Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court

Marriage Null and Void Due to Sapinda Relationship: Upholds Rights of Children Born in Such Unions: Delhi High Court

05 September 2024 5:36 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on October 9, 2023, the Delhi High Court declared a marriage null and void due to a sapinda relationship under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The ruling also upheld the rights of children born in such unions.

The judgment, delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, centered around a case filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995. The petitioner sought the setting aside or quashing of a previous judgment and decree of nullity, which declared the marriage between the parties as void.

The key observation made by the court was regarding the existence of a custom or usage permitting marriages within the sapinda relationship. The court examined the evidence presented in this regard and concluded that the petitioner had failed to establish such a custom or usage. As a result, the marriage within the sapinda relationship was held to be null and void.

The judgment also addressed the rights of children born out of null and void marriages. It cited Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act, which confers legitimacy on such children. The court emphasized that these children have rights in the property of their parents, whether it is self-acquired or ancestral. It was clarified that there are no restrictions on the property rights of such children.

The court's ruling is significant as it reaffirms the legal stance on marriages within the sapinda relationship and their consequences. It also underscores the importance of recognizing the rights of children born in such unions.

The advocates representing the parties in this case were Mr. Prerna Arora, Ms. Devika Gupta, and Ms. Mallika Saxena for the petitioner and Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, Mr. Shubham Seth, and Mr. Anuj Panwar for the respondent.

This judgment serves as a precedent in matters related to sapinda relationships and the legal rights of children born in marriages that are declared null and void under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Date of Decision: 09 October 2023

NEETU GROVER  vs GAGAN GROVER

Latest Legal News