Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

"Marriage Emotionally Dead and Beyond Salvage": Supreme Court Grants Divorce After 15 Years of Separation

06 September 2024 5:37 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 6, 2023: In a trailblazing judgment that has captured the nation's attention, the Supreme Court of India granted a divorce to a couple who had been living separately for over 15 years. The Hon'ble Justices SANJIV KHANNA and M. M. SUNDRESH presided over the case, emphasizing that the marriage was "emotionally dead and beyond salvage."

The case had earlier been through the Trial Court and the High Court of Chhattisgarh, both of which declined to grant the divorce. These courts were criticized by the Supreme Court for their "hyper-technical and pedantic approach."

The apex court's judgment undertook the monumental task of redefining 'cruelty' in the context of divorce under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act. Drawing on prior case laws, the Court said, "Cruelty may be both intentional or unintentional. Matrimonial obligations and responsibilities vary in degrees." The judgment also highlighted that what might be cruel in one context may not be in another, emphasizing the nuance required in such assessments.

The judgment also clarified the discretionary power that the Court holds when it comes to granting divorce. It stated that divorce is "not a matter of right but a discretion which is to be exercised with great care and caution." Factors such as the social and economic status of the parties, the nature of allegations made, the period of time the parties had cohabited after marriage, and any attempts made to settle disputes were outlined as critical for consideration.

The Supreme Court ultimately set aside the judgments of the lower courts, remarking, "It is not as if the respondent Husband is willing to live with the appellant–Wife. Both the parties have moved away and settled in their respective lives. There is no need to continue the agony of a mere status without them living together."

Supreme Court also noted that considerations relating to the welfare of any children, provisions for alimony, and other pending matters are relevant when considering the dissolution of a marriage.

Legal experts believe this judgment will significantly influence how courts handle long-term separations and the complex dynamics involved in marital disputes. The judgment is seen as a major step toward a more pragmatic and compassionate judicial approach to marital discord.

Date of Decision: September 06, 2023

SMT. ROOPA SONI vs KAMALNARAYAN SONI

Latest Legal News