“Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Successive FIRs Cannot Be Used to Thwart Bail: Supreme Court Invokes Article 32 to Protect Personal Liberty Supreme Court Enforces Contractual Bar Against Interest in Government Contracts Ex Parte Decree Not a Blank Cheque - Merely Because Defendant Absent, Plaintiff’s Case Not Presumed True: Madras High Court Mandatory Injunction Cannot Be Kept in Cold Storage: Supreme Court Enforces Strict Three-Year Limitation for Execution Senior Citizens Act Is for Maintenance, Not a Shortcut to Eviction: Calcutta High Court Restrains Tribunal’s Overreach Statement ‘Counsel Says’ Is Not a Binding Undertaking Without Client’s Specific Authorization: Allahabad High Court Declines to Initiate Contempt Rigours of Section 43-D(5) Melt Down When Liberty Is at Stake: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail in UAPA Case After 2.5 Years’ Custody Vakalatnama Is Not a Mere Form – Attestation Is a Legal Safeguard: Andhra Pradesh High Court Cautions Advocates and Registry on Procedural Sanctity Right to Be Considered for Promotion Is Fundamental – Employer’s Unfairness Cannot Defeat It: : Gujarat High Court Panchayat Statement Implicating Others Is Not a Confession Proper: J&K High Court Rejects Extra-Judicial Confession in Murder Appeal Contempt Lies Only on ‘Wilful and Deliberate Disobedience’ – Fresh KASP Appointments Not Replacement of Daily Wage Workers: Kerala High Court 498A Cannot Become a Dragnet for Entire Family: Orissa High Court Shields Distant In-Laws but Sends Husband to Trial Forgery Of ACR Is No Part Of Official Duty: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against IFS Officer Sole Eye-Witness Not Wholly Reliable, Conviction Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused in Alleged Witchcraft Double Murder Case Functional Disability, Not Mere Physical Percentage, Determines Compensation: Kerala High Court Remands Employees’ Compensation Case for Medical Board Assessment Conviction Cannot Rest On Fictitious Memorandums – When Investigation Is Tainted, Benefit Of Doubt Must Follow: MP High Court Legal Objection Cannot Be Sprung in Second Appeal: P&H High Court Draws Sharp Line Between ‘Legal Plea’ and ‘Legal Objection’ When Foundational Facts Are Seriously Disputed, Writ Court Ought Not To Undertake A Fact-Finding Exercise: Kerala High Court Compliance Affidavits Are Nothing But Admission of Disobedience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Puts Chief Secretaries and DGPs in Dock Over Arnesh Kumar Violations Husband’s Salary Slips Are Personal Information: Rajasthan High Court Refuses Disclosure Under RTI

Marriage Loses Its Sanctity When Conflicts Take the Form of Disrespect: Delhi HC Grants Divorce in Favor of Celebrity Chef Facing Continuous Marital Cruelty

01 August 2025 9:33 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Delhi, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, has granted divorce to xxx, a celebrity chef, observing that "marriage loses its sanctity when conflicts take the form of disrespect and inconsideration towards their spouse."

The judgment revolves around an appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the dismissal of a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Appellant contended that the behavior of his wife amounted to marital cruelty.

The parties, married in 2008, experienced continual discord marked by allegations of cruelty. The Appellant, a renowned chef, accused his wife, xxx, of physical abuse, humiliation, and baseless allegations affecting his career and public image. The issues primarily concerned whether these actions constituted cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Marital Discord and Cruelty: The court observed that continuous conflicts, disrespect, and the Appellant’s humiliation and public embarrassment due to false allegations by the Respondent constituted marital cruelty.

Impact on Child and Family Life: The aggressive behavior and verbal altercations of the Respondent in the presence of their minor child contributed to an unhealthy environment, further supporting the Appellant's plea for divorce.

False Allegations: The court held that unfounded accusations by the Respondent, including dowry demands and infidelity, amounted to cruelty, adversely impacting the Appellant's mental well-being and public image.

Financial and Household Responsibilities: The Respondent’s refusal to contribute to household responsibilities, despite not being employed, and her unreasonable demands placed significant strain on the Appellant.

Physical Abuse and Public Humiliation: The Appellant faced physical abuse and public humiliation, including incidents where the Respondent called the police to their home and the Appellant’s workplace, leading to considerable distress.

Decision: The High Court set aside the judgment dated 01.10.2018 of the Family Court and granted divorce to the Appellant under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, due to the Respondent's cruelty.

Date of Decision: April 02, 2024.

xxx vs. xxx

 

Latest Legal News