CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Mental agony suffered by the husband due to the unreasonable behavior of his wife – Divorce Granted – PH HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted a divorce decree to a husband, citing cruelty and the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. The judgment, delivered by Justice Ritu Bahri and Justice Manisha Batra, emphasized the mental agony suffered by the husband due to the unreasonable behavior of his wife.

The case, Harjeet Kaur v. Satpal Singh, revolved around the appellant-wife's refusal to live in a joint family and her persistent demands for separate residence. The wife also made false criminal complaints against her husband and his family, leading to their arrest. The court observed that these actions caused immense mental cruelty to the husband and affected the reputation of the entire family.

The bench stated, "The appellant-wife's unreasonable demands, refusal to live in a joint family, and filing of false criminal complaints against her husband and his family members established mental cruelty. The marriage has irretrievably broken down, and there is no possibility of the parties living together."

The court further noted that despite attempts at mediation and reconciliation, the differences between the parties remained irreconcilable. The wife's actions had created an environment of hostility and made it impossible for the couple to continue their marital relationship.

The judgment relied on precedents and legal principles to support the decision. It referred to the case of Naveen Kohli v. Neetu Kohli, where the Supreme Court held that a marriage irretrievably broken down due to one party's cruel treatment could be dissolved. The court also cited the importance of considering the interests of the child and the pragmatic reality of the situation.

The High Court's decision highlights the significance of mental cruelty as a valid ground for divorce and emphasizes the need for courts to address the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage. The ruling recognizes that preserving a marriage that has ceased to be effective would only result in further misery for the parties involved.

This judgment serves as an important precedent and reaffirms the court's commitment to protecting individuals from enduring a marriage that has become untenable due to mental cruelty and irreparable differences.

Date of Decision: 05.01.2023

 

 Harjeet Kaur VS Satpal Singh

Latest Legal News