Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Mere Ability to Arrest Does Not Justify the Act of Arrest Without Proper Legal Basis – Bombay High Court Grants Bail To Chanda Kochhar

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Bombay High Court in a significant ruling concerning the arrest of Chanda Deepak Kochhar and Deepak Virendra Kochhar has emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural safeguards under the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). The bench comprising Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Prithviraj K. Chavan highlighted the non-compliance with Sections 41, 41-A, and 60-A of Cr.P.C. in the arrest of the Kochhars, leading to the conclusion that their arrests were not in accordance with the law.

The case revolved around the arrest and detention of Chanda Kochhar and her husband Deepak Kochhar by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The petitioners challenged the legality of the FIR, their arrest, and remand, alleging violations of Cr.P.C. provisions and constitutional mandates. They sought the quashing of the FIR and their release from custody.

The High Court meticulously analyzed the procedure followed in the arrest of the Kochhars. The Court found a significant deviation from the compliance requirements of Sections 41, 41-A, and 60-A of Cr.P.C. The reasons stated in the arrest memos did not satisfy the necessary conditions under these sections, leading the Court to conclude that the arrests were not lawfully executed.

The Court underscored the protection of individual liberty against arbitrary arrest, stating, “The mere ability to arrest does not justify the act of arrest without proper legal basis and adherence to procedural safeguards.” This observation reflects the Court’s reinforcement of the right to personal liberty and its protection from arbitrary arrest.

In light of the non-compliance with mandatory Cr.P.C. provisions and Supreme Court directions, the Court held that the petitioners’ arrests were illegal. The Court ordered the release of the petitioners on interim bail, imposing specific conditions for their release.

Date of Decision: 9-jan-2024

Chanda Deepak Kochhar vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Latest Legal News