Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Magistrate Not Bound to Direct Police Investigation in Every Case: Delhi High Court Upholds Discretion in FIR Registration

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has reiterated the discretionary power of magistrates in directing police to register FIRs. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar on November 29, 2023, emphasized that “the Magistrate is not bound to direct police investigation in every case disclosing a cognizable offence.”

The case, titled W.P.(CRL) 1210/2023 and CRL.M.A. 11298/2023, Involved a petitioner seeking directions for FIR registration and protection, which was ultimately denied by the court. The court’s ruling highlighted the critical aspects of judicial discretion and the proper application of Sections 156(3) and 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C).

Justice Bhatnagar’s decision stressed the importance of a judicial approach in considering applications for police investigation. He remarked that “the Magistrate ought to direct investigation by the police if the evidence is required to be collected with the assistance of the police.” This statement underscores the necessity for magistrates to evaluate the need for police intervention on a case-by-case basis, rather than issuing directions mechanically.

The judgment also addressed the limitations of the High Court's Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C, specifically in cases where a revision petition has already been adjudicated upon by lower courts. The court firmly stated that such powers “should not be used as a substitute for second revision petitions,” thus upholding the sanctity of the judicial process and discouraging frivolous litigation.

Furthermore, the ruling acknowledged the importance of preventing the misuse of judicial mechanisms and procedures. It reinforced the principle that High Court intervention is warranted only in cases of “miscarriage of justice or abuse of process.”

Date of Decision: 29 November  2023

ANJURI KUMARI VS  THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

 

Latest Legal News