POCSO Presumption Is Not a Dead Letter, But ‘Sterling Witness’ Test Still Governs Conviction: Bombay High Court High Courts Cannot Routinely Entertain Contempt Petitions Beyond One Year: Madras High Court Declines Contempt Plea Filed After Four Years Courts Cannot Reject Suit by Weighing Evidence at Threshold: Delhi High Court Restores Discrimination Suit by Indian Staff Against Italian Embassy Improvised Testimonies and Dubious Recovery Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Allahabad High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Partnership Act | Eviction Suit by Unregistered Firm Maintainable if Based on Statutory Right: Madhya Pradesh High Court Violation of Income Tax Law Doesn’t Void Cheque Bounce Offence: Supreme Court Overrules Kerala HC, Says Section 138 NI Act Stands Independent Overstaying Licensee Cannot Evade Double Damages by Legal Technicalities: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Is Not a Stamp of Truth: Punjab & Haryana High Court Trademark Law Must Protect Reputation, Not Reward Delay Tactics: Bombay High Court Grants Injunction to FedEx Against Dishonest Use of Its Well-Known Mark Commercial Dispute Need Not Wait for a Written Contract: Delhi High Court Upholds Rs.6 Lakh Decree in Rent Recovery Suit Against Storage Defaulter Limitation Begins From Refusal, Not Date of Agreement—Especially When Title Was Under Litigation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sale by Karta of Ancestral Property Without Legal Necessity Is Voidable, Not Void: Madras High Court Dismisses Sons’ Appeal Demand for Gold at 'Chhoochhak' Ceremony Not Dowry – Demand Must Connected With Marriage: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claims Cannot Be Decided on Sympathy – Involvement of Offending Vehicle Must Be Proved: Supreme Court Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Ladder for Career Advancement – It Ends Once Exercised: Supreme Court

"Marriage Emotionally Dead and Beyond Salvage": Supreme Court Grants Divorce After 15 Years of Separation

06 September 2024 5:37 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 6, 2023: In a trailblazing judgment that has captured the nation's attention, the Supreme Court of India granted a divorce to a couple who had been living separately for over 15 years. The Hon'ble Justices SANJIV KHANNA and M. M. SUNDRESH presided over the case, emphasizing that the marriage was "emotionally dead and beyond salvage."

The case had earlier been through the Trial Court and the High Court of Chhattisgarh, both of which declined to grant the divorce. These courts were criticized by the Supreme Court for their "hyper-technical and pedantic approach."

The apex court's judgment undertook the monumental task of redefining 'cruelty' in the context of divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act. Drawing on prior case laws, the Court said, "Cruelty may be both intentional or unintentional. Matrimonial obligations and responsibilities vary in degrees." The judgment also highlighted that what might be cruel in one context may not be in another, emphasizing the nuance required in such assessments.

The judgment also clarified the discretionary power that the Court holds when it comes to granting divorce. It stated that divorce is "not a matter of right but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution." Factors such as the social and economic status of the parties, the nature of allegations made, the period of time the parties had cohabited after marriage, and any attempts made to settle disputes were outlined as critical for consideration.

The Supreme Court ultimately set aside the judgments of the lower courts, remarking, "It is not as if the respondent Husband is willing to live with the appellant–Wife. Both the parties have moved away and settled in their respective lives. There is no need to continue the agony of a mere status without them living together."

Supreme Court also noted that considerations relating to the welfare of any children, provisions for alimony, and other pending matters are relevant when considering the dissolution of a marriage.

Legal experts believe this judgment will significantly influence how courts handle long-term separations and the complex dynamics involved in marital disputes. The judgment is seen as a major step toward a more pragmatic and compassionate judicial approach to marital discord.

Date of Decision: September 06, 2023

SMT. ROOPA SONI vs KAMALNARAYAN SONI

Latest Legal News