Unexplained Possession Of Stolen Ornaments Soon After Murder Attracts Presumption Of Guilt Under Section 114 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Identical Pay Scale Cannot Be Basis To Confer Benefits Meant Specifically For Scientists: Gauhati High Court Suit For Partition Not Maintainable Without Seeking Cancellation Of Registered Partition Deed Signed By Plaintiff: Karnataka High Court Law Officers Have No Vested Right To Complete 3-Year Tenure, State Can Terminate Services Early: Orissa High Court Carpenter With Amputated Leg Suffers 100% Functional Disability As Trade Requires Squatting & Sitting Position: Supreme Court Fatal Fall Into Dry Canal During Scuffle Attracts Section 304 Part II IPC: Supreme Court Reduces Sentence To Period Undergone Minor Rape Victim Permitted To Terminate 28-Week Pregnancy: Delhi High Court Cites Right To Bodily Autonomy Under Article 21 Investigation Initiated Without FIR Registration Illegal; Prosecution Documents Prepared After Trap Proceedings 'Table Investigation': Andhra Pradesh High Court Successive Writ Petitions On Same Cause Of Action Barred By Constructive Res Judicata: Bombay High Court Dismisses BPCL's Challenge To Octroi Levy Court Fees Must Be Refunded If Commercial Suit Is Rejected For Non-Compliance With Pre-Institution Mediation: Calcutta High Court Deduction Under Section 80-I Must Be Computed On Profits And Gains Without Reducing Investment Deposit Claim Under Section 32AB: Gujarat High Court Employee’s Right To Appeal Not Lost If Disciplinary Action Initiated By Higher Authority Provided Further Appeal Lies To Superior Body: Kerala High Court Preceding 10-Year Period For Charge Sheets Mandatory To Invoke 'Organized Crime' Under Section 111 BNS: J&K High Court Grants Bail PIL Petitioners Doubted By Court Must Annex Previous Adverse Orders In Future Filings: Kerala High Court Shifting Drug Traffickers To Distant States Necessary To Disrupt Supply Chains: Calcutta High Court Upholds PITNDPS Detention

Marriage Null and Void Due to Sapinda Relationship: Upholds Rights of Children Born in Such Unions: Delhi High Court

05 September 2024 5:36 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on October 9, 2023, the Delhi High Court declared a marriage null and void due to a sapinda relationship under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The ruling also upheld the rights of children born in such unions.

The judgment, delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, centered around a case filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995. The petitioner sought the setting aside or quashing of a previous judgment and decree of nullity, which declared the marriage between the parties as void.

The key observation made by the court was regarding the existence of a custom or usage permitting marriages within the sapinda relationship. The court examined the evidence presented in this regard and concluded that the petitioner had failed to establish such a custom or usage. As a result, the marriage within the sapinda relationship was held to be null and void.

The judgment also addressed the rights of children born out of null and void marriages. It cited Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act, which confers legitimacy on such children. The court emphasized that these children have rights in the property of their parents, whether it is self-acquired or ancestral. It was clarified that there are no restrictions on the property rights of such children.

The court's ruling is significant as it reaffirms the legal stance on marriages within the sapinda relationship and their consequences. It also underscores the importance of recognizing the rights of children born in such unions.

The advocates representing the parties in this case were Mr. Prerna Arora, Ms. Devika Gupta, and Ms. Mallika Saxena for the petitioner and Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, Mr. Shubham Seth, and Mr. Anuj Panwar for the respondent.

This judgment serves as a precedent in matters related to sapinda relationships and the legal rights of children born in marriages that are declared null and void under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Date of Decision: 09 October 2023

NEETU GROVER  vs GAGAN GROVER

Latest Legal News