Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

"Marriage Emotionally Dead and Beyond Salvage": Supreme Court Grants Divorce After 15 Years of Separation

06 September 2024 5:37 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 6, 2023: In a trailblazing judgment that has captured the nation's attention, the Supreme Court of India granted a divorce to a couple who had been living separately for over 15 years. The Hon'ble Justices SANJIV KHANNA and M. M. SUNDRESH presided over the case, emphasizing that the marriage was "emotionally dead and beyond salvage."

The case had earlier been through the Trial Court and the High Court of Chhattisgarh, both of which declined to grant the divorce. These courts were criticized by the Supreme Court for their "hyper-technical and pedantic approach."

The apex court's judgment undertook the monumental task of redefining 'cruelty' in the context of divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act. Drawing on prior case laws, the Court said, "Cruelty may be both intentional or unintentional. Matrimonial obligations and responsibilities vary in degrees." The judgment also highlighted that what might be cruel in one context may not be in another, emphasizing the nuance required in such assessments.

The judgment also clarified the discretionary power that the Court holds when it comes to granting divorce. It stated that divorce is "not a matter of right but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution." Factors such as the social and economic status of the parties, the nature of allegations made, the period of time the parties had cohabited after marriage, and any attempts made to settle disputes were outlined as critical for consideration.

The Supreme Court ultimately set aside the judgments of the lower courts, remarking, "It is not as if the respondent Husband is willing to live with the appellant–Wife. Both the parties have moved away and settled in their respective lives. There is no need to continue the agony of a mere status without them living together."

Supreme Court also noted that considerations relating to the welfare of any children, provisions for alimony, and other pending matters are relevant when considering the dissolution of a marriage.

Legal experts believe this judgment will significantly influence how courts handle long-term separations and the complex dynamics involved in marital disputes. The judgment is seen as a major step toward a more pragmatic and compassionate judicial approach to marital discord.

Date of Decision: September 06, 2023

SMT. ROOPA SONI vs KAMALNARAYAN SONI

Latest Legal News