Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Medical Negligence Allegations Dismissed: Res Ipsa Loquitor Not Applicable: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 17 Oct. 2023, the Supreme Court of India dismissed allegations of medical negligence against a hospital and its doctors, stating that the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" (the thing speaks for itself) were not applicable in this case. The bench, comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and Prashant Kumar Mishra, held that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims of negligence.

The case revolved around a patient who underwent neurosurgery at the hospital and tragically suffered a cardiac arrest and subsequent demise. The deceased patient's wife had filed a complaint alleging that medical negligence had led to her husband's death. The core of the allegations pertained to the lack of post-operative care and a delay in shifting the patient to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

The hospital and doctors, however, contended that post-operative care had been provided in accordance with standard procedures. They argued that the symptoms exhibited by the patient did not suggest a cardiac arrest, and an affidavit from a neurosurgery professor supported the view that the complications were unrelated to the surgery. Importantly, there was no medical history of diabetes, hypertension, or cardiac problems in the patient.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, carefully evaluated the evidence presented and concluded that the appellant had not established negligence in post-operative care. In their decision, the bench emphasized that the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" did not apply in this case. This legal doctrine presumes negligence when an injury occurs that would not have happened in the absence of negligence. However, the court found that the appellant failed to provide sufficient proof to trigger this doctrine.

The judgment underscores the importance of presenting compelling evidence in cases of alleged medical negligence and highlights the court's role in impartially assessing such claims. This decision serves as a reminder that the burden of proof rests with the party alleging negligence, and the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" cannot be invoked without sufficient supporting evidence.

The Supreme Court's ruling brings clarity to the legal standards surrounding medical negligence cases and underscores the significance of evidence-based claims in such matters.

Date of Decision: October 17, 2023

MRS. KALYANI RAJAN  vs INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITAL  & ORS.            

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/17-Oct-2023_Kalyani_Rajan-Vs-Indraprastha_Apollo_Hospital.pdf"]

Similar News