Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Delays in processing applications for premature release cannot deprive convicts of interim relief: Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole Listing All Appeals Arising From A Common Judgment Before The Same Bench Avoids Contradictory Rulings: Full Bench of the Patna High Court. Age Claims in Borderline Cases Demand Scrutiny: Madhya Pradesh HC on Juvenile Justice Act Bishop Garden Not Available for Partition Due to Legal Quietus on Declaration Suit: Madras High Court Exclusion of Certain Heirs Alone Does Not Make a Will Suspicious: Kerala High Court Upholds Validity of Will Proof of Delivery Was Never Requested, Nor Was it a Payment Precondition: Delhi High Court Held Courier Firm Entitled to Payment Despite Non-Delivery Allegations Widowed Daughter Eligible for Compassionate Appointment under BSNL Scheme: Allahabad High Court Brutality of an Offence Does Not Dispense With Legal Proof: Supreme Court Overturns Life Imprisonment of Two Accused Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son

Mere Possession of Counterfeit Currency Insufficient Without Proving Mens Rea: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court upholds trial court’s decision, emphasizing the necessity of proving knowledge and intent in counterfeit currency offenses.

The Gujarat High Court has upheld the acquittal of Himatlal Bhailal Rajgor and others in a case involving the possession and trafficking of counterfeit currency notes, as well as impersonation of police officers. The bench, comprising Justices Nirzar S. Desai and Hasmukh D. Suthar, emphasized the prosecution’s failure to prove mens rea (criminal intent) and conscious possession of the counterfeit notes, which are critical elements for conviction under the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

On June 8, 1992, intelligence received by PSI R.G. Rathod of Kutch-Bhuj led to raids on the residences of the accused, resulting in the recovery of counterfeit US dollars. The accused were charged under Sections 489(A), 489(B), 489(C), 489(D), 34, 171 read with Section 114 of the IPC for possessing and trafficking counterfeit currency and impersonating police officers. The trial court acquitted the accused in 1998, a decision now upheld by the High Court.

Credibility of Evidence: The High Court scrutinized the evidence presented by the prosecution, noting significant shortcomings. “The prosecution failed to prove that the accused had knowledge or reason to believe that the currency notes were counterfeit,” the court remarked. The defense argued that the investigation lacked impartiality, with critical witnesses turning hostile and the evidence being insufficient to establish the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.

Mens Rea and Conscious Possession: The bench reiterated the necessity of proving mens rea in offenses involving counterfeit currency. “Mere possession of counterfeit currency is not sufficient for conviction under Sections 489(B) and 489(C) IPC without proving mens rea,” the court stated. The prosecution could not establish that the accused knowingly possessed or trafficked counterfeit notes. Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar emphasized, “The prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused had knowledge or reason to believe that the notes were counterfeit.”

Impersonation of Police Officers: Addressing the charges of impersonation under Section 171 IPC, the court found no evidence to substantiate the claim. “Merely finding khaki dresses was insufficient to prove the offense of impersonation,” the judgment noted, highlighting the lack of any concrete evidence that the accused pretended to be police officers.

The court’s judgment underscored the principles of evaluating evidence in criminal cases. Referring to established precedents, the bench highlighted that the presumption of innocence must be maintained unless the prosecution can prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The court cited several cases, including Sheo Swarup v. King Emperor and Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel v. State of Gujarat, emphasizing the importance of a thorough and impartial investigation.

Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar remarked, “In the absence of any evidence proving the mens rea and conscious possession of counterfeit currency, the prosecution’s case falls short. The presumption of innocence stands strong, and the benefit of doubt must go to the accused.”

The Gujarat High Court’s decision to uphold the acquittal in this counterfeit currency case highlights the judiciary’s adherence to the principles of criminal justice, particularly the necessity of proving mens rea and conscious possession. This judgment reinforces the legal standards required for conviction in cases involving counterfeit currency and impersonation. By affirming the trial court’s decision, the High Court sends a clear message about the rigorous proof needed to establish guilt in such serious offenses.

Date of Decision: 21st May 2024

State of Gujarat v. Himatlal Bhailal Rajgor & Ors.

Similar News