Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Marriage Null and Void Due to Sapinda Relationship: Upholds Rights of Children Born in Such Unions: Delhi High Court

05 September 2024 5:36 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on October 9, 2023, the Delhi High Court declared a marriage null and void due to a sapinda relationship under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The ruling also upheld the rights of children born in such unions.

The judgment, delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, centered around a case filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995. The petitioner sought the setting aside or quashing of a previous judgment and decree of nullity, which declared the marriage between the parties as void.

The key observation made by the court was regarding the existence of a custom or usage permitting marriages within the sapinda relationship. The court examined the evidence presented in this regard and concluded that the petitioner had failed to establish such a custom or usage. As a result, the marriage within the sapinda relationship was held to be null and void.

The judgment also addressed the rights of children born out of null and void marriages. It cited Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act, which confers legitimacy on such children. The court emphasized that these children have rights in the property of their parents, whether it is self-acquired or ancestral. It was clarified that there are no restrictions on the property rights of such children.

The court's ruling is significant as it reaffirms the legal stance on marriages within the sapinda relationship and their consequences. It also underscores the importance of recognizing the rights of children born in such unions.

The advocates representing the parties in this case were Mr. Prerna Arora, Ms. Devika Gupta, and Ms. Mallika Saxena for the petitioner and Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, Mr. Shubham Seth, and Mr. Anuj Panwar for the respondent.

This judgment serves as a precedent in matters related to sapinda relationships and the legal rights of children born in marriages that are declared null and void under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Date of Decision: 09 October 2023

NEETU GROVER  vs GAGAN GROVER

Latest Legal News