Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Making False Allegations of Dowry demands and Domestic Violence is Mental cruelty: High Court of Delhi Grants Divorce

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Delhi has granted a decree of divorce to Sandeep Singh, the appellant, under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Court found that the respondent, Jagwanti @ Nidhi, had subjected the appellant to cruelty by making false allegations of dowry demand and domestic violence.

The pivotal legal point addressed in this judgment was the interpretation of ‘cruelty’ under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Court observed that cruelty in a matrimonial relationship could be mental or physical, and false allegations causing mental agony can constitute mental cruelty.

The marriage between Sandeep Singh and Jagwanti was solemnized in January 2004. Following the marriage, a series of incidents involving allegations of dowry demand, desertion, and domestic violence emerged, leading to criminal trials. The appellant, aggrieved by these circumstances, sought divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

The Court, referring to various Supreme Court judgments, highlighted that mental cruelty is established when the conduct of one spouse inflicts such mental pain on the other, making it impossible for them to live together. The Court found the respondent’s conduct, including her false allegations leading to criminal trials, constituted such mental cruelty.

The Court also addressed the issue of desertion. It noted that the respondent’s prolonged and frequent absences from the matrimonial home, without efforts to return, constituted desertion.

In distinguishing between criminal and civil standards of proof, the Court clarified that acquittal in criminal proceedings does not automatically negate cruelty in matrimonial disputes, as the standards of proof differ.

The High Court set aside the judgment of the Family Court and granted a decree of divorce to the appellant, acknowledging the mental cruelty inflicted upon him through false allegations and subsequent criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision: February 28, 2024

“SANDEEP SINGH vs. JAGWANTI @ NIDHI”

Latest Legal News