Unregistered Gift Deed Cannot Create Title; Injunction Suit Not Maintainable Without Seeking Declaration If Ownership Is Disputed: Delhi High Court PF Default: General Managers Of Co-op Units Not 'Employers' If Ultimate Control Vests With Federation MD, Kerala High Court Quashes Case BCCI Is Not A 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act; Mere Discharge Of Public Functions Not Enough For Inclusion: CIC Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act Is An 'Interlocutory Order', Appeal Under Section 14-A Not Maintainable: Allahabad High Court Electronic Evidence | Nodal Officers Must Be Examined To Prove CDRs; Gait Analysis Inadmissible If Source CCTV Is Corrupted: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Reject Direct Evidence Of Conspiracy On Subjective Notion That It Must Be Hatched In Secrecy: Supreme Court Restores Conviction In Dr. Subbiah Murder Case Waitlisted Candidates Cannot Demand Change Of Posting At Their Whim; Old Select Lists Lapse After Repeal Of Act: Supreme Court NGOs, Individuals Feeding Stray Dogs In Institutional Campuses To Face Tortious Liability For Dog Bites: Supreme Court Stray Dogs Have No Absolute Right To Inhabit Schools, Hospitals Or Restricted Institutional Areas: Supreme Court Bail Jurisdiction Limited To Deciding Release Or Incarceration; High Court Cannot Issue General Directions On Police Accountability: Supreme Court Forest Department Cannot Claim Private Land Without Original Records Or Gazette Notification; Boundaries Prevail Over Area: Sikkim High Court Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators To Vanishing Of Evidence; Trial Court Must Draw Adverse Inference If Crucial Electronic Records Are Not Produced: Rajasthan High Court Land Acquisition: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Compensation Enhancement By Applying Doctrine Of De-Escalation To Government Policy Rates 2-Day Delay In Lodging FIR Immaterial Once Charge Sheet Is Filed In Motor Accident Cases: Orissa High Court Matrimonial Settlement Enforceable Under Contempt Jurisdiction: Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Wife To Abide By Agreement After Receiving ₹1.5 Crore Prosecution Bound By Statements Of Its Own Witnesses; Absence Of Accused’s Signature On Seizure Memo Justifies Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh HC

Marriage Loses Its Sanctity When Conflicts Take the Form of Disrespect: Delhi HC Grants Divorce in Favor of Celebrity Chef Facing Continuous Marital Cruelty

01 August 2025 9:33 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Delhi, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, has granted divorce to xxx, a celebrity chef, observing that "marriage loses its sanctity when conflicts take the form of disrespect and inconsideration towards their spouse."

The judgment revolves around an appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the dismissal of a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Appellant contended that the behavior of his wife amounted to marital cruelty.

The parties, married in 2008, experienced continual discord marked by allegations of cruelty. The Appellant, a renowned chef, accused his wife, xxx, of physical abuse, humiliation, and baseless allegations affecting his career and public image. The issues primarily concerned whether these actions constituted cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

Marital Discord and Cruelty: The court observed that continuous conflicts, disrespect, and the Appellant’s humiliation and public embarrassment due to false allegations by the Respondent constituted marital cruelty.

Impact on Child and Family Life: The aggressive behavior and verbal altercations of the Respondent in the presence of their minor child contributed to an unhealthy environment, further supporting the Appellant's plea for divorce.

False Allegations: The court held that unfounded accusations by the Respondent, including dowry demands and infidelity, amounted to cruelty, adversely impacting the Appellant's mental well-being and public image.

Financial and Household Responsibilities: The Respondent’s refusal to contribute to household responsibilities, despite not being employed, and her unreasonable demands placed significant strain on the Appellant.

Physical Abuse and Public Humiliation: The Appellant faced physical abuse and public humiliation, including incidents where the Respondent called the police to their home and the Appellant’s workplace, leading to considerable distress.

Decision: The High Court set aside the judgment dated 01.10.2018 of the Family Court and granted divorce to the Appellant under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, due to the Respondent's cruelty.

Date of Decision: April 02, 2024.

xxx vs. xxx

 

Latest Legal News