Seniority Must Be Calculated From the Date of Initial Appointment, Not Regularization: Madras High Court Rules Section 319 Cr.P.C. | Mere Association Not Enough for Criminal Liability: Karnataka HC Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds ₹25,000 Per Kanal Compensation for Land Acquired for Nangal-Talwara Railway Line, Dismisses Railway’s Appeal No Work No Pay Principle Not Applicable: Orissa High Court Orders Reinstatement and Full Back Wages for Wrongfully Terminated Lecturer No Assault, No Obstruction, Only Words Exchanged: Bombay High Court Quashes Charges of Obstruction Against Advocates Under Section 353 IPC Matrimonial Offences Can Be Quashed Even if Non-Compoundable, When Genuine Compromise Is Reached: J&K HC Plaintiff Entitled to Partition, But Must Contribute Redemption Share to Defendant: Delhi High Court Clarifies Subrogation Rights in Mortgage Redemption Labeling Someone A 'Rowdy' Without Convictions Infringes Personal Liberty And Reputation: Kerala High Court P&H High Court Denies Pensionary Benefits for Work-Charged Employee's Widow; Declares Work-Charged Service Not Eligible for ACP or Pension Benefits Acquittal is Acquittal: Rajasthan High Court Orders Appointment of Candidate Denied Job Over Past FIR At The Bail Stage, Culpability Is Not To Be Decided; Allegations Must Be Tested During Trial: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in SCST Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to "Secular" and "Socialist" Additions in Constitution Preamble Supreme Court Rejects Res Judicata in Land Allotment Case: Fresh Cause of Action Validates Public Interest Litigation Public Resources Are Not Privileges for the Few: Supreme Court Declares Preferential Land Allotments to Elites Unconstitutional Past antecedents alone cannot justify denial of bail: Kerala High Court Grants Bail Revenue Records Alone Cannot Prove Ownership: Madras High Court Dismisses Temple's Appeal for Injunction Humanitarian Grounds Cannot Undermine Investigation: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Interim Bail in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam The Power Under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 CPC is Drastic and Extraordinary; Should Not Be Exercised Mechanically or Merely for the Asking: Calcutta High Court Telangana High Court Strikes Down Section 10-A: Upholds Transparency in Public Employment Absence of Homogeneous Mixing and Procedural Deficiencies Vitiate NDPS Conviction: Punjab and Haryana High Court Business Disputes Cannot Be Given Criminal Color: Patna High Court Quashes Complaint in Trademark Agreement Case Gujarat High Court Appoints Wife as Guardian of Comatose Husband, Calls for Legislative Framework Standard of Proof in Professional Misconduct Requires 'Higher Threshold' but Below 'Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Delhi High Court Imprisonment Cannot Bar Education: Bombay HC Allows UAPA Accused to Pursue LL.B. High Court Acquits Accused in Double Murder Case, Asserts ‘Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof’ Long separation and irreparable breakdown of marriage must be read as cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Regulation 101 Applies to All Aided Institutions, Including Minority Ones, Says Allahabad High Court Fraud Unravels All Judicial Acts : Jharkhand High Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Ratan Heights Case Suspicious Circumstances Cannot Validate a Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds 1997 Will Over 2000 Will

"Marriage Emotionally Dead and Beyond Salvage": Supreme Court Grants Divorce After 15 Years of Separation

06 September 2024 5:37 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 6, 2023: In a trailblazing judgment that has captured the nation's attention, the Supreme Court of India granted a divorce to a couple who had been living separately for over 15 years. The Hon'ble Justices SANJIV KHANNA and M. M. SUNDRESH presided over the case, emphasizing that the marriage was "emotionally dead and beyond salvage."

The case had earlier been through the Trial Court and the High Court of Chhattisgarh, both of which declined to grant the divorce. These courts were criticized by the Supreme Court for their "hyper-technical and pedantic approach."

The apex court's judgment undertook the monumental task of redefining 'cruelty' in the context of divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act. Drawing on prior case laws, the Court said, "Cruelty may be both intentional or unintentional. Matrimonial obligations and responsibilities vary in degrees." The judgment also highlighted that what might be cruel in one context may not be in another, emphasizing the nuance required in such assessments.

The judgment also clarified the discretionary power that the Court holds when it comes to granting divorce. It stated that divorce is "not a matter of right but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution." Factors such as the social and economic status of the parties, the nature of allegations made, the period of time the parties had cohabited after marriage, and any attempts made to settle disputes were outlined as critical for consideration.

The Supreme Court ultimately set aside the judgments of the lower courts, remarking, "It is not as if the respondent Husband is willing to live with the appellant–Wife. Both the parties have moved away and settled in their respective lives. There is no need to continue the agony of a mere status without them living together."

Supreme Court also noted that considerations relating to the welfare of any children, provisions for alimony, and other pending matters are relevant when considering the dissolution of a marriage.

Legal experts believe this judgment will significantly influence how courts handle long-term separations and the complex dynamics involved in marital disputes. The judgment is seen as a major step toward a more pragmatic and compassionate judicial approach to marital discord.

Date of Decision: September 06, 2023

SMT. ROOPA SONI vs KAMALNARAYAN SONI

Similar News