Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Men May Tell Lies, Circumstances Do Not – Orissa High Court Acquits in Dowry Death Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement that brings into sharp focus the complexities of dowry-related cases, the Orissa High Court has set aside the conviction under Section 304-B (Dowry Death) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against Bhanu Charan Pradhan, citing a lack of evidence linking the death of his wife to dowry demands. The Court, however, upheld the conviction under Section 498-A (Cruelty) of the IPC.

Justice S.K. Sahoo, presiding over the case, emphasized the necessity of meticulous evidence analysis, stating, “Men may tell lies, but circumstances do not.” This observation highlighted the Court’s approach to the circumstantial and documentary evidence presented.

The case, which dates back to 1997, involved the death of Minoti Pradhan, the wife of the appellant, under abnormal circumstances within seven years of marriage. The prosecution had alleged that her death was a result of cruelty and harassment related to dowry demands, a claim that was eventually not upheld due to insufficient evidence.

The Court’s analysis delved deeply into the contents of various letters and testimonies, underscoring the significance of understanding the nuances in such sensitive cases. Justice Sahoo remarked on the nature of the evidence, noting that it did not conclusively prove any dowry-related harassment.

In a significant observation, the judgment drew attention to the definition of dowry and the interpretation of demands made within a marriage. Citing previous Supreme Court judgments, Justice Sahoo clarified the distinctions between dowry demands and other financial negotiations within the marital context.

Mohammed Faradish, advocate for the appellant, and Mr. Priyabrata Tripathy, Additional Standing Counsel for the respondent, were acknowledged for their contributions to the case. The Court’s decision has sparked discussions among legal circles regarding the interpretation of dowry laws and the evidentiary standards required for convictions in such cases.

This judgement is seen as a crucial addition to the ongoing discourse on dowry-related crimes and the legal framework surrounding them in India.

Date of Decision: 02 November 2023

Bhanu Charan Pradhan VS State of Odisha     

Latest Legal News