Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case Matrimonial Acrimony a Strong Motive for False Implication: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses State's Appeal in POCSO Acquittal Conviction Cannot Rest on Presumptions and Hearsay: Rajasthan High Court Acquits Man Accused of Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Revenge Theory A Decree Based on No Pre-existing Right and Procured Through an Impostor is Void and Unenforceable: P&H HC No Insurance Cover, No 'Pay and Recover': Madras High Court Exonerates Insurer from Liability Due to Bounced Premium Cheque Licence That Is Void Ab Initio Cannot Be Protected by Due Process: Calcutta High Court Upholds Licensing Authority’s Inherent Power to Revoke Fair Price Shop Licence Unless Fraudulent Misrepresentation Is Shown, Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked Against Alleged Unauthorized Constructions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Pleas Seeking Demolition Delay in Lodging FIR is Fatal Where Police Reached the Crime Scene Same Night: Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused After 38 Years Granting Pre-Arrest Protection While Refusing to Quash FIR is a Contradiction in Terms: Supreme Court Marriage Ceased to Have Any Substance: Supreme Court Affirms Divorce on Grounds of Irretrievable Breakdown, Enhances Alimony to ₹50 Lakhs Once A Person Dead, Their Section 161 CrPC Statement Relating To Cause Of Death Assumes Character Of Dying Declaration: Supreme Court Nomination Ends When Family Begins: Supreme Court Declares GPF Nomination Invalid After Marriage, Orders Equal Share for Wife and Mother Arbitration Act | Party Autonomy Prevails Over Arbitral Discretion on Interest: Supreme Court Binds Parties To Agreed Interest Rates, Even At 36% Exemption Depends on Use, Not the User: Supreme Court Clarifies GST Relief for Residential Rentals to Companies Sub-Leasing as Hostels Statutory Proof Cannot Be Second-Guessed: Supreme Court Strikes Down Jharkhand Memo Requiring Extra Verification for Stamp Duty Exemption to Cooperative Societies Arbitral Tribunal Is Not Above the Contract: Supreme Court Refers Bharat Drilling Judgment to Larger Bench on Excepted Clauses

Marriage Totally Unworkable, Emotionally Dead and Beyond Salvation – Supreme Court Grants Divorce Under Article 142

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court today dissolved the marriage of Jatinder Kumar Sapra and Anupama Sapra, which had been under strife for over two decades, citing irretrievable breakdown as the ground for dissolution.

Legal Context: The apex court utilized its discretion under Article 142(1) of the Constitution of India to grant the divorce despite the specific grounds under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 not being fully substantiated with evidence. This discretionary power is exercised to ensure “complete justice” when conventional remedies are inadequate.

Facts of the Case: Jatinder Kumar Sapra and Anupama Sapra, married on October 14, 1991, found their marriage mired in bitterness, mutual accusations of cruelty, and a prolonged separation since January 2002. Both the Family Court and the High Court had previously denied the divorce petition citing insufficient grounds under the existing marital laws.

Irretrievable Breakdown: The Court, led by Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, noted that the marriage was “totally unworkable, emotionally dead, and beyond salvation,” conditions that necessitated a divorce to prevent further legal and emotional turmoil.

Attempts at Reconciliation: The court acknowledged several failed attempts at mediation and reconciliation over the years, affirming that no further efforts could salvage the marital relationship.

Economic and Social Considerations: The justices considered the stable financial status of the appellant, who had a significant career in multinational corporations, and the adulthood and independence of their children, which lessened familial dependencies.

Permanent Alimony: An alimony of Rs. 50,00,000 was set, reflecting the appellant’s financial capacity and aiming to secure the respondent’s future.

Decision: The court decreed the dissolution of marriage based on its findings of an irretrievable breakdown, directing the appellant to pay alimony in five installments from May to September 2024. The divorce decree will be issued once the full alimony payment is confirmed.

Date of Decision: May 6, 2024

Jatinder Kumar Sapra vs. Anupama Sapra

Latest Legal News