Dismissal Of Suit For Default Doesn't Bar Fresh Partition Suit As Cause Of Action Is Recurring; Second Rejection Of Plaint Application Barred By Res Judicata: Telangana High Court Married Daughter Entitled To Appointment As Fair Price Shop Dealer On Compassionate Grounds; Marital Status No Bar: Allahabad High Court Finding Of Title Cannot Be Recorded In Injunction Simpliciter Suit Absent Specific Pleadings & Issues: Andhra Pradesh High Court Conviction Not A Condition Precedent For Confiscation Of Vehicle Used In Forest Offence: Bombay High Court Advocate’s Professional Call To Client No Proof Of Conspiracy; Sterling Evidence Like CCTV Can Justify Quashing FIR: Gujarat High Court Revenue Entries Changed Without Notifying Affected Parties Are Void; High Court Can Upset Perverse Findings In Second Appeal: Himachal Pradesh HC Mandatory Injunction For Removing Sunshades Or Closing Windows Cannot Be Granted If No Encroachment Is Proved: Karnataka High Court Employer Cannot Resume Work Through Third Parties Until 30-Day Period For Contractor’s Post-Termination Compliance Expires: Madras High Court Circumstantial Chain Fails If Prosecution Doesn't Rule Out Accidental Death: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Wife’s Status As Practicing Lawyer Or Professional Qualification No Absolute Bar To Grant Of Interim Maintenance: Orissa High Court Legally Wedded Wife And Second Wife Entitled To Equal Share In Family Pension If Second Wife Was Nominated & Cared For Deceased: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Suit Filed At The Fag End Of Limitation Reflects Lack Of Readiness And Willingness: Supreme Court Specific Performance Cannot Be Granted If Plaintiff Fails To Prove Financial Readiness At Relevant Time Of Transaction: Supreme Court MACT |Just Compensation For Deceased Professional Students Must Reflect Future Career Trajectory: Supreme Court Stationary Vehicle Parked At Night Without Warning Signs Poses Evident Hazard; SC Refuses To Reduce Compensation For CA Student’s Death Motor Accident Claims: 100% Loss Of Earning Capacity To Be Considered If Amputation Prevents Manual Worker From Pursuing Sole Avocation: Supreme Court Substantive Amendments Rendering Land Transfers 'Void' Are Prospective; Cannot Invalidate Decades-Old Sale Deeds: Supreme Court Registered Sale Deed Carries Formidable Presumption Of Genuineness; Minor Witness Discrepancies Cannot Invalidate Decades-Old Document: Supreme Court

"Marriage Emotionally Dead and Beyond Salvage": Supreme Court Grants Divorce After 15 Years of Separation

06 September 2024 5:37 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 6, 2023: In a trailblazing judgment that has captured the nation's attention, the Supreme Court of India granted a divorce to a couple who had been living separately for over 15 years. The Hon'ble Justices SANJIV KHANNA and M. M. SUNDRESH presided over the case, emphasizing that the marriage was "emotionally dead and beyond salvage."

The case had earlier been through the Trial Court and the High Court of Chhattisgarh, both of which declined to grant the divorce. These courts were criticized by the Supreme Court for their "hyper-technical and pedantic approach."

The apex court's judgment undertook the monumental task of redefining 'cruelty' in the context of divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act. Drawing on prior case laws, the Court said, "Cruelty may be both intentional or unintentional. Matrimonial obligations and responsibilities vary in degrees." The judgment also highlighted that what might be cruel in one context may not be in another, emphasizing the nuance required in such assessments.

The judgment also clarified the discretionary power that the Court holds when it comes to granting divorce. It stated that divorce is "not a matter of right but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution." Factors such as the social and economic status of the parties, the nature of allegations made, the period of time the parties had cohabited after marriage, and any attempts made to settle disputes were outlined as critical for consideration.

The Supreme Court ultimately set aside the judgments of the lower courts, remarking, "It is not as if the respondent Husband is willing to live with the appellant–Wife. Both the parties have moved away and settled in their respective lives. There is no need to continue the agony of a mere status without them living together."

Supreme Court also noted that considerations relating to the welfare of any children, provisions for alimony, and other pending matters are relevant when considering the dissolution of a marriage.

Legal experts believe this judgment will significantly influence how courts handle long-term separations and the complex dynamics involved in marital disputes. The judgment is seen as a major step toward a more pragmatic and compassionate judicial approach to marital discord.

Date of Decision: September 06, 2023

SMT. ROOPA SONI vs KAMALNARAYAN SONI

Latest Legal News