Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Multiple Cases Not A Ground for Bail Denial: Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Extortion and Snatching Case”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court today granted regular bail to Jagsir Singh, also known as Jagga, in a case involving allegations of snatching, extortion, and possession of illegal arms. Justice Pankaj Jain presided over the case numbered CRM-M-56958-2023, emphasizing the court’s stance that “involvement in several more cases cannot be a ground to deny bail.”

Jagsir Singh was arrested in connection with FIR No. 101 dated August 21, 2023, which was filed at the Police Station Nihal Singh Wala, District Moga. The FIR included charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, such as Sections 379-B, 420, 383, 411, 120-B, and the Arms Act Sections 25 and 27.

The court’s decision to grant bail was heavily influenced by the principle of parity, as a co-accused in the case, Sikander Singh alias Sikanderi, had previously been granted bail under similar circumstances. The judgment referenced the case ‘Prabhakar Tewari vs. State of UP and another’, 2020 (1) RCR (Criminal) 831, and ‘Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi vs. State of UP (SC)’, (2012) 2 SCC 382, underscoring the notion that an individual’s involvement in multiple cases should not automatically lead to bail denial.

The counsel for the petitioner argued that the accusations against Jagsir Singh were dubious, as the victims had delayed their statements for over a month. Moreover, with the investigation concluded and the challan presented, the petitioner’s continued custody was contested.

The State opposed the bail plea, citing the petitioner’s history of involvement in other criminal cases, including three cases under Section 384 IPC and one under Section 307 IPC. However, the court found this argument insufficient to withhold bail.

Justice Pankaj Jain, while granting bail, stipulated that Jagsir Singh must fulfill the bail and surety bond conditions to the satisfaction of the Trial Court or Duty Magistrate concerned. The judge also made it clear that the observations made in the ruling should not be seen as a comment on the merits of the case.

Date of Decision: 20th November 2023

JAGSIR SINGH @ JAGGA VS STATE OF PUNJAB

Latest Legal News