Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused

Marriage Loses Its Sanctity When Conflicts Take the Form of Disrespect: Delhi HC Grants Divorce in Favor of Celebrity Chef Facing Continuous Marital Cruelty

01 August 2025 9:33 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Delhi, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, has granted divorce to xxx, a celebrity chef, observing that "marriage loses its sanctity when conflicts take the form of disrespect and inconsideration towards their spouse."

The judgment revolves around an appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the dismissal of a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Appellant contended that the behavior of his wife amounted to marital cruelty.

The parties, married in 2008, experienced continual discord marked by allegations of cruelty. The Appellant, a renowned chef, accused his wife, xxx, of physical abuse, humiliation, and baseless allegations affecting his career and public image. The issues primarily concerned whether these actions constituted cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Marital Discord and Cruelty: The court observed that continuous conflicts, disrespect, and the Appellant’s humiliation and public embarrassment due to false allegations by the Respondent constituted marital cruelty.

Impact on Child and Family Life: The aggressive behavior and verbal altercations of the Respondent in the presence of their minor child contributed to an unhealthy environment, further supporting the Appellant's plea for divorce.

False Allegations: The court held that unfounded accusations by the Respondent, including dowry demands and infidelity, amounted to cruelty, adversely impacting the Appellant's mental well-being and public image.

Financial and Household Responsibilities: The Respondent’s refusal to contribute to household responsibilities, despite not being employed, and her unreasonable demands placed significant strain on the Appellant.

Physical Abuse and Public Humiliation: The Appellant faced physical abuse and public humiliation, including incidents where the Respondent called the police to their home and the Appellant’s workplace, leading to considerable distress.

Decision: The High Court set aside the judgment dated 01.10.2018 of the Family Court and granted divorce to the Appellant under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, due to the Respondent's cruelty.

Date of Decision: April 02, 2024.

xxx vs. xxx

 

Latest Legal News