"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

Marriage Null and Void Due to Sapinda Relationship: Upholds Rights of Children Born in Such Unions: Delhi High Court

05 September 2024 5:36 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on October 9, 2023, the Delhi High Court declared a marriage null and void due to a sapinda relationship under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The ruling also upheld the rights of children born in such unions.

The judgment, delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, centered around a case filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995. The petitioner sought the setting aside or quashing of a previous judgment and decree of nullity, which declared the marriage between the parties as void.

The key observation made by the court was regarding the existence of a custom or usage permitting marriages within the sapinda relationship. The court examined the evidence presented in this regard and concluded that the petitioner had failed to establish such a custom or usage. As a result, the marriage within the sapinda relationship was held to be null and void.

The judgment also addressed the rights of children born out of null and void marriages. It cited Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act, which confers legitimacy on such children. The court emphasized that these children have rights in the property of their parents, whether it is self-acquired or ancestral. It was clarified that there are no restrictions on the property rights of such children.

The court's ruling is significant as it reaffirms the legal stance on marriages within the sapinda relationship and their consequences. It also underscores the importance of recognizing the rights of children born in such unions.

The advocates representing the parties in this case were Mr. Prerna Arora, Ms. Devika Gupta, and Ms. Mallika Saxena for the petitioner and Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, Mr. Shubham Seth, and Mr. Anuj Panwar for the respondent.

This judgment serves as a precedent in matters related to sapinda relationships and the legal rights of children born in marriages that are declared null and void under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Date of Decision: 09 October 2023

NEETU GROVER  vs GAGAN GROVER

Similar News