Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

Manufacturing and Selling of Olaparib by Natco Constitutes Infringement: Delhi HC Grants Injunction Upholding Kudos Pharmaceuticals’ Patent Rights

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a landmark judgment, has upheld the patent rights of Kudos Pharmaceuticals Limited, restraining Natco Pharma Limited from the manufacture and sale of the cancer drug Olaparib. The court’s decision addresses vital aspects of patent law, reinforcing the protection granted to patented innovations in the pharmaceutical sector.

  1. Patent Infringement Established: The judgment pronounced that Natco’s activities related to Olaparib constituted a clear infringement of Kudos’ suit patent IN’720, emphasizing the patent’s long-standing validity without opposition for 19 years.
  2. Examination of Validity Challenge: The court meticulously examined Natco’s arguments against the patent’s validity, focusing on inventive step and anticipation arguments. The ruling articulated that these challenges lacked the necessary credibility.
  3. Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court awarded an interlocutory injunction favoring Kudos, thereby preventing Natco from engaging in activities involving Olaparib. Concurrently, Natco’s counterclaim seeking an injunction against Kudos was dismissed.
  4. Legal Precedents and Principles: The decision elaborated on critical principles under Sections 64, 3(d), and 8 of the Patents Act. It highlighted the stringent criteria for mounting a credible challenge to the validity of a patent, distinguishing between patent coverage and actual disclosure.

Observations from the Court: Justice C. Hari Shankar noted, “The lack of opposition through the patent’s life span and the failure of the defendant to initiate any proceedings challenging the patent illustrate the strength and legitimacy of the patent holder’s rights.”

This ruling is a significant triumph for Kudos Pharmaceuticals, reinforcing the company’s patent on Olaparib. It sets a crucial precedent regarding the requirements for successfully challenging the validity of a patent.

Date of Decision: March 1, 2024

Kudos Pharmaceuticals Limited & Ors. Vs. Natco Pharma Limited

Latest Legal News