MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Manufacturing and Selling of Olaparib by Natco Constitutes Infringement: Delhi HC Grants Injunction Upholding Kudos Pharmaceuticals’ Patent Rights

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court, in a landmark judgment, has upheld the patent rights of Kudos Pharmaceuticals Limited, restraining Natco Pharma Limited from the manufacture and sale of the cancer drug Olaparib. The court’s decision addresses vital aspects of patent law, reinforcing the protection granted to patented innovations in the pharmaceutical sector.

  1. Patent Infringement Established: The judgment pronounced that Natco’s activities related to Olaparib constituted a clear infringement of Kudos’ suit patent IN’720, emphasizing the patent’s long-standing validity without opposition for 19 years.
  2. Examination of Validity Challenge: The court meticulously examined Natco’s arguments against the patent’s validity, focusing on inventive step and anticipation arguments. The ruling articulated that these challenges lacked the necessary credibility.
  3. Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court awarded an interlocutory injunction favoring Kudos, thereby preventing Natco from engaging in activities involving Olaparib. Concurrently, Natco’s counterclaim seeking an injunction against Kudos was dismissed.
  4. Legal Precedents and Principles: The decision elaborated on critical principles under Sections 64, 3(d), and 8 of the Patents Act. It highlighted the stringent criteria for mounting a credible challenge to the validity of a patent, distinguishing between patent coverage and actual disclosure.

Observations from the Court: Justice C. Hari Shankar noted, “The lack of opposition through the patent’s life span and the failure of the defendant to initiate any proceedings challenging the patent illustrate the strength and legitimacy of the patent holder’s rights.”

This ruling is a significant triumph for Kudos Pharmaceuticals, reinforcing the company’s patent on Olaparib. It sets a crucial precedent regarding the requirements for successfully challenging the validity of a patent.

Date of Decision: March 1, 2024

Kudos Pharmaceuticals Limited & Ors. Vs. Natco Pharma Limited

Latest Legal News