UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Mere Ability to Arrest Does Not Justify the Act of Arrest Without Proper Legal Basis – Bombay High Court Grants Bail To Chanda Kochhar

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Bombay High Court in a significant ruling concerning the arrest of Chanda Deepak Kochhar and Deepak Virendra Kochhar has emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural safeguards under the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). The bench comprising Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Prithviraj K. Chavan highlighted the non-compliance with Sections 41, 41-A, and 60-A of Cr.P.C. in the arrest of the Kochhars, leading to the conclusion that their arrests were not in accordance with the law.

The case revolved around the arrest and detention of Chanda Kochhar and her husband Deepak Kochhar by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The petitioners challenged the legality of the FIR, their arrest, and remand, alleging violations of Cr.P.C. provisions and constitutional mandates. They sought the quashing of the FIR and their release from custody.

The High Court meticulously analyzed the procedure followed in the arrest of the Kochhars. The Court found a significant deviation from the compliance requirements of Sections 41, 41-A, and 60-A of Cr.P.C. The reasons stated in the arrest memos did not satisfy the necessary conditions under these sections, leading the Court to conclude that the arrests were not lawfully executed.

The Court underscored the protection of individual liberty against arbitrary arrest, stating, “The mere ability to arrest does not justify the act of arrest without proper legal basis and adherence to procedural safeguards.” This observation reflects the Court’s reinforcement of the right to personal liberty and its protection from arbitrary arrest.

In light of the non-compliance with mandatory Cr.P.C. provisions and Supreme Court directions, the Court held that the petitioners’ arrests were illegal. The Court ordered the release of the petitioners on interim bail, imposing specific conditions for their release.

Date of Decision: 9-jan-2024

Chanda Deepak Kochhar vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Latest Legal News