Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Medical Negligence Allegations Dismissed: Res Ipsa Loquitor Not Applicable: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 17 Oct. 2023, the Supreme Court of India dismissed allegations of medical negligence against a hospital and its doctors, stating that the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" (the thing speaks for itself) were not applicable in this case. The bench, comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and Prashant Kumar Mishra, held that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims of negligence.

The case revolved around a patient who underwent neurosurgery at the hospital and tragically suffered a cardiac arrest and subsequent demise. The deceased patient's wife had filed a complaint alleging that medical negligence had led to her husband's death. The core of the allegations pertained to the lack of post-operative care and a delay in shifting the patient to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

The hospital and doctors, however, contended that post-operative care had been provided in accordance with standard procedures. They argued that the symptoms exhibited by the patient did not suggest a cardiac arrest, and an affidavit from a neurosurgery professor supported the view that the complications were unrelated to the surgery. Importantly, there was no medical history of diabetes, hypertension, or cardiac problems in the patient.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, carefully evaluated the evidence presented and concluded that the appellant had not established negligence in post-operative care. In their decision, the bench emphasized that the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" did not apply in this case. This legal doctrine presumes negligence when an injury occurs that would not have happened in the absence of negligence. However, the court found that the appellant failed to provide sufficient proof to trigger this doctrine.

The judgment underscores the importance of presenting compelling evidence in cases of alleged medical negligence and highlights the court's role in impartially assessing such claims. This decision serves as a reminder that the burden of proof rests with the party alleging negligence, and the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" cannot be invoked without sufficient supporting evidence.

The Supreme Court's ruling brings clarity to the legal standards surrounding medical negligence cases and underscores the significance of evidence-based claims in such matters.

Date of Decision: October 17, 2023

MRS. KALYANI RAJAN  vs INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITAL  & ORS.            

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/17-Oct-2023_Kalyani_Rajan-Vs-Indraprastha_Apollo_Hospital.pdf"]

Latest Legal News