MOHD NASIM VS  THE STATE     

Similar News