Procedural Lapses and Prolonged Incarceration Justify Bail Under NDPS Act: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Deposit of Sale Balance Is Not Fatal to Specific Performance Claims: Andhra High Court Justice Requires Insurance Company to Pay and Recover: Calcutta High Court on Fatal Accident Case IBC Moratorium Nullifies Vicarious Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act: Delhi High Court Fraud Unravels All: Partition Decree Set Aside for Suppressing Rights of Co-Owners: Madras High Court Matters of Evidence Must Be Examined at Trial, Not Preemptively Quashed: Kerala High Court Declines Quashment Leave Encashment Is a Property Right and Cannot Be Denied Without Statutory Authority: Gujarat High Court Widow's Right to Deceased Husband’s Property Ceases Upon Remarriage Before 1956: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Reassessment of Departmental Inquiries by Courts, Orders Interest on Delayed GPF Payments: P&H High Court Investigations Initiated Before BNSS, 2023, Must Proceed Under Cr.P.C., 1973: Rajasthan High Court Third-Party Objector’s Locus Standi in Criminal Cases Must Have a Bona Fide Connection: Madhya Pradesh High Court Amendments After Trial Commences Barred Without Demonstration of Due Diligence - Contradictory Claims Cannot Be Permitted: Punjab & Haryana High Court Double Presumption of Innocence in Appeals Against Acquittals Must Be Respected: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape and Carnal Intercourse Case Provisional Release Not Prejudice Revenue Interests: Kerala High Court Permits Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under GST Act GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without Objective Criteria:  Delhi High Court Neither the Statutory Framework nor Lease Terms Compel Conveyance of Property: Supreme Court Owner Can Avoid Confiscation Under NDPS by Proving Lack of Knowledge or Connivance in Illicit Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court Court is Expert of Experts: High Court Upholds Right to Rebuttal Evidence in Will Dispute Exceptional Circumstances Warrant Use of Inherent Powers to Reduce Sentences in Non-Compoundable Offenses: Supreme Court

Maintenance Cannot Be Reclaimed Retroactively in Domestic Violence Cases: Supreme Court

01 October 2024 6:48 PM

By: sayum


An order for revocation can only apply prospectively, not to periods before the order. Supreme Court of India in S Vijikumari v. Mouneshwarachari C, ruled that maintenance already paid under a domestic violence order cannot be reclaimed retrospectively. The Court, presided by Justices B.V. Nagarathna and N.K. Singh, set aside the Karnataka High Court's decision to remand the matter to the Magistrate, holding that any modification under Section 25 of the Domestic Violence Act can only apply prospectively, following a change in circumstances after the original order.

The appellant, S Vijikumari, was awarded maintenance of ₹12,000 per month in 2015 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The respondent, her husband Mouneshwarachari, filed an application under Section 25 of the Act, claiming that the maintenance should be revoked due to the wife's alleged employment and misrepresentation. He sought a refund of the entire amount paid since the original order.

The central issue was whether the respondent could seek a refund of maintenance already paid by claiming a change in circumstances. The Supreme Court examined whether Section 25(2) of the Domestic Violence Act allows for such retroactive modifications.

Justice Nagarathna clarified that any alteration, modification, or revocation under Section 25(2) of the Act can only apply from the date the application is made, not retrospectively. The Court emphasized that the respondent's request for a refund of the entire amount paid since 2015 was not maintainable, as the original order had attained finality and could not be undone.

"Revocation or modification of maintenance can only apply prospectively; it cannot relate to periods before the application."

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's remand order and dismissed the respondent’s application for a refund of maintenance. However, it allowed the respondent to file a fresh application for revocation or modification of the maintenance order, but only prospectively.

Date of Decision: September 10, 2024

S Vijikumari v. Mouneshwarachari C​.

Similar News