Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

Making False Allegations of Dowry demands and Domestic Violence is Mental cruelty: High Court of Delhi Grants Divorce

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Delhi has granted a decree of divorce to Sandeep Singh, the appellant, under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Court found that the respondent, Jagwanti @ Nidhi, had subjected the appellant to cruelty by making false allegations of dowry demand and domestic violence.

The pivotal legal point addressed in this judgment was the interpretation of ‘cruelty’ under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The Court observed that cruelty in a matrimonial relationship could be mental or physical, and false allegations causing mental agony can constitute mental cruelty.

The marriage between Sandeep Singh and Jagwanti was solemnized in January 2004. Following the marriage, a series of incidents involving allegations of dowry demand, desertion, and domestic violence emerged, leading to criminal trials. The appellant, aggrieved by these circumstances, sought divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion.

The Court, referring to various Supreme Court judgments, highlighted that mental cruelty is established when the conduct of one spouse inflicts such mental pain on the other, making it impossible for them to live together. The Court found the respondent’s conduct, including her false allegations leading to criminal trials, constituted such mental cruelty.

The Court also addressed the issue of desertion. It noted that the respondent’s prolonged and frequent absences from the matrimonial home, without efforts to return, constituted desertion.

In distinguishing between criminal and civil standards of proof, the Court clarified that acquittal in criminal proceedings does not automatically negate cruelty in matrimonial disputes, as the standards of proof differ.

The High Court set aside the judgment of the Family Court and granted a decree of divorce to the appellant, acknowledging the mental cruelty inflicted upon him through false allegations and subsequent criminal proceedings.

Date of Decision: February 28, 2024

“SANDEEP SINGH vs. JAGWANTI @ NIDHI”

Latest Legal News