Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Medical Negligence Allegations Dismissed: Res Ipsa Loquitor Not Applicable: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 17 Oct. 2023, the Supreme Court of India dismissed allegations of medical negligence against a hospital and its doctors, stating that the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" (the thing speaks for itself) were not applicable in this case. The bench, comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and Prashant Kumar Mishra, held that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims of negligence.

The case revolved around a patient who underwent neurosurgery at the hospital and tragically suffered a cardiac arrest and subsequent demise. The deceased patient's wife had filed a complaint alleging that medical negligence had led to her husband's death. The core of the allegations pertained to the lack of post-operative care and a delay in shifting the patient to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

The hospital and doctors, however, contended that post-operative care had been provided in accordance with standard procedures. They argued that the symptoms exhibited by the patient did not suggest a cardiac arrest, and an affidavit from a neurosurgery professor supported the view that the complications were unrelated to the surgery. Importantly, there was no medical history of diabetes, hypertension, or cardiac problems in the patient.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, carefully evaluated the evidence presented and concluded that the appellant had not established negligence in post-operative care. In their decision, the bench emphasized that the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" did not apply in this case. This legal doctrine presumes negligence when an injury occurs that would not have happened in the absence of negligence. However, the court found that the appellant failed to provide sufficient proof to trigger this doctrine.

The judgment underscores the importance of presenting compelling evidence in cases of alleged medical negligence and highlights the court's role in impartially assessing such claims. This decision serves as a reminder that the burden of proof rests with the party alleging negligence, and the principles of "Res Ipsa Loquitor" cannot be invoked without sufficient supporting evidence.

The Supreme Court's ruling brings clarity to the legal standards surrounding medical negligence cases and underscores the significance of evidence-based claims in such matters.

Date of Decision: October 17, 2023

MRS. KALYANI RAJAN  vs INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITAL  & ORS.            

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/17-Oct-2023_Kalyani_Rajan-Vs-Indraprastha_Apollo_Hospital.pdf"]

Latest Legal News