Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

"Motor Accident Claims: High Court Revises Compensation, Cites 'Discretion of the Court' in Personal Expense Deduction"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 August 17, 2023 - In a landmark decision, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has granted a total compensation of Rs. 8,44,508 to Daya alias Dayawanti, the widow of Sarwan Kumar who died in a motor vehicular accident. The Court observed, "it is the discretion of the court to decide the deduction for personal expenses," and decided that a deduction of 1/3rd for personal expenses would be just and fair in this case.

Daya alias Dayawanti had filed an appeal for the modification of the award dated 28.02.2007, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT). She sought an enhancement of the amount of compensation initially awarded by the Tribunal, which was Rs. 3,79,000. The accident had occurred on January 10, 2005, when a canter collided with Sarwan Kumar's truck, leading to his immediate death.

The key issues addressed by the Court included the determination of the monthly salary of the deceased, enhancement of the income on account of future prospects, the deduction of personal expenses, and compensation on account of loss of estate.

Justice Sanjay Vashisth stated, "The income of the deceased should have been assessed according to the DC rates prevalent at the time of the accident, which were Rs. 5,812.75/- per month." The Court also emphasized that in cases where there is only one dependent, the deduction for personal expenses is at the discretion of the court.

The Court partly modified the award of the Tribunal and granted a total compensation of Rs. 8,44,508 to the appellant, along with an interest rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition. The appeal was allowed with the terms indicated in the judgement.

The judgement cited several key cases, including Smt. Sarla Verma and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and another, Sangtari Muleem v. Karnail Singh, National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Ors., and Smt. Anjali and others v. Lokendra Rathod and others.

This decision is seen as a significant step in ensuring fair compensation for victims or their families in motor accident cases.

D.D- August 17, 2023

Daya @ Dayawanti vs Arjun and others

 

Latest Legal News