Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case

Mandatory Victim Notice for Bail in SC & ST Act Cases Non-Negotiable: Delhi HC Sets Aside Bail for Non-Compliance

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court set aside a bail order for non-compliance with the mandatory notice requirements under the Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The court, led by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla, emphasized the critical need to adhere to the procedural norms laid down in the Act, particularly regarding the victim’s right to be heard in bail proceedings.

The judgment centered around the procedural imperatives under Sections 15A(3) and 15A(5) of the SC & ST Act. These sections mandate providing reasonable notice of bail proceedings to the victim and ensuring their right to be heard. The crux of the legal issue was whether the bail granted to the respondent without adhering to these provisions could stand judicial scrutiny.

The appeal, filed under Section 14A(2) of the SC & ST Act by the alleged victim, challenged an order granting bail to the respondent in a case involving offences under the IPC and SC & ST Act. The appellant contended that the order was passed without serving notice of the bail application, thus violating Sections 15A(3) and 15A(5) of the SC & ST Act.

The court, referring to the Supreme Court judgment in Hariram Bhambhi v. Satyanarayan & Anr., noted that the absence of notice to the appellant and the opportunity to be heard rendered the bail order liable to be set aside. Justice Navin Chawla observed, “Compliance with sub-section (3) and (5) of Section 15A of the SC & ST Act is mandatory in nature, and the bail granted in contravention thereof is liable to be set aside only on that ground.” The court further remarked on the continued reality of atrocities against SC and ST communities, underscoring the importance of strict adherence to the statutory protections afforded to them.

The High Court set aside the impugned bail order due to the procedural lapses identified. The bail application was remanded back for reconsideration by the Special Judge, with explicit directions to comply with the procedural requirements and provide an opportunity for the appellant to be heard. However, the respondent was granted temporary relief, not to be taken into custody for 15 days, subject to the Special Judge’s orders on the renewed bail application.

Date of Decision: 14th February 2024

 X vs. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

 

Latest Legal News