Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Medical Negligence Allegations Dismissed: Res Ipsa Loquitor Not Applicable: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 17 Oct. 2023, the Supreme Court of India dismissed allegations of medical negligence against a hospital and its doctors, stating that the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" (the thing speaks for itself) were not applicable in this case. The bench, comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and Prashant Kumar Mishra, held that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims of negligence.

The case revolved around a patient who underwent neurosurgery at the hospital and tragically suffered a cardiac arrest and subsequent demise. The deceased patient's wife had filed a complaint alleging that medical negligence had led to her husband's death. The core of the allegations pertained to the lack of post-operative care and a delay in shifting the patient to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

The hospital and doctors, however, contended that post-operative care had been provided in accordance with standard procedures. They argued that the symptoms exhibited by the patient did not suggest a cardiac arrest, and an affidavit from a neurosurgery professor supported the view that the complications were unrelated to the surgery. Importantly, there was no medical history of diabetes, hypertension, or cardiac problems in the patient.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, carefully evaluated the evidence presented and concluded that the appellant had not established negligence in post-operative care. In their decision, the bench emphasized that the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" did not apply in this case. This legal doctrine presumes negligence when an injury occurs that would not have happened in the absence of negligence. However, the court found that the appellant failed to provide sufficient proof to trigger this doctrine.

The judgment underscores the importance of presenting compelling evidence in cases of alleged medical negligence and highlights the court's role in impartially assessing such claims. This decision serves as a reminder that the burden of proof rests with the party alleging negligence, and the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" cannot be invoked without sufficient supporting evidence.

The Supreme Court's ruling brings clarity to the legal standards surrounding medical negligence cases and underscores the significance of evidence-based claims in such matters.

Date of Decision: October 17, 2023

MRS. KALYANI RAJAN  vs INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITAL  & ORS.            

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/17-Oct-2023_Kalyani_Rajan-Vs-Indraprastha_Apollo_Hospital.pdf"]

Similar News