Senior Officers Must Be Held Criminally Accountable For Subordinates' Failures: Allahabad HC Recommends 'Superior Responsibility' Doctrine To DoPT Independent Evidence Justifies Compensation Enhancement Even If Relied-Upon Precedents Are Set Aside: Karnataka High Court Right To Travel Abroad Not Absolute; Must Be Balanced With Right To Speedy Trial & Societal Interest: Supreme Court Constitutional Courts Cannot Remain Mute Spectators To Inordinate Delays In Investigation: Supreme Court EPF Accumulations Are Protected Retiral Benefits, Cannot Be Defeated By Financial Incapacity Of State Corporations: Supreme Court Allahabad HC Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide For Man Who Threw Children Into Well, Says Act Was Done Without Premeditated Intent Defendant Who Denied Plaintiff's Title In Written Statement Can't Seek Substitution As Plaintiff's Assignee Upon Their Death: Gauhati High Court Section 307 IPC Conviction Requires Concurrence Of Mens Rea And Actus Reus; Not Sustainable Without Intention To Kill: Delhi High Court Writ Jurisdiction Not A Forum To Rewrite Contracts; High Court Does Not Sit As Site Engineer: Andhra Pradesh HC Adding Additional Charges In Retrial For Subsequent Offences Does Not Amount To Double Jeopardy: Calcutta High Court 80% Consent Requirement For Integrated Township Projects To Be Calculated For Entire Project, Not Village-Wise: Allahabad High Court Police Not Competent To Dispossess Or Evict Persons From Property: AP High Court Driver’s Murder While On Duty Is An ‘Accidental Death’ Under Employees’ Compensation Act If No Personal Motive Exists: Delhi High Court UAPA Can't Be Invoked For Stone-Pelting During Protests; Akhil Gogoi To Face Trial Under IPC For Anti-CAA Agitation: Gauhati High Court Time Is Essence Of Contract If Expressly Provided; Purchaser Failing To Pay Balance Within Stipulated Period Not Entitled To Specific Performance: Karnataka High Court 'Gross Annual Income' Under Section 38 Waqf Act Includes All Sources Before Deductions: Kerala High Court Evidence Based Solely On Co-Accused Statement, No Recovery: Punjab & Haryana HC Grants Bail In UAPA Case Despite Accused's 'Massive' Criminal History Adoption Not Recognised In Islamic Law For Inheritance; Nearer Heirs Exclude Remote Ones Under Principle Of 'Al-Hajb': Madras High Court High Court Grants Transit Anticipatory Bail To Inter-Faith Couple Fearing 'Honour Killing' In Madhya Pradesh; Protects From Arrest For One Month Market Value Escalation Applied During Land Valuation Cannot Be Adjusted Against Statutory Benefits Under Section 23(1A): Punjab & Haryana High Court Bail Cancellation Is A Harsh Step; Cannot Be Granted Merely On Gravity Of Offence Without Evidence Of Post-Bail Misconduct: Rajasthan High Court Uncorroborated Confessions & Failure To Produce Material Exhibits Fatal To Prosecution: Gauhati High Court Acquits Murder Accused Plea Of Alibi Not Conclusive At Summoning Stage; Can Only Be Tested On Basis Of Evidence Produced During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Defendant's Property Need Not Be Specifically Scheduled In Suit For Boundary Fixation If Common Boundary Is Indicated: Kerala High Court Courts Should Not Adopt Hyper-Technical Approach To Mofussil Pleadings; Attestation By Relatives Presumes Knowledge Of Contents: Madras High Court

Marriage Null and Void Due to Sapinda Relationship: Upholds Rights of Children Born in Such Unions: Delhi High Court

05 September 2024 5:36 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on October 9, 2023, the Delhi High Court declared a marriage null and void due to a sapinda relationship under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The ruling also upheld the rights of children born in such unions.

The judgment, delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, centered around a case filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995. The petitioner sought the setting aside or quashing of a previous judgment and decree of nullity, which declared the marriage between the parties as void.

The key observation made by the court was regarding the existence of a custom or usage permitting marriages within the sapinda relationship. The court examined the evidence presented in this regard and concluded that the petitioner had failed to establish such a custom or usage. As a result, the marriage within the sapinda relationship was held to be null and void.

The judgment also addressed the rights of children born out of null and void marriages. It cited Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act, which confers legitimacy on such children. The court emphasized that these children have rights in the property of their parents, whether it is self-acquired or ancestral. It was clarified that there are no restrictions on the property rights of such children.

The court's ruling is significant as it reaffirms the legal stance on marriages within the sapinda relationship and their consequences. It also underscores the importance of recognizing the rights of children born in such unions.

The advocates representing the parties in this case were Mr. Prerna Arora, Ms. Devika Gupta, and Ms. Mallika Saxena for the petitioner and Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, Mr. Shubham Seth, and Mr. Anuj Panwar for the respondent.

This judgment serves as a precedent in matters related to sapinda relationships and the legal rights of children born in marriages that are declared null and void under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Date of Decision: 09 October 2023

NEETU GROVER  vs GAGAN GROVER

Latest Legal News